Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 285–302 | Cite as

Microclimate and soil moisture effects of three intercrops on the rows of a newly-planted intercropped plantation

  • P. A. Williams
  • A. M. Gordon
Article

Abstract

Trees are grown in intercropping systems for a variety of purposes including wood products, fuelwood, fruit, forage or conservation purposes. No matter what end use, different tree/crop combinations interact differently resulting in differential growth rates of the trees during establishment. Preliminary work has shown that seedling growth and survival of trees are related to their intercrop and the results of this study help to explain these findings. Soil water potential, soil and air temperature, relative humidity, windspeed, and light (photosynthetic photon flux density — PPFD) were measured throughout the growing season in the clean-weeded treerows within crops of corn, soybeans and winter wheat. Crop height and biomass were also measured. This study was conducted during the 1992 growing season which was unusually cool and wet from mid June into the winter. The growth of winter wheat, measured by crop height and above-ground biomass, was earlier in the season than that of soybeans and corn, and this pattern affected the environmental conditions in the tree rows. Soil water potential was affected with associated effects on soil temperature (in combination with other factors). Crop height drastically reduced windspeed in the corn treatment from July through winter, also affecting PPFD and soil temperature later in the year. Although many microclimate differences were relatively small, data from subsequent years as well as associated soil moisture studies and additional years will help to further elucidate these relationships.

Key words

intercropping microclimate soil moisture competition temperate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball DH, Stonehouse DP and Gordon AM (1991) The economics of two agroforestry technologies as a diversification strategy for tobacco farms in southern Ontario. In: Garrett HE (ed) Proc of the Second Conference on Agroforestry in North America, Springfield, Missouri, USA, August 18–21, 1991, pp 392–403Google Scholar
  2. Ballare CL, Scopel AL and Sanchez RA (1990) Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies. Science 247: 329–323Google Scholar
  3. Brown DM (1978) Hear units for corn in Southern Ontario. Ont Min of Ag & Food Inf Factsheet 78-063, 5 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Buck AL (1981) New equations for computing vapour pressure and enhancement factor. J App Met 20: 1527–1532Google Scholar
  5. Cannell MGR and Grace J (1993) Competition for light: detection, measurement, and quantification. Can J For Res 23: 1969–1979Google Scholar
  6. Cutter BE and Garrett HE (1993) Wood quality in alleycropped eastern black walnut. Agroforestry Systems 22: 25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garrett HE and Kurtz WP (1983) Silvicultural and economic relationships of integrated forestry-farming with black walnut. Agroforestry Systems 1: 245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garrett HE, Jones JE, Kurtz WP and Slusher JP (1991) Black Walnut (Juglans Nigra L.) agroforestry—Its design and potential as a land-use alternative. Forestry Chronicle 67(3): 213–218Google Scholar
  9. Garrett HE and Neelan CM (1993). Yellow-bellied sapsuckers: a potential problem in walnut agroforestry. In: Proc Third North American Agroforestry Conference, August 15–18, 1993, Ames, IA, USA (Abstract)Google Scholar
  10. Gordon AM and Williams PA (1991a). Intercropping valuable hardwood tree species and cash crops in southern Ontario. In: Williams PA (ed) Proc First Conference on Agroforestry in North America, Guelph, Ontario Canada, August 13–16, 1991, pp 29–55Google Scholar
  11. Gordon AM and Williams PA (1991b) Intercropping valuable hardwood tree species and in North America. For Chron 67(3): 200–208Google Scholar
  12. Huxley PA (1985) The tree/crop interface — or simplifying the biological/environmental study of mixed cropping agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 3: 251–266Google Scholar
  13. Jones J and Haines J (1993) Select trees and fertilization significantly increase walnut nut production yields under alleycropping management. In: Program Third North American Agroforestry Conferences, August 15–18, 1993, Ames, IA, USA (Abstract)Google Scholar
  14. Kincaid WH, Kurtz WB and Garrett HE (1982) A silvicultural-economic model for black walnut. In: Black walnut for the future. USDA For Ser Gen Tech Rep NC-74, pp 122–129. No Cent For Exp Stn, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  15. Kurtz WB, Thurman SE and Monson MJ (1989) The use of agroforestry to control erosion —financial aspects. For Chron 67(3): 254–257Google Scholar
  16. McLean HDJ, King KM, Gordon AM and Gillespie TJ (1991) Width and orientation of corn rows affect growth of interplanted hardwood seedlings In: Williams PA (ed) Proc First Conference on Agroforestry in North America, Guelph, Ontario Canada, August 13–16, 1991, p 255Google Scholar
  17. Monteith JL, Ong CK and Corlett JE (1991) Microclimatic interactions in agroforestry systems. For Ecol & Man 45: 31–44Google Scholar
  18. Nambiar EKS and Sands R (1993) Competition for water and nutrients in forests. Can J For Res 23: 1955–1968Google Scholar
  19. Smith H (1986) The perception of light quality. In: Kendrick RE and Kronenberg GHM (eds) Photomorphogenesis in Plants, pp 187–216. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LancasterGoogle Scholar
  20. Squire GR (1990) The Physiology of Tropical Crop Production. CAB International. Wallingford, UK, 236 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Tollenaar M (1983) Potential vegetative productivity in Canada. Can J Plant Sci 63: 1–10Google Scholar
  22. Williams PA and Gordon AM (1992) The potential of intercropping as an alternative land use system in temperate North America. Agroforestry Systems 10: 253–263Google Scholar
  23. Wilson KR (1990) Apple Rootstocks. Ont Min of Ag and Food. Factsheet 90–118, 4 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. A. Williams
    • 1
  • A. M. Gordon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental BiologyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations