Abstract
In this paper, possible objections to the propensity microrealistic version of quantum mechanics proposed in Part I are answered. This version of quantum mechanics is compared with the statistical, particle, microrealistic viewpoint, and a crucial experiment is proposed designed to distinguish between these two microrealistic versions of quantum mechanics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. C. Kemble,The Fundamental Principles of Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York (1937), pp. 58–71.
H. Margenau,Phil. Sci. 25, 25 (1968).
A. Landé,New Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1965).
R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs,Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, McGraw-Hill, New York (1965), p. 96.
J. L. Park,Am. J. Phys. 36, 211 (1968).
L. E. Ballentine,Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 358 (1970).
K. Popper, inQuantum Mechanics and Reality, M. Bunge, ed., Springer, Berlin (1967).
P. Ehrenfest and P. Epstein,Proc. Nat. Acad. 13, 407 (1927).
M. Gardner,Br. J. Phil. Sci. 23, 13 (1972).
A. Fine,Br. J. Phil. Sci. 24, 1 (1973).
N. Maxwell,Phys. Lett. 43A, 29 (1973).
L. A. Khalfin,Sov. Phys. J. 6, 1054 (1953);Sov. Phys.—Doklady 5, 515 (1960).
R. G. Winter,Phys. Rev. 123, 1503 (1961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Part I of this paper appeared inFound. Phys. 6, 275 (1976).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maxwell, N. Toward a microrealistic version of quantum mechanics. Part II. Found Phys 6, 661–676 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708945
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708945