Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 23, Issue 2–3, pp 219–237 | Cite as

Farming systems research for agroforestry extension

  • P. E. Hildebrand
  • B. K. Singh
  • B. C. Bellows
  • E. P. Campbell
  • B. A. Jama
Article

Abstract

Farming systems research and extension (FSRE), as used by the global Association for Farming Systems Research-Extension, applies to a family of methodologies used to generate, evaluate and disseminate agricultural technologies in association with farmer participation. FSRE shares many attributes with Diagnosis and Design as practiced in agroforestry. The history of FSRE is traced from 1965 to the present, showing the formalization of the methodology and its critical use in sustainable agricultural technology development. In on-farm research, a primary basis for FSRE, research and extension merge in practice. The definition of recommendation domains (a fundamental concept of FSRE) is based on analysis and interpretation of multi-environmental research results as evaluated by varied criteria.

In this paper, we present the results of three research projects to demonstrate the nature of farmer criteria for evaluation. Modified Stability Analysis (MSA) is used to demonstrate the relationship of on-farm research to specific extension messages. Design of on-farm research to make it amenable to analysis by MSA is discussed.

Key words

farming systems modified stability analysis recommendation domains sustainable agriculture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellows BC (1992) Sustainability of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) farming on steep lands in Costa Rica: an agronomic and socioeconomic assessment. PhD Dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradfield R (1966) Toward more and better food for the Filipino people and more income for her farmers. A/D/C Paper. Agricultural Development Council Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Byerlee D, Collinson M et al. (1980) Planning Technologies Appropriate to Farmers: Concepts and Procedures. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  4. Byerlee D, Harrington L and Winkelmann DL (1982) Farming systems research strategy and technology design. Amer J of Agric Econ 64: 899–904Google Scholar
  5. Chambers R (1981) Rapid rural appraisal: rationale and repertoire. Public Administration and Development 1: 95–106Google Scholar
  6. Collinson M (1972) Farm Management in Peasant Agriculture. Praeger Publishers Inc, NY (Republished in 1983 by Westview Press Inc, Boulder)Google Scholar
  7. FSSP (1987) Training, Networking and Technical Assistance: The Product and Process of the Farming Systems Support Project, 1982–1987. University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  8. Harrington LW and Tripp R (1984) Recommendation domains: a framework for on-farm research. Working Paper 02/84. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  9. Harwood RR (1975) Farmer-oriented research aimed at crop intensification. In: Proceedings of the Cropping Systems Workshop, pp 12–32. IRRI, Los Baños, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  10. Hildebrand PE (1976) Generating technology for traditional farmers: a multidisciplinary methodology. Paper presented at the Conference on: Developing Economies in Agrarian Regions: A Search for Methodology, The Rockefeller Foundation Conference Center, Bellagio, Italy. ICTA, GuatemalaGoogle Scholar
  11. Hildebrand PE (1981) Combining disciplines in rapid appraisal: the sondeo approach. Agric Administration 8: 423–432Google Scholar
  12. Hildebrand PE (1984) Modified stability analysis of farmer managed, on-farm trials. Agronomy J 76: 271–274Google Scholar
  13. Hildebrand PE (1990) Modified stability analysis and on-farm research to breed specific adaptability for ecological diversity. In: Kang MS, ed, Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding, pp 169–180. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LAGoogle Scholar
  14. Hildebrand PE (1992) The FSRE approach: the meaning and value of FSRE to promote agricultural production and the welfare of rural families. Presented at the Southern African Farming Systems Conference ‘Farming Systems Research-Extension in the 1990s: Its Relevance as a Practical Approach to Solving the Problems Faced by Farmers in Southern Africa’. Johannesburg, RSA, February 25–27Google Scholar
  15. Hildebrand PE and French EC (1974) Un sistema salvadoreño de multicultivos. Departamento de Economía Agrícola, Centro Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (CENTA), Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería. San Salvador, El SalvadorGoogle Scholar
  16. Hildebrand PE and Poey F (1985) On-Farm Agronomic Trials in Farming Systems Research and Extension. Lynne Rienner Publ Inc, Boulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  17. Hildebrand PE and Russell JT (1992) (Draft) Modified Stability Analysis: A Method for the Design, Analysis and Interpretation of On-Farm Research-Extension. Anticipated publication in 1994 by Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc, Boulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  18. Jama BA (1993) Soil fertility and soil productivity aspects of alley croppingLeucaena leucocephala andCassia siamea under semi-arid conditions at Machakos, Kenya. PhD Dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  19. Merrill-Sands D, Kaimowitz D, Sayce K and Chater S (1989) The Technology Triangle: Linking Farmers, Technology Transfer Agents, and Agricultural Researchers. ISNAR, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  20. Nordblom TL, Ahmed AKH and Potts GR (1985) Research Methodology for Livestock On-Farm Trials. IDRC, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  21. Norman DW (1975) Rationalizing mixed cropping under indigenous conditions: the example of northern Nigeria. Samaru Research Bulletin 232. Institute for Agricultural Research, Samaru, Ahmadu Bello University, NigeriaGoogle Scholar
  22. Norman DW (1976) The social scientist in farming systems research. Invited paper for the Workshop on Farming Systems Research in Mali, Institut d'Économie Rurale, BamakoGoogle Scholar
  23. Perrin RK, Winkelmann DL, Moscardi ER and Anderson JR (1976) From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  24. Poats SV, Schmink M and Spring A, eds (1988) Gender Issues in Farming Systems Research and Extension. Westview Press, Boulder and LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Raintree JB (1987) The state-of-the-art of agroforestry diagnosis and design. Agroforestry Systems 5: 219–250Google Scholar
  26. Shaner WW, Philipp PF and Schmehl WR (1982) Farming Systems Research and Development: Guidelines for Developing Countries. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  27. Singh BK (1990) Sustaining crop phosphorus nutrition of highly leached oxisols of the Amazon Basin of Brazil through use of organic amendments. PhD Dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  28. Stroup WW, Hildebrand PE and Francis CA (1991) Farmer participation for more effective research in sustainable agriculture. Food and Resource Economics Dept. Staff Paper SP91-32. University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  29. Tripp R (1991) Planned Change in Farming Systems: Progress in On-Farm Research. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  30. Tripp R and Woolley J (1989) The Planning Stage of On-Farm Research: Identifying Factors for Experimentation. CIMMYT and CIAT. Mexico, DF and Cali, ColombiaGoogle Scholar
  31. Wotowiec P, Poats SV and Hildebrand PE (1988) Research, recommendation and diffusion domains: A farming systems approach to targeting. In: Poats SV, Schmink M and Spring A, eds, 1988 Gender Issues in Farming Systems Research and Extension, pp 73–86. Westview Press, Boulder and LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Zandstra H, Swanberg K, Zulberti C and Nestel B (1979) Cáqueza: Living Rural Development. IDRC, OttawaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. E. Hildebrand
    • 1
  • B. K. Singh
    • 2
  • B. C. Bellows
    • 3
  • E. P. Campbell
    • 4
  • B. A. Jama
    • 5
  1. 1.Food and Resource Economics DepartmentUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Escuela de Agricultura de la Region Tropical Humeda (EARTH)San JoséCosta Rica
  3. 3.Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management-Collaborative Research Support Program (SANREM-CRSP), c/o NECICagayan de OroThe Philippines
  4. 4.University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  5. 5.ICRAFNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations