Skip to main content
Log in

The ethical implications of the straight-commission compensation system — An agency perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the role of the straight-commissioned salesperson in the context of agency theory and asserts that because the agent acts to benefit two principals, potential conflicts of interest arise. Temporal differences in receipt of rewards create a major conflict, while the firm's exhibition of both espoused and actual behaviors and information asymmetries intensify this conflict. Finally, in light of these inconsistencies, the ethical implications of the straight-commission compensation system are examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, J.: 1958,How To Do Things With Words (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, S. and Evans, J. H. III: 1983, ‘Predecision Information and Participative Management Control Systems’,Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn, pp. 371–395.

  • Bird, F., Westley, F. and Waters, J. A.: 1989, ‘The Uses of Moral Talk: Why Do Managers Talk Ethics?’,Journal of Business Ethics 8(1), pp. 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J.: 1981, ‘Communication in Agencies’,Bell Journal of Economics, Autumn, pp. 661–674.

  • DeConinck, J. B. and Good, D. J.: 1989, ‘Perceptual Differences of Sales Practitioners and Students Concerning Ethical Behavior’,Journal of Business Ethics 8(9), pp. 667–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D. and O'Hara M.: 1988, ‘Contracts and Asymmetric Information in the Theory of the Firm’,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 9(3), pp. 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M.: 1988, ‘Agency- and Institutional-theory Explanations: The Case of Retail Sales Compensation’,Academy of Management Journal 31(3), pp. 488–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M.: 1989, ‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review’,Academy of Management Review 14(1), pp. 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C.: 1983, ‘Separation of Ownership and Control’,Journal of Law and Economics 26, pp. 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J. U.: 1964, ‘An Optimal Plan for Salesmen's Compensation’,Journal of Marketing Research 1, pp. 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. R.: 1979, ‘Moral Hazard and Observability’,Bell Journal of Economics, Spring, pp. 74–91.

  • Hopwood, A.: 1976,Accounting and Human Behavior (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, J. O.: 1987, ‘The Ethics of the New Finance’,Journal of Business Ethics 6, pp. 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H.: 1976, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure’,Journal of Financial Economics 3, pp. 305–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, W.-O., and Kwon, Y. K.: 1988, ‘Disclosure When the Market is Unsure of Information Endowment of Managers’,Journal of Accounting Research 26(1), pp. 146–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1964,Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. H. J. Paton (Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S.: 1975, ‘On the Folly of Rewarding A, while hoping for B’,Academy of Management Journal 18(4), pp. 769–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laderman, J. M. and Hawkins, C.: 1990, ‘How Much Should You Trust Your Analyst’,Business Week, July 23, pp. 54–56.

  • Laderman, J. M. and Foust, D.: 1990, ‘Did Donald Trump Shoot The Messenger’,Business Week, July 23, p. 56.

  • Mitnick, B. M.: 1975a, ‘The Theory of Agency: The Policing ‘Paradox’ and Regulatory Behavior’,Public Choice, Winter, 27–42.

  • Mitnick, B. M.: 1975b, ‘The Theory of Agency: The Fiduciary Norm’,Paper presented at the 1975 Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Mitnick, B. M.: 1976, ‘The Theory of Agency: A Framework’,Ohio State University Working Paper Series, WP pp. 75–17.

  • Mitnick, B. M.: 1985, ‘Agency Problems and Organization Theory and Design: The Bureaucrat as Agent’,Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.

  • Mitnick, B. M.: 1987, ‘The Theory of Agency and Organizational Analysis’,University of Pittsburgh Working Paper Series WP-639.

  • Mitnick, B. M. and Backoff, R. W.: 1984, ‘The Incentive Relation In Implementation, In George C. Edwards III (Ed.)Public Policy Implementation of Stuart Nagel (Ed.)Public Policy Studies: a multi-volume treatise (JAI Press: Greenwich, CT), pp. 59–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalebuff, B. J. and Stiglitz, J. E.: 1983, ‘Prizes and Incentives Towards A General Theory of Compensation and Competition’,Bell Journal of Economics 14(1), pp. 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penno, M.: 1984, ‘Asymmetry of Pre-Decision Information and Managerial Accounting’,Journal of Accounting Research 22(1), pp. 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C.: 1986,Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay (3rd edition) (Random House: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poser, N. S.: 1988, ‘Chinese Wall or Emperor's New Clothes? Regulating Conflicts of Interest of Securities Firms in the U.S. and the U.K.’,Michigan Yearbook of International Legal Studies (Symposium: Internationalization of the Securities Markets IX, pp. 91–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, H. Ed.: 1970,Kant's Political Writings (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochaix, L.: 1989, ‘Information Asymmetry and Search in the Market for Physician's Services’,Journal of Health Economics 8(1), pp. 53–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. A.: 1973, ‘The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem’,American Economic Review 62, pp. 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, S. M.: 1988, ‘New Laws Protecting Sales Reps’,Sales and Marketing Management 140, pp. 82 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.: 1969,Speech Acts: An Essay In The Philosophy of Language (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. P.: 1984,Wayward Capitalists: Target of the Securities Exchange Commission (Yale University Press: New Haven).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. P.: 1985, ‘Policing Trust’, In C. D. Shearring and P. C. Stennings (Eds)Private Policing (Sage Publications), pp. 194–220.

  • Shapiro, S. P.: 1987, ‘The Social Control Of Impersonal Trust’,American Sociological Review 93, pp. 623–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibson, R. E.: 1981,Compensation (revised edition) (AMACOM: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siconolfi, M.: 1989, ‘Merrill's Bonus Plan Yields Controversy: Brokers Spurred To Sell Firm's Line’,Wall Street Journal, February 15, pg. C1.

  • Siconolfi, M.: 1988, ‘S.E.C. Studies Closed-End ‘Mystery'’’,Wall Street Journal, May 23, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siconolfi, M.: 1990, ‘Merrill, In Switch, Puts All Funds It Peddles On a Level Selling Field’,Wall Street Journal, January, pg. C1.

  • Simon, H. A.: 1955, ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, pp. 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. G.: 1982,Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. J., Jr. and Fay, C. H.: 1983,Compensation Theory and Practice (Kent Publishing Co.: Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E.: 1981, ‘The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach’,American Journal of Sociology 87, pp. 548–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. S.: 1985, ‘Participative Budgetting: The Effects of Risk Aversion and Asummetric Information on Budgetary Slack’,Journal of Accounting Research 23(2), pp. 829–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zey-Ferrell, M., Weaver, K. M. and Ferrell, O. C.: 1979, ‘Predicting Unethical Behavior Among Marketing Practitioners’,Human Relations 32(7), pp. 557–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zey-Ferrell, M. and Ferrell, O. C.: 1982, ‘Role-Set Configuration and Opportunity and Predictors of Unethical Behavior in Organizations’,Human Relations 35(7), pp. 587–604.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Nancy Kurland is a doctoral student at the Katz Graduate School of Business of the University of Pittsburgh. She has had extensive experience as a straight-commissioned salesperson, including her most recent position as an investment broker for a major Wall Street firm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurland, N.B. The ethical implications of the straight-commission compensation system — An agency perspective. J Bus Ethics 10, 757–766 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705710

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705710

Keywords

Navigation