Ethics of administration: The California crisis

  • Milton Greenblatt
Report

Summary

Administrators encounter problems in the ethical sphere substantially different from those encountered by personnel involved mainly in the diadic therapeutic relationship. Although they can never neglect their ultimate responsibility for the individual patient's welfare, it is in the broader reaches of that responsibility that they become involved in local and regional economics, politics, and health policy.

Many of the administrator's problems center around lack of resources for maintenance of quality care, progressive erosion of that level of care over time, increasing threats to humanitarian standards and ideals, and the ethical and moral obligations related to their numerous constituencies.

Thus, inequitable access to health care, the favoring of clients with good insurance coverage, discriminations in direct service due to crowded facilities, undue physical and mental risks borne by service staff, unavoidable flouting of legal or regulatory standards, the compromising of professional integrity and ideals—all burden the ethical and judicial consciousness of the administrator.

In addition, pursuit of one's duty to the public versus one's own institution is worrisome, particularly when untoward events occur in one's institution for which one may take blame. There is also the decision if and when the administrator should take social/political action after other measures have failed and the situation has deteriorated to unacceptable levels.

Keywords

Regional Economic Moral Obligation Good Insurance Coverage Therapeutic Relationship Regulatory Standard 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Annas, G.J. (1974). The hospital: A human rights wasteland.The Civil Liberties Review, 1, 9–29.Google Scholar
  2. Bronzan, B. (March 24, 1989). [Letter to the editor].Los Angeles Times, Section, 2, p. 6.Google Scholar
  3. Callahan, D. (1980). Shattuck lecture: Contemporary biomedical ethics.New England Jounal of Medicine, 302, 1228–1233.Google Scholar
  4. Callahan, D. (1987).Setting limits: Medical goals in an aging society. New York: Simon & Shuster.Google Scholar
  5. Galbraith, J.F. (1983).The anatomy of power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  6. Greenblatt, M., Sloan, R.B., Miller, M.H. Thomas, C.S. & Titus, E.D. (1987). Declaration of conscience.Southern California Psychiatric Society Newsletter, 35, 4–6.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, L.R., & Parlour, R.R. (Eds.). (1981).Wyatt v. Stickney: Retrospect and prospect. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  8. Kane, T. (1988, April).Systematic discrimination: A strategy for survival. Paper presented at the American College of Mental Health Administration, Vermont.Google Scholar
  9. Lake v. Cameron, 364 F 2d 657 (D.C. Cir. 1966).Google Scholar
  10. Nisbet, R. (1975).The twilight of authority. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Redlich, F., & Mollica, R.F. (1976). Overview: Ethical issues in contemporary psychiatry.American Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 125–136.Google Scholar
  12. Redlich, F., & Pope, K.E. (1980). Editorial: Ethics of mental health training.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168, 709–714.Google Scholar
  13. Rouse, v. Cameron, 373F 2d 481 (D.C. Cir. 1966).Google Scholar
  14. Sider, R.C. (1987). Ethical issues in inpatient practice.Psychiatric Medicine, 4, 445–454.Google Scholar
  15. Winters v. Miller, 446 F 2d 65 (2nd Cir. 1971).Google Scholar
  16. Wyatt v. Stickney, 325 F. Supp. 781.784 (M.D. Ala 1971).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milton Greenblatt
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The Univ. of California at Los AngelesSylmar
  2. 2.Chief of Psychiatry, Los Angeles County-Olive View Medical CenterSylmar

Personalised recommendations