Abstract
The increasing use of technological advances in business operations very often leads to the displacement of the employee whose skills become obsolete in light of such advances. There is no doubt that the interests of both company and employee are significantly affected by the implementation of laborsaving devices. Given that those interests are pursued in an environment which is usually, if not essentially, competitive, then there arises the serious question of what rights should be accorded the employee and the company in the event that the employee is likely to be displaced by technological innovation. I argue that, given the constraints of a competitive environment, certain rights might be justified through a very limited application of the highly morally intuitive principles of utility, respect for persons, fairness, and the honoring of contracts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Alcott S. Arthur is Lecturer in Philosophy at Howard University, Washington, D.C. His most important publication is his doctoral dissertation: The Problem of Providing Adequate Grounds for Political Obligation,published by Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan (1981).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arthur, A. ROBOTS, RIFs, and rights. J Bus Ethics 4, 197–203 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705619
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705619