Physiological strain due to load carrying in heavy footwear

  • M. Holewijn
  • R. Hens
  • L. J. A. Wammes
Article

Summary

To determine the effects of wearing heavy footwear on physiological responses five male and five female subjects were measured while walking on a treadmill (4, 5.25, and 6.5 km·h−1) with different external loads (barefooted, combat boots, and waist pack). While walking without an external load the oxygen uptake, as a percentage of maximal oxygen uptake (%\(\dot V\)O2max) of the men increased from 25%\(\dot V\)O2max at 4 km·h−1 to 31%\(\dot V\)O2max at 5.25 km·h−1 and to 42%\(\dot V\)O2max at 6.5 km·h−1. The women had a significantly higher oxygen uptake of 30%, 40%, and 55%\(\dot V\)O2max, respectively. In the most strenuous condition, walking at 6.5 km·h−1 with combat boots and waist pack (12 kg), the oxygen uptake for the men and women amounted to 53% and 75%\(\dot V\)O2max, respectively. The heart rate showed a similar response to the oxygen uptake, the women having a heart rate which was 15–40 beats·min−1 higher than that of the men, depending on the experimental condition. The perceived exertion was shown to be greatly dependent on the oxygen uptake. From the results a regression formula was calculated predicting the oxygen uptake depending on the mass of the footwear, walking speed and body mass. It was concluded that the mass of footwear resulted in an increase in the energy expenditure which was a factor 1.9–4.7 times greater than that of a kilogram of body mass, depending on sex and walking speed.

Key words

Energy cost Sex difference Footwear Perceived exertion Regression formula 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astrand PO, Rodahl K (1986) Textbook of work physiology. Physiological bases of exercise. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Aunola S, Alanen E, Marniemi J (1990) The relationship between cycling time to exhaustion and anaerobic threshold. Ergonomics 33: 1027–1042Google Scholar
  3. van Baak MA (1979) The physiological load during walking, cycling, running and swimming and the Cooper exercise program. Thesis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergström J, Hermansen L, Hultman E, Saltin B (1967) Diet, muscle glycogen, and physical performance. Acta Physiol Scand 71: 140–150Google Scholar
  5. Booyens J, Keatinge WR (1957) The energy expenditure by men and women walking. J Physiol 138: 165–171Google Scholar
  6. Borg GAV (1982) Psychological bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14: 377–381Google Scholar
  7. Bransford DR, Howley ET (1977) Oxygen cost of running in trained and untrained men and women. Med Sci Sports 9: 41–44Google Scholar
  8. Bunc V, Heller J (1989) Energy cost of running in similarly trained men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol 59: 178–183Google Scholar
  9. Durnin JVGA, Namyslowski L (1958) Individual variations in the energy expenditure of standard activities. J Physiol (Loud) 143: 573–578Google Scholar
  10. Durnin JVGA, Womersley J (1974) Body fat assessment from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness; measurements on 481 men and women aged from 17 to 71 years. Br J Nutr 32: 77–79Google Scholar
  11. Edwards RHT, Harris RC, Hultman E, Kaiser L, Koh D, Nordesjö LO (1972) Effect of temperature on muscle energy metabolism and endurance during successive isomeric contractions, sustained fatigue, of quadriceps muscle in man. J Physiol (Lond) 220: 335–352Google Scholar
  12. Ekblom B, Astrand PE, Saltin B, Sternborg J, Wallström B (1968) Effect of training on the circulatory response to exercise. J Appl Physiol 24: 518–528Google Scholar
  13. Falls HB, Humphrey LD (1976) Energy cost of running and walking in young women. Med Sci Sports 8: 9–13Google Scholar
  14. Fox EL, Matthews DK (1981) The physiological basis of exercise education and athletics. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, Pa.Google Scholar
  15. Frederic ECK (1983) In: Williams MH (ed) Ergogenic aids in sport. Human kinetics Publishers, Champaign, Ill.Google Scholar
  16. Graves JE, Martin AD, Miltenberger LA, Pollock M (1988) Physiological response to walking with hand weights, wrist weights, and ankle weights. Med Sci Sports Exerc 20: 265–271Google Scholar
  17. Holewijn M (1990) Physiological strain due to load carriage. Eur J Appl Physiol 61: 237–245Google Scholar
  18. Howley ET, Glover ME (1977) The caloric costs of running and walking one mile for men and women. Med Sci Sports 6: 235–237Google Scholar
  19. Hurley BF, Nemeth PM, Martin WH, Hagberg JM, Dalsky GP, Hollarszy JO (1986) Muscle triglyceride utilization during exercise, effect of training. J Appl Physiol 60: 562–567Google Scholar
  20. Jones BH, Toner MM, Daniels WL, Knapik JJ (1984) The energy cost and heart-rate response of trained and untrained subjects walking and running in shoes and boots. Ergonomics 28: 895–902Google Scholar
  21. Jones BH, Knapik JJ, Daniels WL, Toner MM (1986) The energy cost of women walking and running in shoes and boots. Ergonomics 29: 439–443Google Scholar
  22. Legg SJ, Mahanty A (1986) Energy cost of backpacking in heavy boots. Ergonomics 29: 433–438Google Scholar
  23. Martin PE (1985) Mechanical and physiological responses to lower extremity loading during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17: 427–433Google Scholar
  24. Martin PE, Nelson RC (1986) The effect of carried loads on the walking patterns of men and women. Ergonomics 29: 1191–1202Google Scholar
  25. MacDougall JD, Reddan WG, Layton CR, Dempster JA (1974) Effects of metabolic hyperthermia on performance during heavy prolonged exercise. J Appl Physiol 36: 538–544Google Scholar
  26. McDonald I (1961) Statistical studies of recorded energy expenditure of man. Nutr Abstr Rev 31: 739–762Google Scholar
  27. Mihevic PM (1981) Sensory cues for perceived exertion: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 13: 150–163Google Scholar
  28. Noble BJ, Borg GAV, Jacobs I, Ceci R, Kaiser P (1983) A category-ratio perceived exertion scale: relationship to blood and muscle lactates and heart rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15: 523–528Google Scholar
  29. Pandolf KB, Gironni B, Goldman RF (1977) Predicting energy expenditure with loads while standing or walking very slowly. J Appl Physiol 43: 393–399Google Scholar
  30. Robertson RJ, Caspersen CJ, Allison TG, Skrinar GS, Abbott RA, Metz KF (1982) Differentiated perceptions of exertion and energy costs of young women while carrying loads. Eur J Appl Physiol 49: 69–78Google Scholar
  31. Soule RG, Goldman RF (1969) Energy cost of loads carried on the head, hands or feet. J Appl Physiol 27: 687–690Google Scholar
  32. Strydom NB, Graan CH, Morrison JF, Viljoen JH, Heyns AJ (1968) The influence of boot weight on the energy expenditure of men walking on a treadmill and climbing steps. Int Z Physiol Arbeitsphysiol 25: 191–197Google Scholar
  33. Yamasaki M, Sasaki T, Torii M (1991) Sex difference in the pattern of lower limb movement during treadmill walking. Eur J Appl Physiol 62: 99–103Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Holewijn
    • 1
  • R. Hens
    • 1
  • L. J. A. Wammes
    • 1
  1. 1.TNO Institute for Perception, Thermal Physiology Research GroupDE SoesterbergThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Netherlands Aerospace Medical CentreDE SoesterbergThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations