Advertisement

Fitness standards for male college students

  • Edward L. Fox
  • Charles E. BillingsJr.
  • Robert L. Bartels
  • Robert Bason
  • Donald Mathews
Article

Abstract

The endurance fitness of 135 American male college students was evaluated by the maximal aerobic power test (bicycle ergometer), and the Harvard step test. Comparison of results with those previously reported indicated that our sample was representative of students in a number of countries. The following endurance fitness standards were therefore constructed: Aerobic power — less than 2.4 l/min or 34 ml/kg-min, poor; 2.4 to 2.9 l/min or 34 to 40 ml/kg-min, low average; 3.0 to 3.5 l/min or 41 to 48 ml/kg-min, average; 3.6 to 4.0 l/min or 49 to 55 ml/kg-min, good; greater than 4.0 l/min or 55 ml/kg-min, excellent: Harvard step test index — less than 54, poor; 64 to 67, low-average; 68 to 82, average; 83 to 96, good; greater than 96, excellent.

Key words

Maximal Aerobic Power Maximal Oxygen Consumption Harvard Step Test Endurance Fitness Standards 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astrand, I.: Aerobic work capacity in men and women with special reference to age. Acta physiol. scand.49 (suppl. 169), (1960).Google Scholar
  2. Astrand, P.-O., Saltin, B.: Maximal oxygen uptake and heart rate in various types of muscular activity. J. appl. Physiol.16, 977–981 (1961).Google Scholar
  3. Billings, C. E., Bason, B., Mathews, D. K., Fox, E. L.: Cost of submaximal and maximal work during chronic exposure at 3800 m. J. appl. Physiol.30, 406–408 (1971).Google Scholar
  4. Billings, C. E., Mathews, D. K., Bartels, B. L., Fox, E. L., Bason, R., Tanzi, D. E.: The effects of physical conditioning and partial acclimatization to hypoxia on work tolerance at high altitudes. Ohio State University, Research Foundation, Report No. RF 2002-4, Columbus, Ohio, June 1968.Google Scholar
  5. Binkhorst, R. A., Pool, J., van Leeuwen, P., Bouhuys, A.: Maximal oxygen uptake in healthy non-athletic males. Arbeitsphysiologie22, 10–18 (1966).Google Scholar
  6. Brouha, L., Fradd, N. W., Savage, B. M.: Studies in physical efficiency of college students. Res. Quart.15, 211–224 (1944).Google Scholar
  7. Brouha, L., Graybiel, A., Heath, C. W.: The step test: A simple method of measuring physical fitness for hard muscular work in adult men. Rev. canad. Biol.2, 86–92 (1943).Google Scholar
  8. Buskirk, E., Taylor, H. L.: Maximal oxygen intake and its relation to body composition, with special reference to chronic physical activity and obesity. J. Appl. Physiol.11, 72–78 (1957).Google Scholar
  9. Cook, E. B., Wherry, R. J.: A statistical evaluation of physical fitness tests. Res. Quart.21, 94–111 (1950).Google Scholar
  10. Davies, C. T. M.: Limitations to the prediction of maximal oxygen intake from cardiac frequency measurements. J. appl. Physiol.24, 700–706 (1968).Google Scholar
  11. Ekblom, B., Astrand, P.-O., Saltin, B., Stenberg, J., Wallstrom, B.: Effect of training on circulatory response to exercise. J. appl. Physiol.24, 518–528 (1968).Google Scholar
  12. Frick, M. H., Sjogren, A.-L., Perasalo, J., Pajunen, S.: Cardiovascular dimensions and moderate physical training in young men. J. appl. Physiol.29, 452–455 (1970).Google Scholar
  13. Glassford, R. B., Baycroft, G. H. Y., Sedgewick, A. W., MacNab, R. B. J.: Comparison of maximal oxygen uptake values determined by predicted and actual methods. J. appl. Physiol.20, 509–513 (1965).Google Scholar
  14. Harger, B.: The physiological responses of untrained college men to two frequencies of high volume interval training. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University 1971.Google Scholar
  15. Hermansen, L., Lange-Andersen, K.: Aerobic work capacity in young Norwegian men and women. J. appl. Physiol.20, 425–431 (1965).Google Scholar
  16. Hermansen, L., Saltin, B.: Oxygen uptake during maximal treadmill and bicycle exercise. J. appl. Physiol.26, 31–37 (1969).Google Scholar
  17. Ikai, M., Ishll, K., Miyamura, M., Kusano, K., Bar-or, O., Kollias, J., Buskirk, E.: Aerobic capacity of Ainu and other Japanese on Hokkaido. Med. Sci. Sports3, 6–11 (1971).Google Scholar
  18. MacNab, R. B. J., Conger, P. R., Taylor, P. S.: Differences in maximal and submaximal work capacity in men and women. J. appl. Physiol.27, 644–648 (1969).Google Scholar
  19. Mathews, D. K.: Measurement in physical education, 3rd ed., p. 56. Philadelphia: Saunders 1968.Google Scholar
  20. McArdle, W. D., Magel, J. R.: Physical work capacity and maximum oxygen uptake in treadmill and bicycle exercise. Med. Sci. Sports2, 118–123 (1970).Google Scholar
  21. Metheny, E. L., Brouha, L., Johnson, R. E., Forbes, W. H.: Some physiologic responses of women and men to moderate and strenuous exercise: A comparative study. Amer. J. Physiol.136, 318–326 (1942).Google Scholar
  22. Mitchell, J. H., Sproule, B. J., Chapman, C. B.: The physiological meaning of the maximal oxygen intake test. J. clin. Invest.37, 538–547 (1958).Google Scholar
  23. Robinson, S.: Experimental studies of physical fitness in relation to age. Arbeitsphysiologie10, 251–323 (1938).Google Scholar
  24. Roskamm, H., Landry, F., Samek, L., Schlager, M., Weidemann, H., Reindell, H.: Effects of a standardized ergometer training program at three different altitudes. J. appl. Physiol.27, 840–847 (1969).Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, C.: Some properties of maximal and submaximal exercise with, reference to physiological variation and the measurement of exercise tolerance. Amer. J. Physiol.142, 200–212 (1944).Google Scholar
  26. Wilmore, J. H.: Influence of motivation on physical work capacity and performance. J. appl. Physiol.24, 459–463 (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward L. Fox
    • 1
  • Charles E. BillingsJr.
    • 1
  • Robert L. Bartels
    • 1
  • Robert Bason
    • 1
  • Donald Mathews
    • 1
  1. 1.Exercise Physiology and Aviation Medicine Research LaboratoriesThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations