Skip to main content
Log in

Spiral angle of elementary cellulose fibrils in cell walls ofPicea abies determined by small-angle x-ray scattering

  • Originals
  • Published:
Wood Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The spiral angle of the elementary cellulose fibril in the wood cell wall, often called microfibril angle, is of primary importance for the mechanical properties of wood. While there are a number of methods to estimate this angle, x-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques have recently obtained a lot of attention because of their ability to provide information averaged over a significantly large specimen volume. Here, we present results from a related method, small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS). The advantage of SAXS is that, unlike XRD, it does not require any assumption on the orientation of the cellulose crystal axis with respect to the fibril axis. Full three-dimensional scattering patterns were collected using an area detector by rotating the sample around one axis. The distribution of fibrillar orientations was seen to reflect the typical cross-sectional shape of the tracheids (square or circular). In the stem, the spiral angle was found <5° in earlywood and ≈20° in latewood. In branches the angle was ≈30° in the upper part and ≈40° in the lower part, which strongly supports the idea that the spiral angle has primarily mechanical function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyd JD (1977) Interpretation of X-Ray Diffractogramms of Wood for Assessments of Microfibril Angles in Fibre Cell Walls. Wood Sci. Technol. 11: 93–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd JD (1973) Appraising Methods of Measuring Microfibril Angles. Wood Science 6(1): 95–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd JD, Foster RC (1974) Tracheid Anatomy Changes as Response to Changing Structural Requirements of the Tree. Wood Sci. Technology 8: 91–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave ID, Walker JCF (1994) Stiffness of wood in fast-grown plantation softwoods: the influence of microfibril angle. For. Prod. J. 44(5): 43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave ID (1997a) Theory of X-ray measurement of microfibril angle in wood, Part 1. The condition for reflection. Wood Sci. Technol. 31: 143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave ID (1997b) Theory of X-ray measurement of microfibril angle in wood, Part 2. The diffraction diagramm. Wood Sci. Technol. 31: 225–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Core HA, Côté WA, Day AC (1979) Wood Structure and Identification. Second Edition, Syracuse University Press

  • Côté WA, Day AC, Timell TE (1968) Distribution of Lignin in Normal and Compression Wood of Tamarack. Wood Sci. Technol. 2: 13–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins WJ (1972) Measurements of Mean Microfibril Angles of Wood Tracheids. Wood Sci.Technol. 6: 58

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Osta MLM (1973) A Direct X-Ray Technique for Measuring Microfibril Angle. Wood and Fiber 5(2): 118–129

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Osta MLM, Wellwood RW, Butters RG (1972) An Improved X-Ray Technique for Measuring Microfibril Angle of Coniferous Wood. Wood Science 5(2): 113–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Fengel D, Stoll M (1973) Über die Veränderungen des Zellquerschnittes, der Dicke der Zellwand und der Wandschichten von Fichtentracheiden innerhalb eines Jahrringes. Holzforschung 27: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Fengel D, Wegener G (1984) Wood Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions. De Gruyter, Berlin New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratzl P, Jakob HF, Rinnerthaler S, Roschger P, Klaushofer K (1997) Position-resolved small-angle scattering of complex biological materials. J. Appl. Cryst. 30: 765–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiller CH (1964) Correlation of Fibril Angle with Wall Thickness of Tracheids in Summerwood of Slash and Loblolly Pine. Tappi 47(2): 125–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakob HF, Fengel D, Tschegg SE, Fratzl P (1995) The Elementary Cellulose Fibril inPicea abies: Comparison of Transmission Electron Microscopy, Small-Angle X-ray, and Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering Results. Macromolecules 26: 8782–8787

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakob HF, Fratzl P, Tschegg SE (1994) Size and Arrangement of Elementary Cellulose Fibrils in Wood Cells: A Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering Study ofPicea abies. J. Structural Biology 113: 13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantola M, Kähkönen H (1963) Small-Angle X-Ray Investigation Of The Orientation Of Crystallites in Finnish Coniferous and Deciduous Wood Fibers. Ann. Acad. Scient. Fenn. A VI 137

  • Kantola M, Seitsonen S (1961) X-Ray Orientation Investigations on Finnish Conifers. Ann. Acad. Scient. Fenn. A VI 80

  • Kantola M, Seitsonen S (1969) On the relation between Tracheid Length and Microfibrillar Orientation measured by X-Ray Diffraction in Conifer Wood. Ann. Acad. Scient. Fenn. A VI 300

  • Lee PW, Eom YG (1988) Anatomical Comparison between Compression Wood and Opposite Wood in a Branch of Korean Pine. IAWA Bulletin 12: 187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Meylan BA (1972) The Influence of Microfibril Angle on the Longitudinal ShrinkageMoisture Content Relationship. Wood Sci. Technol. 6: 293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Meylan BA, Butterfield BG (1978) Helical Orientation of the Microfibrils in Tracheids, Fibres and Vessels. Wood Sci. Technol. 12: 219–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Paakkari T, Serimaa R (1984) A study of the structure of wood cells by x-ray diffraction. Wood Sci. Technol. 18: 79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston RD (1946) The fine structure of the wall of the conifer tracheid. Proc. Roy. Soc. B133, 327–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston RD (1934) Phil. Trans. B., 224, 131

    Google Scholar 

  • Prudhomme RE, Noah J (1975) Determination of Fibril Angle Distribution in Wood Fibers: A Comparison between the X-Ray Diffraction and the Polarized Microscope Method. Wood and Fiber 6(4): 282–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DG, Ehlers U, Herken R, Herrmann B, Mayer F, Schürmann F-W (1987) Methods of Preperation for Electron Microscopy. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg U, Salmén L, Oscarsson A (1997) The fibrillar orientation in the S2-layer of wood fibres as determined by x-ray diffraction analysis. Wood Sci. Technol. 31: 77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell J, Zimmermann T (1997) Das Feingefüge von Holz; Spektrum der Wissenschaft, April 1997, 86–89

  • Wardrop AB (1952) The Low-Angle Scattering of X-Rays. Textile Research Journal April 1952, 288–291

  • Wardrop AB (1954) The Fine Structure of the Conifer Tracheid. Holzforschung 1: 12–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop AB, Dadswell HE (1955) The development of the conifer tracheid, Holzforschung 2/3: 33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto H, Takasi, O, Yoshida M (1993) Method of Determining the Mean Microfibril Angle of Wood over a Wide Range by the Improved Cavés Method. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 39(4): 385–381

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Fratzl.

Additional information

We thank W. Laube, F. Einramhof, H. Königshofer and H. Löppert for their technical assistance. Financial support from the Fonds zu Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Proj. P10729-BIO) is gratefully acknowledged

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reiterer, A., Jakob, H.F., Stanzl-Tschegg, S.E. et al. Spiral angle of elementary cellulose fibrils in cell walls ofPicea abies determined by small-angle x-ray scattering. Wood Sci.Technol. 32, 335–345 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00702790

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00702790

Keywords

Navigation