Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical incompatibility between polymerizing HEMA and rubber balloons used for selective endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Permanent selective occlusion by detachable balloons with parent vessel preservation is considered to be the endovascular treatment of choice of intracranial aneurysms. It has been proposed that replacement of contrast material within the balloon with a polymerizing substance will eliminate balloon deflation. Despite this solution, our clinical experience with polyisoprene rubber balloons shows that deflation can still occur when the balloons are filled with poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). Experimental data are presented that demonstrate the chemical incompatibility between hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and polyisoprene rubber. The resulting degradation of the polyisoprene rubber accounts well for balloon failure. Thein vitro behaviour of silicone balloons and of a new HEMA sponge formulation to fill the balloons are compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. DEBRUN, P. LACOUR, J. P. CARON, M. HURTH, J. COMOY and Y. KERAVEL,J. Neurosurg. 49 (1978) 635.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. B. HIESHIMA, R. T. HIGASHIDA, V. V. HALBACH, L. CAHAN and K. GOTO,AJNR 7 (1986) 916.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. A. SERBINENKO,J. Neurosurg. 41 (1974) 125.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. GOTO, V. V. HALBACH, C. W. HARDIN, R. T. HIGASHIDA and G. B. HIESHIMA,Radiology 169 (1988) 787.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. TAKI, H. HANDA, S. YAMAGATA, M. ISHIKAWA, H. IWATA and Y. IKADA,Surgical Neurol. 13 (1980) 140.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. BARVIC, K. KLIMENT and M. ZAVADIC,J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1 (1967) 313.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. A. HALDON and B. E. LEE,Br. Polym. J. 4 (1972) 491.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. HORAK, F. SVEC and J. KALAL,Biomater. 7 (1986) 188.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. A. PEPPAS and H. J. MOYNIHAN, in “Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy”, edited by N. A. Peppas, (CRC, Boca Raton, 1987) pp. 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. J. MERLAND and D. RUFFENACHT, in “Neuroradiology”, edited by J. Valk (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 1985) pp. 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. B. HIESHIMA, V. S. GRINNEL and C. M. MEHRINGER,Radiology 138 (1981) 227.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. V. O'RELILLY, J. KLEEFIELD, M. D. FORREST, P. A. SVENDSEN and J. R. SERUR,AJNR 5 (1984) 625.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nonent, M., Laurent, A., Merland, J.J. et al. Chemical incompatibility between polymerizing HEMA and rubber balloons used for selective endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2, 89–93 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00703465

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00703465

Keywords

Navigation