Skip to main content
Log in

Improved materials for blood-contacting applications: blends of sulphonated and non-sulphonated polyurethanes

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Propyl sulphonate groups were grafted on to the urethane nitrogens of Pellethane 2363-80A at three levels: 1.2, 14, and 50%. Blends with an effective level of 1.2 and 14% were made by blending the 14 and 50% sulphonated polyurethanes with the unsubstituted material. Tensile testing was performed on the materials in both their dry and hydrated state. The blend materials exhibited a small improvement in tensile strength over their bulk analogues. Dynamic contact angle and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) showed an enrichment of sulphonate groups at the surface of the blend materials compared to bulk samples of the same overall composition. Canineex vivo shunt experiments revealed fewer platelets adherent and less platelet spreading on the blend materials than on the bulk materials with the same level of sulphonation. This suggests that sulphonated polyurethanes can be developed that have improved blood compatibility while maintaining good physical properties in an aqueous environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. H. BORETOS and W. S. PIERCE,Science 158 (1967) 1481.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. D. LELAH and S. L. COOPER, “Polyurethanes in medicine” (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. D. EBERT, E. S. LEE, J. DENERIS and S. W. KIM,ACS Adv. Chem. Series 199 (1982) 161.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. FOUGNOT, D. LABARRE, J. JOZEFONVICZ and M. JOZEFONWICZ, in “Macromolecular biomaterials”, edited by G. Williams and P. Ducheyne (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1984) p. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. JOZEFONWICZ and J. JOZEFONVICZ,Pure Appl. Chem. 56 (1984) 1335.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. P. SANTERRE, N. VANDERKAMP and J. L. BRASH,Trans. Soc. Biomater. 12 (1989) 113.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. G. GRASEL and S. L. COOPER,J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 23 (1989) 311.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. K. S. HWANG, T. A. SPECKHARD and S. L. COOPER,J. Macromol. Sci. Phys. B23(2 (1984) 153.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Z. OKKEMA, S. A. VISSER and S. L. COOPER,J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25 (1991) 1371.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. BOISSON-VIDAL, J. JOZEFONVICZ and J. L. BRASH, ibid.25 (1991) 67.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. H. SILVER, H. B. LIN and S. L. COOPER,Trans. Soc. Biomater. 14 (1991) 299.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. BRANDRUP and E. IMMERGUT (eds), “Polymer handbook”, 3rd Edn (Wiley, New York, 1989) p. VI: 230.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Z. OKKEMA, X.-H. YU and S. L. COOPER,Biomaterials 12 (1991) 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hergenrother, R.W., Cooper, S.L. Improved materials for blood-contacting applications: blends of sulphonated and non-sulphonated polyurethanes. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 3, 313–321 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705361

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705361

Keywords

Navigation