Skip to main content
Log in

ROBOTS, RIFs, and rights

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing use of technological advances in business operations very often leads to the displacement of the employee whose skills become obsolete in light of such advances. There is no doubt that the interests of both company and employee are significantly affected by the implementation of laborsaving devices. Given that those interests are pursued in an environment which is usually, if not essentially, competitive, then there arises the serious question of what rights should be accorded the employee and the company in the event that the employee is likely to be displaced by technological innovation. I argue that, given the constraints of a competitive environment, certain rights might be justified through a very limited application of the highly morally intuitive principles of utility, respect for persons, fairness, and the honoring of contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Alcott S. Arthur is Lecturer in Philosophy at Howard University, Washington, D.C. His most important publication is his doctoral dissertation: The Problem of Providing Adequate Grounds for Political Obligation,published by Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan (1981).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arthur, A. ROBOTS, RIFs, and rights. J Bus Ethics 4, 197–203 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705619

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705619

Keywords

Navigation