Foundations of Physics

, Volume 8, Issue 1–2, pp 103–116 | Cite as

On the consequences of Einstein locality

  • F. Selleri
Article

Abstract

After some considerations about the equivalence of the objective local theories to the deterministic theories of Bell's type, a simple and systematic way to deduce inequalities from Einstein locality is introduced: All the inequalities deduced by Bell and by other authors, as well as several new ones, are so obtained. Some theorems are proven which show how striking the difference is at small angles between a correlation function satisfying Einstein locality and the quantum mechanical one. Experiments at small angles involve weaker additional assumptions than those used up to now in experimental research on Bell's inequality.

Keywords

Correlation Function Small Angle Experimental Research Additional Assumption Local Theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Bohr,Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, N.J., 1951); B. d'Espagnat,Conceptions de la Physique Contemporaine (Hermann, Paris, 1965).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1965).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. S. Bell and B. d'Espagnat, Introductory talk to the Thinkshop on Physics (April 18–23, 1976), held in Erice.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. P. Wigner,Am. J. Phys. 38, 1005 (1970); J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne,Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974); D. Eberhard, to be published.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Edwards and L. E. Ballantine,Nuovo Cimento 34B, 91 (1976); A. Garuccio and F. Selleri,Nuovo Cimento 36B, 176 (1976).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. de Broglie,J. Phys. Rad. 20, 963 (1959), esp. §2; M. Mugur-Schächter,Ann. Fond. L. de Broglie 1, 94 (1976); A. Szczepański,Found. Phys. 6, 427 (1976).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Gutkowski and G. Masotto,Nuovo Cimento 22B, 121 (1974).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. E. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt,Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. d'Espagnat,Phys. Rev. D 11, 1424 (1975).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. M. Pearle,Phys. Rev. D 2, 1418 (1970).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Lamehi-Rachti, thesis, Université de Paris-Sud (1976).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser,Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972; R. A. Holt and F. M. Pipkin, unpublished preprint (1974); J. F. Clauser,Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1223 (1976); E. S. Fry and R. C. Thomson,Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 465 (1976); G. Faraciet al.; Nuovo Cimento Lett. 9, 607 (1974); L. R. Kasday, J. D. Ullman, and C. S. Wu,Nuovo Cimento,25B, 633 (1975); M. Bruno, M. d'Agostino, and C. Maroni, Univ. of Bologna, Preprint (1976); M. Lamehi-Rachti and W. Mittig,Phys. Rev. D 14, 2543 (1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Selleri
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Fisica dell'Università di Bari, INFNSezione di Bari

Personalised recommendations