Skip to main content
Log in

Bone reaction to the implant of intramedullary pins of three different metals in rat femur

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A bone-implant interface is influenced by several factors, such as chemical composition of the implanted material, stress transfer at the interface and the biology of the living model. Histological and vascular tree injection methods were used to assess the response to intramedullary pins, cast in different metallic alloys and implanted in the medullary canal of rat femora. A remarkable endosteal reaction, with an absence of major damage of the medullary vascular supply, was observed. Remodelling of this woven bone led to the formation of a lamellar bony shell around the pins, while in sham operations (pin inserted and soon removed) the former was completely resorbed in about 20 days. Mechanical trauma seems to be sufficient to evoke the response of the endosteum, which does not differ from that observed in the normal repair process of diaphyseal fractures. Bone grew very close to the metal surface, but a thin connective membrane or a layer of amorphous material was present at the interface with stainless steel, Co-Cr and titanium pins. Histology of the interface suggests that the implants were not mechanically neutral; these observations may be correlated to the thin layer of bone observed around hip cementless prosthetic stems in patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. KÜNTSCHER, “Practice of Intramedullary Nailing” (Springfield, Illinois, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. H. BRAGDON, L. FOSTER and N. C. JOSMAN,Amer. J. Pathol. 25 (1949) 709.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. S. BROOKES, “The blood supply of bone” (Butterworth, London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. GOTHMAN,Acta Chir. Scand. 120 (1960) 211.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. W. RHINELANDER, in “Biochemistry and Physiology of bone”, Vol. 2, edited by G. H. Bourne (Academic Press, New York, 1972) pp. 1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. F. RICHANY, H. SPRINZ, J. ASHBY and T. G. NEVRIL,J. Bone Joint Surg. 47A (1965) 1565.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. TRUETA and A. X. CAVDIAS, ibid.37B (1955) 492.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. FEITH,Acta Orthop. Scand. 161 (suppl.) (1975).

  9. J. LINDWER and A. VAN DER HOOF, ibid.46 (1975) 657.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. W. RHINELANDER, M. A. OXON, C. L. NELSON, R. D. STEWART and C. L. STEWART,Clin. Orthop. 141 (1979) 74.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. W. RHINELANDER, C. L. NELSON, R. D. STEWART and C. L. STEWART,The Hip 5 (1979) 127.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. A. RIETZ,Acta Chir. Scand. 388 (suppl. (1968) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. J. H. SLOFF,Acta Orthop. Scand. 42 (1971) 465.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. SUND and J. ROSENQUIST, ibid.54 (1983) 148.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. DANCKWARDT LILLIESTROM, ibid.128 (suppl. (1969) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. DANCKWARDT LILLIESTROM, G. L. LORENZI and S. OLERUD,J. Bone Joint Surg. 52A (1970) 1390.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. DRAENERT,The Hip 7 (1981) 71.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. HARMS, P. A. VAN DE BERG and C. NERTZ,Arch. Orthop. Unfall-Chir. 80 (1974) 71.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. DRAENERT and Y. DRAENERT,Leitz-Mitt. Wiss. Technol. 8 (1981) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. S. BROOKES,J. Anat. 94 (1960) 552.

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. H. SIM and P. J. KELLY,J. Bone Joint Surg. 52A (1970) 1377.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. ZUCHMAN, P. MAUVER, C. BERBESSON and J. BOUBOT,Rev. Chir. Orthop. 54 (1968) 221.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. J. SHABERG, A. R. LIBOFF and M. C. FALK,J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 19 (1985) 673.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. CHARNLEY, in “Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip. Theory and Practice”, Vol. 4 (Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 1979) pp. 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. D. BOBYN and C. A. ENGH,Orthopaedics 7 (1984) 1410.

    Google Scholar 

  26. C. A. ENGH, J. D. BOBYN and A. H. GLASSMAN,J. Bone Joint Surg. 69B (1987) 45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pazzaglia, U.E., Zatti, G., Cherubino, P. et al. Bone reaction to the implant of intramedullary pins of three different metals in rat femur. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2, 77–81 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00703462

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00703462

Keywords

Navigation