Summary
The development of endoscopy and the progress made in the development of biopsy and cytological methods have provided the possibility of microscopic assessment in the great majority of diseases of the internal organs. However, optimal results depend on certain requirements: (1) correct sampling methods, together with preservation (fixation, freezing) and processing of biopsies; (2) adequate clinical background information for the pathologist; (3) reporting according to international recommendations; (4) last but not least, well-qualified clinicians and pathologists. It is of paramount importance that clinicians and pathologists cooperate closely on a daily basis to guarantee effectiveness in biopsy diagnostics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anthony PP, Ishak KG, Nayak NC, Poulsen HE, Scheuer PJ, Sobin LH (1978) The morphology of cirrhosis: recommendations on definition, nomenclature, and classification by a working group sponsored by the World Health Organization. J Clin Pathol 31: 395–414
Gall FP, Hermanek P, Tonak J (eds) (1986) Chirurgische Onkologie. Histologie- und stadiengerechte Therapie maligner Tumoren. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Hermanek P (1983) Polypectomy in the colorectum. Histological and oncological aspects. Endoscopy [Suppl 1] 15: 158–161
Hermanek P (1986) Chirurgische (klinische) Pathologie. Ärztliche Notwendigkeit und wissenschaftliche Aufgabe. Fortschr Med 104: 181–184
Hermanek P (1988) Gastric carcinoma; precancerous conditions and lesions, classification, and prognosis. In: Hotz J, Meyer HJ, Schmoll HJ (eds) Gastric carcinoma. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg (in press)
Hermanek P (1988) Pathological factors governing clinical management. In: Williams GT (ed) Current topics in pathology, gastrointestinal pathology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (in press)
Hermanek P, Giedl J, Kühn H, Hübner G (1979) Bioptische Differentialdiagnose zwischen Colitis ulcerosa und Morbus Crohn. Leber Magen Darm 9: 283–288
Höfler H (1987) What's new in “in situ hybridization?” Pathol Res Pract 182: 421–430
Kajitani T, Miwa K (eds) (1979) Treatment results of stomach carcinoma in Japan, 1963–1966. (WHO-CC monograph, no 2) WHO Collaborating Center for Evaluation of Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment of Stomach Cancer, Tokyo, p 77
Mackenzie DH (1970) The differential diagnosis of fibroblastic disorders. Blackwell, Oxford Edinburgh
Marks F (1987) What's new in oncogenes and growth factors? Pathol Res Pract 182: 831–848
Riddell RH, Goldman H, Ransohoff DF, Appelmann HD, Fenoglio CM, Haggitt RC, Ahren C, Correa P, Hamilton SR, Morson BC, Sommers SC, Yardley JH (1983) Dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Standardised classification with provisional clinical applications. Hum Pathol 14: 931–969
Ross R (1987) Surgical pathology and DNA probes. Arch Pathol Lab Med 111: 20–21
Taylor CR (1986) Immunomicroscopy: a diagnostic tool for the surgical pathologist. Saunders, Philadelphia
UICC (1987) TNM Classification of malignant tumors, 4th edn. Hermanek P, Sobin LH (eds). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Underwood JCE (1987) Introduction to biopsy interpretation and surgical pathology, 2nd edn. Springer, London Berlin Heidelberg
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hermanek, P. Endoscopy and pathology. Surg Endosc 2, 251–255 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705332
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705332