See, for example: R.S. Chu, T. Tamir: Guided-wave theory of light diffraction by acoustic microwaves. IEEE Trans. MTT-18, 486–504 (1970), or
Google Scholar
C. Elachi: Waves in active and passive periodic structures: A review. Proc. IEEE64, 666–1697 (1976)
Google Scholar
L. Solymar, D.J. Cooke:Volume Holograms and Volume Gratings (Academic, New York 1981)
Google Scholar
P.St.J. Russell: Phys. Rep.71, 209–312 (1981)
Google Scholar
The process of tracing-back is actually more complicated than suggested in this simple discussion, although the basic idea is correct. The wavevector of then-th coupled-wave inside the grating is taken to be\(\bar k_n = \bar k_0 + nK\) where\(\bar k_0\) is the refracted wavevector of the incident wave, andK the grating vector. For each value ofn, a distinct coupled-wave is seen as existing inside the grating, and as giving rise to a discrete diffracted wave (possibly evanescent) outside the grating. Hence, one visualizes an external diffracted wave as arising from the coupled wave whose phase velocity parallel to the interface equals that of the external wave; the external wave is “traced back” into that coupled wave
R.S. Chu, T. Tamir: Proc. IEE (London)119, 797–806 (1972)
Google Scholar
The excitation of single FB waves is possible in periodic planar waveguides using a prism coupler to launch a singlek
0 (or one of the higher order wavevectors of a FB wave) exactly in direction and magnitude. See: R. Ulrich, R. Zengerle: Optical Bloch waves in periodic planar waveguides, paper TuB1, Topical Meeting on Integrated and Guided-Wave Optics. Incline Village, Neveda (1980)
P.St.J. Russell, R. Ulrich: Elementary and coupled-waves in periodic planar waveguides. 2nd Europ. Conf. on Integrated Optics, Florence. IEE Conf. Publ.227, 88–91 (1983)
Google Scholar
R.S. Chu, J.A. Kong: IEEE Trans. MTT-25, 18–24 (1977)
Google Scholar
Z. Pinsker:Dynamical Scattering of X-Rays in Crystals, Springer Ser. Solid-State Sci.3 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1978)
Google Scholar
C.V. Raman, N.S.N. Nath: Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. Sect. A2, 406–420 (1935);3, 75–84 (1936)
Google Scholar
H. Kogelnik: Bell Syst. Tech. J.48, 2909–2947 (1969)
Google Scholar
R. Magnusson, T.K. Gaylord: J. Opt. Soc. Am.67, 1165–1170 (1977)
Google Scholar
M.G. Moharam, T.K. Gaylord: J. Opt. Soc. Am.71, 811–818 (1981)
Google Scholar
M.G. Moharam, T.K. Gaylord: J. Opt. Soc. Am.72, 187–190 (1982)
Google Scholar
Z. Zylberberg, E. Marom: J. Opt. Soc. Am.73, 392–398 (1983)
Google Scholar
P.St.J. Russell: Opt. Commun.48, 71–74 (1983)
Google Scholar
F. Bloch: Z. Physik52, 555–600 (1928)
Google Scholar
R.S. Chu, T. Tamir: Electr. Lett.7, 410–412 (1971)
Google Scholar
I.M. Mason, E.A. Ash: J. Appl. Phys.42, 5343–5351 (1970)
Google Scholar
P.St.J. Russell: Electr. Lett.20, 72–73 (1984)
Google Scholar
This component is in fact the spatial average of 〈S〉, and points parallel to thegroup velocity. As is shown by Brillouin [26, 18], the directions of energy flow and group velocity in periodic media are not always identical
P.St.J. Russell: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A1, 293–299 (1984)
Google Scholar
Notice that exactly the same travelling FB wave can be excited by a wide variety of different boundary conditions. The construction line in each case need only pass through a fixed intersection point (for example, either A or B in Fig. 5). Thus, exactly the same FB wave can be excited in a symmetrical reflection grating and in a symmetrical transmission grating if the construction line in each case cuts the curves in reciprocal space at the same point. This is a confirmation of the fact that the structure of the travelling FB waves dependsonly on the properties of the periodic medium itself, being independent of the boundary-geometry
M.G. Moharam, T.K. Gaylord: J. Opt. Soc. Am.73, 399–401 (1983)
Google Scholar
M. Born, E. Wolf:Principles of Optics (Pergamon, Oxford 1980) Sect. 7.6
Google Scholar
L. Brillouin:Wave Propagation and Group Velocity (Academic, New York 1960)
Google Scholar