Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 71, Issue 1–2, pp 109–133 | Cite as

Observations of mesoscale cellular convection from the marine stratocumulus phase of “fire”

  • Kerry A. Moyer
  • George S. Young
Article

Abstract

A common mode of convection within the atmospheric boundary layer, mesoscale cellular convection (MCC), assumes the form of an organized array of three-dimensional polygonal cells. This study employs aircraft data, collected off the coast of California during the marine stratocumulus phase of the First ISCCP (International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project) Regional Experiment (FIRE), to investigate the closed cell variety of MCC. Forty-five transects of closed marine mesoscale convective cells are utilized in this study. Data from these transects are used to calculate first-order and scale-dependent second-order kinematic, thermodynamic, and radiation statistics. From these statistics, a conceptual model of closed MCC is constructed detailing the horizontal and vertical structure of the cells in coupled as well as decoupled boundary-layer environments.

Mesoscale convective cells not only have a profound influence on the radiation budget of their environment, but also play a key role in governing the exchange of heat, moisture, and momentum between the atmosphere and the surface. During FIRE, the MCC-scale structures were found to be buoyantly-driven above cloud base and driven by perturbation pressure forces below. Microscale eddies generally worked in tandem with these MCC-scale structures to transport heat and moisture vertically throughout the cells. Microscale eddies were responsible for most of this transport within the surface layer, while MCC-scale structures performed most of the transport at mid-levels within the cells.

Keywords

Boundary Layer Conceptual Model Atmospheric Boundary Layer Radiation Statistic Vertical Structure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agee, E. M.: 1987. ‘Mesoscale Cellular Convection over the Oceans’,Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 10, 317–341.Google Scholar
  2. Agee, E. M. and Lomax, F. E.: 1978, ‘Structure of the Mixed Layer and Inversion Layer Associated with Patterns of Mesoscale Cellular Convection during AMTEX 75’,J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 2281–2301.Google Scholar
  3. Albrecht, B. A., Randall, D. A., and Nicholls, S.: 1988: ‘Observations of Marine Stratocumulus Clouds during FIRE’,Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 69, 618–626.Google Scholar
  4. Arnason, G., Greenfield, R. S., and Newburg, E. A.: 1968: ‘A Numerical Experiment in Dry and Moist Convection Including the Rain Stage’,J. Atmos. Sci. 25, 404–415.Google Scholar
  5. Baumgardner, D.: 1986, ‘Airborne Measurements for Cloud Microphysics’, Bulletin No. 24, National Center for Atmospheric Research — Research Aviation Facility, Boulder, CO 80307, 23 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Betts, A. K., and Boers, R.: 1990, ‘A Cloudiness Transition in a Marine Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 1480–1497.Google Scholar
  7. Brost, R. A., Wyngaard, J. C., and Lenschow, D. H.: 1982, ‘Marine Stratocumulus Layers. Part II: Turbulence Budgets’,J. Atmos. Sci. 39, 818–836.Google Scholar
  8. Brümmer, B., and Busack, B.: 1990, ‘Convective Patterns within a Field of Stratocumulus’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 118, 801–817.Google Scholar
  9. Buck, A. L.: 1976, ‘The Variable Path Lyman-alpha Hygrometer and its Operating Characteristics’,Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 57, 1113–1118.Google Scholar
  10. Burt, W. V., and Agee, E. M.: 1977, ‘Buoy and Satellite Observations of Mesoscale Cellular Convection during AMTEX 75’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol-Layer 12, 3–24.Google Scholar
  11. Devore, J. L.: 1991,Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. 716 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Khalsa, S. J. S.: 1993, ‘Direct Sampling of Entrainment Events in a Marine Stratocumulus Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 1734–1750.Google Scholar
  13. Kloesel, K. A., Albrecht, B. A., and Wylie, D. P.: 1988, FIRE Marine Stratocumulus Observations — Summary of Operations and Synoptic Conditions. FIRE Technical Report No. 1, The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Meteorology, University Park, PA 16802, 171 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Laufersweiler, M. J., and Kloesel, K. A.: 1991, FIRE Marine Stratocumulus Observations — Vertical Structure of the Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer. FIRE Technical Report No. 3, The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Meteorology, University Park, PA 16802, 153 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Lenschow, D. H., Paluch, I. R., Bandy, A. R., Pearson, Jr., R., Kawa, S. R., Weaver, C. J., Huebert, B. J., Kay, J. G., Thornton, D. C., and Driedger III, A. R.: 1988, ‘Dynamics and Chemistry of Marine Stratocumulus (DYCOMS) Experiment’,Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 69, 1058–1066.Google Scholar
  16. Matthews, R. D., Sawyer, R. F., and Schefer, R. W.: 1977, ‘Interferences in Chemiluminescent Measurements of NO and NO2 Emissions from Combustion Systems’,Environ. Sci. Technol. 11, 1092–1096.Google Scholar
  17. Moyer, K. A., and Young, G. S.: 1990, ‘Observations of Vertical Velocity Skewness within the Marine Stratocumulus-Topped Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 48, 403–410.Google Scholar
  18. Moyer, K. A., and Young, G. S.: 1993, ‘Buoyant Forcing within the Marine Stratocumulus-Topped Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 2759–2771.Google Scholar
  19. National Center for Atmospheric Research — Research Aviation Facility, 1984: The NCAR Electra: Overview and Summary of Capabilities. Bulletin No. 4, National Center for Atmospheric Research — Research Aviation Facility, Boulder, CO 80307, 10 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Nicholls, S.: 1984, ‘The Dynamics of Stratocumulus: Aircraft Observations and Comparisons with a Mixed Layer Model’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol Soc. 110, 783–820.Google Scholar
  21. Nicholls, S., and Leighton, J.: 1986, ‘An Observational Study of the Structure of Stratiform cloud sheets: Part I, Structure’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 112, 431–460.Google Scholar
  22. Ogura, Y., and Phillips, N. A.: 1972, ‘Scale Analysis of Deep and Shallow Convection in the Atmosphere’,J. Atmos. Sci. 19, 173–179.Google Scholar
  23. Paluch, I. R., and Lenschow, D. H.: 1991: ‘Stratiform Cloud Formation in the Marine Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 48, 2141–2158.Google Scholar
  24. Pearson, R., Jr., and Stedman, D. H.: 1980, ‘Instrumentation for Fast-Response Ozone Measurement from Aircraft’,Atmos. Technol. 12, 51–55.Google Scholar
  25. Rothermel, J. and Agee, E. M.: 1980, ‘Aircraft Investigation of Mesoscale Cellular Convection during AMTEX 75’,J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 1027–1040.Google Scholar
  26. Schubert, W. H., Wakefield, J. S., Steiner, E. J., and Cox, S. K.: 1979, ‘Marine Stratocumulus Convection. Part I: Governing Equations and Horizontally Homogeneous Solutions’,J. Atmos. Sci. 36, 1286–1307.Google Scholar
  27. Siems, S. T., Bretherton, C. S., Baker, M. B., Shy, S., and Breidenthal, R. E.: 1990: Buoyancy Reversal and Cloud-Top Entrainment Instability’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 116, 705–739.Google Scholar
  28. Slingo, A., Nicholls, S., and Schmetz, J.: 1982, ‘Aircraft Observations of Marine Stratocumulus during JASIN’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 108, 833–856.Google Scholar
  29. Stull, R. B.: 1988,An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 666 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Wang, S. and Albrecht, B. A.: 1986, ‘A Stratocumulus Model with an Internal Circulation’,J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 2374–2391.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerry A. Moyer
    • 1
  • George S. Young
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MeteorologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations