Skip to main content
Log in

The well-posed problem

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many statistical problems, including some of the most important for physical applications, have long been regarded as underdetermined from the standpoint of a strict frequency definition of probability; yet they may appear wellposed or even overdetermined by the principles of maximum entropy and transformation groups. Furthermore, the distributions found by these methods turn out to have a definite frequency correspondence; the distribution obtained by invariance under a transformation group is by far the most likely to be observed experimentally, in the sense that it requires by far the least “skill.” These properties are illustrated by analyzing the famous Bertrand paradox. On the viewpoint advocated here, Bertrand's problem turns out to be well posed after all, and the unique solution has been verified experimentally. We conclude that probability theory has a wider range of useful applications than would be supposed from the standpoint of the usual frequency definitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. T. Jaynes, Prior probabilities,IEEE Trans. Systems Sci. Cybernetics SSC-4 (3), 227–241 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Bertrand,Calcul des probabilités (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1889), pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Borel,Éléments de la théorie des probabilités (Hermann et Fils, Paris, 1909), pp. 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Poincaré,Calcul des probabilités (Paris, 1912), pp. 118–130.

  5. J. V. Uspensky,Introduction to Mathematical Probability (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1937), p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. P. Northrup,Riddles in Mathematics (van Nostrand, New York, 1944), pp. 181–183.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. V. Gnedenko,The Theory of Probability (Chelsea Publ. Co., New York, 1962), pp. 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. G. Kendall and P. A. P. Moran,Geometrical Probability (Hafner Publ. Co., New York, 1963), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Weaver,Lady Luck: the Theory of Probability (Doubleday-Anchor, Garden City, New York, 1963), pp. 356–357.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. von Mises, inMathematical Theory of Probability and Statistics, H. Geiringer, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1964), pp. 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. von Mises,Probability, Statistics and Truth (Macmillan, New York, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Mosteller,Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1965), p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. P. Wigner,Gruppentheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Quantenmechanik der Atomspektren (Fr. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1931).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Weyl,The Classical Groups (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaynes, E.T. The well-posed problem. Found Phys 3, 477–492 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709116

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709116

Keywords

Navigation