Advertisement

Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 175–184 | Cite as

Functional properties of trichobothria in the bugPyrrhocoris apterus (L.)

  • Kazimir Drašlar
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    The trichobothria on the abdomen of the bugPyrrhocoris apterus differ in the length of their sensory hairs and in their functional properties. Three types may be distinguished. On segment four they have the following properties:

     
  2. 2.

    The sensory hair of type 1 is about 380 μm long. The receptor cell is spontaneously active. The spike frequency increases by deflection in caudal direction and decreases by deflection in the cranial direction. The adaptation is of the phasictonic type, and there is no significant change in sensitivity with prolonged stimulation. This receptor can follow sine stimuli synchronously up to about 160 Hz.

     
  3. 3.

    Type 2 (sensory hair about 180 μm) has no spontaneous activity. The spike frequency is increased by deflections in cranial and caudal direction. The response is of the phasic-tonic type and phase-locked to the sine wave up to 80 Hz.

     
  4. 4.

    The response of type 3 (sensory hair about 80 μm) is of the phasic type, and the adaptation is prompt. Like type 2 receptor is excited by deflections in either direction, and it follows sine waves synchronously up to 80 Hz.

     

The significance of these findings for the possible function of trichobothria as near field sound receptors is discussed.

Keywords

Sine Functional Property Receptor Cell Spontaneous Activity Sine Wave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennet-Clark, H. C.: Acoustics of insect song. Nature (Lond.)234, 255–259 (1971).Google Scholar
  2. Christian, U.: Zur Feinstruktur der Trichobothrien der WinkelspinneTegenaria derhami (Scop). Cytobiologie4, 172–185 (1971).Google Scholar
  3. Gogala, M.: Die akustische Kommunikation bei der WanzeTritomegas bicolor (L.). Z. vergl. Physiol.63, 379–391 (1969).Google Scholar
  4. Gogala, M.: Artspezifität der Lautäußerungen bei Erdwanzen. Z. vergl. Physiol.70, 20–28 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. Görner, P.: Mehrfach innervierte Mechanoreceptoren (Trichobothrien) bei Spinnen. Naturwissenschaften14, 437 (1965a).Google Scholar
  6. Görner, P.: A proposed transducing mechanism for a multiply-innervated mechanoreceptor (Trichobothrium) in spiders. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.30, 69–73 (1965b).Google Scholar
  7. Görner, P., Andrews, P.: Trichobothrien, ein Ferntastsinnesorgan bei Webespinnen. Z. vergl. Physiol.64, 301–317 (1969).Google Scholar
  8. Guthrie, D. M.: Sound production and reception in a cockroach. J. exp. Biol.45, 321–328 (1966).Google Scholar
  9. Haskell, P. T.: Hearing in certain Orthoptera. J. exp. Biol.33, 756–766 (1956).Google Scholar
  10. Hoffmann, C.: Die Trichobothrien der Skorpione. Naturwissenschaften14, 436 (1965).Google Scholar
  11. Hoffmann, C.: Bau und Funktion der Trichobothrien vonEuscorpius carpathicus L. Z. vergl. Physiol.54, 290–352 (1967).Google Scholar
  12. Nicklaus, R.: Die Erregung einzelner Fadenhaare vonPeriplaneta americana in Abhängigkeit von der Größe und Bichtung der Auslenkung. Z. vergl. Physiol.50, 331–362 (1965).Google Scholar
  13. Nicklaus, R.: Zur Bichtcharakteristik der Fadenhaare vonPeriplaneta americana. Z. vergl. Physiol.54, 434–437 (1967).Google Scholar
  14. Pumphrey, R. J., Rawdon-Smith, A. F.: Synchronized action potentials in the cereal nerve of the cockroach. J. Physiol. (Lond.)87, 4 (1936).Google Scholar
  15. Pumphrey, R. J.: Hearing in insects. Biol. Rev.15, 107–132 (1940).Google Scholar
  16. Roeder, K. R.: Nerve cells and insect behavior. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP 1963.Google Scholar
  17. Tarman, K.: Trihobotrialni organ akarin. SAZU Ljubljana, Razprave V 1959.Google Scholar
  18. Tarman, K.: Über Trichobothrien und Augen bei Oribatei. Zool. Anz.167, 51–58 (1961).Google Scholar
  19. Tullgren, A.: Zur Morphologie und Systematik der Hemipteren I. Entom. Tidskr. Arg.39, 115–133 (1918).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazimir Drašlar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of BiologyUniversity of LjubljanaJugoslavija
  2. 2.Zoological LaboratoryUniversity of CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations