Abstract
This study explores the extent and consistency of heavy use of acute psychiatric inpatient services among Medicaid recipients across five years and four sites. Approximately 35% of inpatient service users account for approximately 75% of the dollars spent on inpatient services across place and time. Heavy users are distinct from non-heavy users in being comprise of more children and adolescents, in being disproportionately white, and in having more severe disabilities. The study findings are discussed in the context of the planning of appropriate services for this patient subgroup.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birch and Davis Associates. (1987, July).External assessment of the Health Pass Program. Final Report. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
Goldfinger, S.M., Hopkin, J.T., & Surber, R.W. (1984). Treatment resisters or system resisters? Toward a better service system for acute care recidivists. In B. Pepper & H. Ryglewicz (Eds.),Advances in treating the young adult chronic patient. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 21. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hadley, T.R., McGurrin, M.C., Pulice, R.T., & Holohean, E.J. (1990). Using fiscal data to identify heavy service users.Psychiatric Quaterly, 61, 41–48.
Holohean, E.J., Pulice, R.T., & Donahue, S.A. (1991). Utilization of acute inpatient psychiatric services: “Heavy users” in New York State.Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 18, 173–181.
Surber, R.W., Winkler, E.I., Monteleone, M., Havassey, B.E., Goldfinger, S.M., & Hopkin, J.T. (1987) Characteristics of high users of acute psychiatric inpatient services.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 38, 1112–1114.
Surles, R.C., & McGurrin, M.C. (1987) Increased use of psychiatric emergency services.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 38, 401–405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hadley, T.R., Culhane, D.P. & McGurrin, M.C. Identifying and tracking “heavy users” of acute psychiatric inpatient services. Adm Policy Ment Health 19, 279–290 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708320
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708320