Skip to main content
Log in

Projective measures in the clinical evaluation of sexually abused children

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry and Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the use of human figure drawings as a strategy for assessing clinically relevant experiences of sexually abused children. Clinical issues relevant to the use of human figure drawings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goodenough, F:Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drucker, J, & Shapiro, C: “First Scribbles: The Emergence of an ego function,”Amer Acad Child Psychiatr Vol.18 No. 4: 620–646, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Koppitz, E.Psychological evaluation of children's human figure drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burgess, A, & Laszlo, A: “When the prosecutrix is a child: The victim consultant in cases of sexual assault.” In E. Viano (Ed.)Victims & Society. Washington, D.C.: Visage Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sturner, R, & Rothbaum F: “The effects of stress on children's human figure drawings.”J Clin Psychol Vol. 36, No. 1: 324–331, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas, J“Yes, you can help a sexually abused child.” RN Vol. 43, No. 8: 23–29, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burgess, A, Holmstrom, L & McCausland, M: “Child sexual assault by a family member: Divided Loyalty,”Victimology, Vol. 2 (Summer): 236–250, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kellogg, R:Analyzing children's art. Palo Alto: National Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klepsh, M, Logie, L:Children draw and tell: An introduction to the projective uses of childrens human figure drawings. New York: Brunner/Mazel, Inc., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hjorth, CW, Harway, M: The body image of physically abused and normal adolescents.J Clin Psychiatr 37 863–866, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Adams-Tucker, C.: Early treatment of child incest victim.Amer J Psychother 38: 505–516, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stemer, CJ:Art therapy: A new use in the diagnosis and treatment of sexually abused children. Sexual abuse of children: Selected Readings: 54–63, Washington, D.C., NCCAN, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mischel, W:Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Howard, KI: The convergent and discriminant validation of ipsative ratings from three projective instruments.J Clin Psychol 18: 183–188, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lubin, B, Wallis, RR, & Paine, C: Patterns of psychological test usage in the United States: 1935–1969.Prof Psychol 2: 70–74, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nunally, J:Psychometric Theory 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, TW & Veltkamp, LJ: Use of fables in clinical assessment of contested child custody.Child Psychiatry and Hum Develop,16(4): 1986.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, T.W., Veltkamp, L.J. & Janson, D. Projective measures in the clinical evaluation of sexually abused children. Child Psych Hum Dev 18, 47–57 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706529

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706529

Keywords

Navigation