Skip to main content
Log in

Invited commentary

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Staritz M, Ewe K, Meyer zum Büschenfelde K-H (1985) Effect of the artificially elevated common bile duct pressure on the motor activity and function of the papilla of Vater. Digestion 31: 61–66

    Google Scholar 

  2. Staritz M, Poralla T, Dormeyer H-H, Meyer zum Büschenfelde K-H (1985) Endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones through the intact papilla following medical sphincter dilation. Gastroenterology 88: 1807–1811

    Google Scholar 

  3. Staritz M, Poralla T, Klose K, Manns M, Hommel G, Meyer zum Büschenfelde K-H (1986) Is the bile duct diameter a reliable parameter to diagnose extrahepatic cholestasis? Digestion 35: 120–124

    Google Scholar 

  4. Toouli J, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ, Dodds WJ, Arndorfer RC (1982) Sphincter of Oddi motor activity: a comparison between patients with common bile duct stones and controls. Gastroenterology 82: 111–117

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Staritz, M. Invited commentary. Surg Endosc 2, 63–64 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704352

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704352

Keywords

Navigation