Foundations of Physics

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 47–56 | Cite as

Two studies concerning the Michelson-Morley experiment

  • Håkan Törnebohm
Article

Abstract

In the first of these two studies it is argued that the discrepancy between the predicted and actual outcome of the Michelson-Morley experiment is due to the use of Newton's velocity addition theorem in conjunction with an electromagnetic theory of light. The ether hypothesis is not directly affected at all. The second study is a case study of the removal of a clash in physics generated from the outcome of an experiment. The clash due to the Michelson-Morley experiment gave rise to a program of revision. In the process of implementation of this program Newtonian mechanics was remolded. It is argued that the Riemannian space-time in Einstein's general theory of relativity may be regarded as a successor of the classical ether.

Keywords

Ether General Theory Actual Outcome Newtonian Mechanic Electromagnetic Theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Aharoni,The Special Theory of Relativity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1959).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Bohm,The Special Theory of Relativity (Benjamin, Amsterdam and New York, 1965).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Bunge,Foundations of Physics (Springer, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Einstein, H. A. Lorentz, H. Weyl, and H. Minkowski,The Principle of Relativity, A collection of original memoirs on the special and general theory of relativity (Originally published Methuen, London, 1923; reprinted by Dover Publications, New York).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Grünbaum,Philosophical Problems of Space and Time (Knopf, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Grünbaum,Geometry and Chronometry in Philosophical Perspective (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1968).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. A. Milne,Kinematic Relativity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1948).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Möller,The Theory of Relativity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1951).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Nevanlinna,Raum, Zeit und Relativität (Birkhäuserverlag, Basel and Stuttgart, 1964).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. P. Ney,Electromagnetism and Relativity (Harper and Row, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Papapetrou,Spezielle Relativitätstheorie (DVW, Berlin, 1955).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. J. Prokhovnik,The Logic of Special Relativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1967).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Reichenbach,The Philosophy of Space and Time (Dover, New York, 1958).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. F. Taylor and J. A. Wheeler,Space-Time Physics (Freeman, San Francisco and London, 1966).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Törnebohm,A Logical Analysis of the Theory of Relativity (Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1952).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Törnebohm,Fysik och Filosofi (Physics and Philosophy) (Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1957).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Törnebohm,Concepts and Principles in Space-Time Theory within Enstein's Special Theory of Relativity (Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1963).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Törnebohm, A foundational study of Einstein's space-time theory,Scientia 104, no. 687–688 (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Håkan Törnebohm
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for the Theory of ScienceUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations