Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 219–226 | Cite as

Professional conduct and professional misconduct: A framework and its application to the accounting profession

  • Ann Neale
Article

Abstract

Recently there has been increased attention paid to the behaviour of those who call themselves professionals. The idea of ‘acceptable professional conduct’ incorporates the expectations of a number of groups affected by the activities of professionals. The framework of professional behaviour considered acceptable at a point in time is an equilibrium among these groups' expectations. This paper argues that shifts in the expectations of any of these groups will disturb this equilibrium. This process of disequilibrium and change leads to altered views of professional behaviour. Professional misconduct or unprofessional behaviour, that is, the failure to meet expectations, is inherent in the underlying framework of a profession.

The framework is applied to the public (chartered) accounting profession, where the interacting groups are accounting professionals, their clients and the general public. Current issues of debate about professional behaviour are identifiable as consequences of altered expectations about acceptable behaviour. Acceptable conduct has become misconduct (and vice versa) and written rules of conduct conflict with unwritten rules.

The paper concludes with two interrelated issues for further research. A new equilibrium is considered; and permanent change in the framework of the professions, the groups in the professional structure and the mechanisms of their interaction, is addressed.

Keywords

Economic Growth General Public Interact Group Current Issue Permanent Change 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bayles, M. D.: 1981,Professional Ethics (Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  2. Chartered Accountants Joint Ethics Committee (CAJEC): 1992,Predatory Pricing, A Discussion Paper (Institutes of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Chartered Accountants in Ireland).Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. R. and L. W. Pant: 1991, ‘Beyond Bean Counting: Establishing High Ethical Standards in the Public Accounting Profession’,Journal of Business Ethics 10, 45–56.Google Scholar
  4. Donaldson, J.: 1990,Key Issues in Business Ethics (Academic Press, London).Google Scholar
  5. Flint, D.: 1982, ‘Social and Ethical Issues in Auditing’, in A. G. Hopwood, M. Bromwich and J. L. Shaw (eds.),Auditing Research: Issues and Opportunities (Pitman, London), pp. 81–98.Google Scholar
  6. Gilligan, C.: 1977, ‘In a Different Voice: Women's Conceptions of Self and Morality’,Harvard Educational Review 47(4), 481–517.Google Scholar
  7. Gorlin, R. A.: 1986,Codes of Professional Conduct (Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., Washington D.C.).Google Scholar
  8. Hauptman, R. and F. Hill: 1991, ‘Deride, Abide or Dissent: On the Ethics of Professional Conduct’,Journal of Business Ethics 10, 37–44.Google Scholar
  9. Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia (ICAA): 1990,Rules of Ethical Conduct. ICAAGoogle Scholar
  10. Langenderfer, H. Q. and J. W. Rockness: 1990, ‘Integrating Ethics into the Accounting Curriculum: Issues, Problems and Solutions’ in AAA, 2.1–2.11.Google Scholar
  11. Moberg, D. J. and M. J. Meyer: 1990, ‘A Deontological Analysis of Peer Relations in Organisations’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, 863–877.Google Scholar
  12. Mount, E.: 1990,Professional Ethics in Context (Westminster/John Knox Press, Louisville, Kentucky).Google Scholar
  13. Owens, J.: 1983, ‘Business Ethics in the College Classroom’,Journal of Business Education,58, 258–262.Google Scholar
  14. Paradice, D. B. and R. M. Dejoie: 1991, ‘The Ethical Decision-making Processes of Information System Workers’,Journal of Business Ethics 10, 1–21.Google Scholar
  15. Raiborn, C. A. and D. Payne: 1990, ‘Corporate Codes Of Conduct: A Collective Conscience and Continuum’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, 879–889.Google Scholar
  16. Schlachter, P. J.: 1990, ‘Organisational Influences on Individual Ethical Behaviour in Public Accounting’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, 839–853.Google Scholar
  17. Shaked, A. and J. Sutton: 1981, ‘The Self-Regulating Profession’,Review of Economic Studies XLVIII(2), 217–234.Google Scholar
  18. Stanga, K. G. and R. A. Turpen: 1991, ‘Ethical Judgements on Selected Accounting Issues: An Empirical Study’,Journal of Business Ethics 10, 739–747.Google Scholar
  19. ‘Who Will Audit the Auditors?’,Economist, 15 July 1989.Google Scholar
  20. Willingham, J. J. and D. R. Carmichael: 1968, ‘The Professional Auditing Subculture’,Abacus (Dec.), 153–163.Google Scholar
  21. Witten, M.: 1990, ‘Guardians on Guard’,CA Magazine 23(11), 27–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Neale
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations