Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 10, Issue 10, pp 797–803 | Cite as

Justice in preferential hiring

  • M. S. Singer
  • A. E. Singer
Article

Abstracts

This paper reports studies designed to examine perceptions of preferential selection. Subjects evaluated the fairness of hypothetical cases of selection decisions based on either candidate sex or ethnic origin. A within-subjects design and a between-subjects design yielded convergent results showing that (1) preferential selection was perceived as unfair, irrespective of respondent sex or the basis for the preferential treatment (i.e., candidate sex or ethnic origin), (2) the level of perceived injustice was directly related to the discrepancy in merits between the successful minority candidate and the more qualified yet unsuccessful majority candidate, and (3) the provision of either an “ethical” or “legislative” justification for the selection decisions further exacerbated feelings of injustice. Possible interpretations for the findings and practical implications of the study were then discussed.

Keywords

Economic Growth Practical Implication Preferential Treatment Ethnic Origin Hypothetical Case 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bies, R. J.: 1987a, ‘The Predicament of Injustice: The Management of Moral Outrage’, in L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw, (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 9) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 289–319.Google Scholar
  2. Bies, R. J.: 1987b, ‘Beyond Voice: The Influence of Decision-Maker Justification and Sincerity on Procedural Fairness Judgments’,Representative Research in Social Psychology 17, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  3. Bies, R. J. and Shapiro, D. L.: 1988, ‘Voice and Justification: Their Influence on Procedural Fairness Judgments’,Academy of Management Journal 31, pp. 676–685.Google Scholar
  4. Black, V.: 1974, ‘The Erosion of Legal Principles in the Creation of Legal Policies’,Ethics 84, pp. 72–74.Google Scholar
  5. Brehm, J. W.: 1966,A Theory of Psychological Reactance (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  6. Broxhill, B.: 1972, ‘The Morality of Reparations’,Social Theory and Practice 2, pp. 113–122.Google Scholar
  7. Chacko, T. L.: 1982, ‘Women and Equal Employment Opportunity: Some Unintended Effects’,Journal of Applied Psychology 67, pp. 119–123.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, C.: 1975, ‘Race and the Constitution’,The Nation 8 Feb., 1975.Google Scholar
  9. Cronbach, L. J., Yalow, E. and Schaeffer, G. A.: 1980, ‘A Mathematical Structure for Analyzing Fairness in Selection’,Personnel Psychology 33, pp. 693–704.Google Scholar
  10. Fiss, O. M.: 1976, ‘Groups and the Equal Protection Clause’,Philisophy and Public Affairs 5, pp. 150–151.Google Scholar
  11. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D. and Robinson, T.: 1983, ‘Relative Deprivation and Procedural Justifications’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, pp. 268–273.Google Scholar
  12. Garrett, T. M. and Klonoski, R. J.: 1986,Business Ethics (2nd Ed.) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  13. Goldman, A. H.: 1975, ‘Limits to the Justification of Reverse Discrimination’,Social Theory and Practice 3, pp. 110–113.Google Scholar
  14. Goldman, A. H.: 1976, ‘Affirmative Action’,Philosophy and Public Affairs 5, p. 187.Google Scholar
  15. Greenberg, J.: 1987, ‘A Taxonomy of Organisational Justice Theories’,Academy of Management Review 12, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
  16. Gross, A. L. and Su W.: 1975, ‘Defining a ‘Fair’ or ‘Unbiased’ Selection Model: A Question of Utilities’,Journal of Applied Psychology 60, pp. 345–351.Google Scholar
  17. Heilman, M. E. and Herlihy, J. N.: 1984, ‘Affirmative Action, Negative Reaction? Some Moderating Conditions’,Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 33, pp. 204–213.Google Scholar
  18. Heilman, M. E., Simon, M. C. and Repper, D. P.: 1987, ‘Intentionally Favored, Unintentionally Harmed? Impact of Sex-based Preferential Selection on Self-perceptions and Self-evaluations’,Journal of Applied Psychology 72, pp. 62–68.Google Scholar
  19. Jacobson, M. B. and Koch W.: 1977, ‘Women as Leaders: Performance Evaluation as a Function of Method of Leader Selection’,Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 20, pp. 149–157.Google Scholar
  20. Karst, K. L. and Horowitz, H. W.: 1974, ‘Affirmative Action and Equal Protection’,Virginia Law Review 60, pp. 955–974.Google Scholar
  21. Kennedy, R.: 1986, ‘Persuasion and Distrust: A Comment in the Affirmative Action Debate’,Harvard Law Review 99, pp. 1327–1334.Google Scholar
  22. Martin, J.: 1981, ‘Relative Deprivation: A Theory of Distributive Justice for an Era of Shrinking Resources’, in L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw, (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 3) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 53–107.Google Scholar
  23. Minas, A. C.: 1977, ‘How Reverse Discrimination Compensates Women’,Ethics 88, pp. 74–79.Google Scholar
  24. Nagel, T.: 1973, ‘Equal Treatment and Compensatory Discrimination’,Philosophy and Public Affairs 2, pp. 348–363.Google Scholar
  25. Newton, L. H.: 1973, ‘Reverse Discrimination as Unjustified’,Ethics 83, pp. 308–312.Google Scholar
  26. Nickel, J. W.: 1974, ‘Classification by Race in Compensatory Programs’,Ethics 84, pp. 146–150.Google Scholar
  27. Nickel, J. W.: 1975, ‘Preferential Policies in Hiring and Admissions: A Jurisprudential Approach’,Columbia Law Review 75, pp. 534–558.Google Scholar
  28. Rawls, J.: 1971,A Theory of Justice (Clarendon Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  29. Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. A. and Kirsch, M.: 1984, ‘Meta-analyses of Validity Studies Published Between 1964 and 1982 and the Investigation of Study Characteristics’,Personnel Psychology 37, pp. 407–422.Google Scholar
  30. Schmitt, N. and Noe, R. A.: 1986, ‘Personnel Selection and Equal Employment Opportunity’, in C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson, (Eds.),International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  31. Schmitt, N.: 1989, ‘Fairness in employment selection’, in M. Smith and I. Robertson (Eds.),Advances in Personnel Selection and Assessment (Wiley, Chichester).Google Scholar
  32. Shaw, B.: 1988, ‘Affirmative Action: An Ethical Evaluation’,Journal of Business Ethics 7, pp. 763–770.Google Scholar
  33. Sher, G.: 1975, ‘Justifying Reverse Discrimination in Employment’,Philosophy and Public Affairs 4, pp. 159–170.Google Scholar
  34. Sowell, T., 1978, ‘Are Quotas Good for Blacks?’,Commentary 65, pp. 39–43.Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, P. W.: 1973, ‘Reverse Discrimination and Compensatory Justice’Analysis 33, pp. 177–182.Google Scholar
  36. Thomson, J. J.: 1973, ‘Preferential Hiring’,Philosophy and Public Affairs 2, p. 381.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. S. Singer
    • 1
  • A. E. Singer
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of PsychologyUniversity of CanterburyChristchurch 1New Zealand
  2. 2.Dept. of ManagementUniversity of CanterburyChristchurch 1New Zealand

Personalised recommendations