Skip to main content
Log in

The inexactness of time

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The differential aging effect is shown to be valid in any physically reasonable extension of the special theory of relativity which includes a description of accelerating observers. Einstein's controversial assumption—the clock hypothesis—is avoided. Instead, it is sufficient to assume accessibility—that it is possible to travel from one inertial observer to another and then return to the first in a reasonable manner. Since Minkowski space-time displays this accessibility property, there must be an error in Sachs's quaternion development of general relativity. No assumptions concerning measurements—proper time—of accelerating observers are necessary, nor are assumptions concerning special features of their motion—uniform acceleration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Sachs, A resolution of the clock paradox,Physics Today 24 (9), 23–28 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Marder,Time and the Space-Traveler (George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Bondi, Some special solutions of the Einstein equations, in Brandeis Summer Institute in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, G. The inexactness of time. Found Phys 3, 389–398 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708680

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708680

Keywords

Navigation