Humangenetik

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 16–22 | Cite as

Probleme der Charakterisierung einzelner Chromosomen durch DNS-Messungen

  • B. Nitsch
  • J. D. Murken
Übersichtsartikel

Zusammenfassung

Es wird eine Übersicht über die verschiedenen Methoden zur DNS-Messung an Chromosomen gegeben. Die Methoden werden kurz beschrieben und die wichtigsten Ergebnisse der verschiedenen Autoren diskutiert.

Problems of characterizing individual chromosomes by measuring the DNA content

Summary

A review of the different methods of determining the DNA content of individual chromosomes is given. The methods are described briefly, and the results of the different authors are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bailly, S.: Étude cytophotométrique de la teneur en acides nucléiques des chromosomes métaphasiques de l'amphibien urodèle Pleurodeles Waltlii Michah. Exp. Cell. Res.48, 549–556 (1967).Google Scholar
  2. Bostrom, R. C., Holcomb, W. G.: A digital scanning cytophotometer. IEEE International Convention Record. Part9, 110–119 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. Carlson, L., Caspersson, T., Foley, G. E., Kudynowski, J., Lomakka, G., Simonsson, E., Sören, L.: The application of quantitative cytochemical techniques to the study of individual mammalian chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res.31, 589–594 (1963).Google Scholar
  4. Caspersson, T.: Über den chemischen Aufbau der Strukturen des Zellkernes. Skand. Arch. Physiol. Suppl. 8, 73, 1–151 (1936).Google Scholar
  5. — Cell growth and cell function. New York: W. W. Norten and Co. 1950.Google Scholar
  6. — Farber, S., Foley, G. E., Kudynowski, J., Modest, E. J., Simonsson, E., Wagh, U., Zech, L.: Chemical differentiation along metaphase chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res.49, 219–222 (1968).Google Scholar
  7. — Lomakka, G.: Microscale Spectroscopy. Biochem. Soc. Sympos.26, 25–40 (1966).Google Scholar
  8. Caspersson, T. Svensson, G.: A coordinated set of instruments for optical quantitative high resolution cytochemistry. Exp. Cell Res., Suppl.4, 9–24 (1957).Google Scholar
  9. Caspersson, T. Svensson, G. Säftström, R.: A versatile ultramicrospectrograph for multiple-line and surface scanning high resolution measurements employing automatized data analysis. Exp. Cell Res., Suppl.3, 40–51 (1955).Google Scholar
  10. Deeley, E. M.: An integrating microdensitometer for biological cells. J. sci. Instrum.32, 263–267 (1955).Google Scholar
  11. Duijn, P. van, Persijn, J. P.: A new technique for studying the quantitative aspects of cytochemical reactions and its application to the Feulgen reaction. Nature (Lond.)186, 805–806 (1960).Google Scholar
  12. Gaillard, L. J., van Duijn, P., Schaberg, A.: Photometric determination of DNA in human chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res.53, 417–431 (1968).Google Scholar
  13. Garcia, A. M.: Studies on DNA in leukocytes and related cells of mammals. VI. The Feulgen-DNA content of rabbit leukocyts after hypotonic treatment. J. Histochem. Cytochem.17, 47–55 (1968).Google Scholar
  14. Hsu, T. C., Zenzes, M. T.: Mammalian chromosomes in vitro. XVII. Idiogramm of the Chinese hamster. J. nat. Cancer Inst.32, 857–869 (1964).Google Scholar
  15. Keyl, H.-G.: Cytophotometrie an Riesenchromosomen. Zeiss-Informationen61, 96–99 (1966).Google Scholar
  16. Lampert, F.: Feinstruktur und Trockengewicht menschlicher Chromosomen. Quantitative Elektronenmikroskopie. Naturwissenschaften56, 629–633 (1969).Google Scholar
  17. Mendelsohn, M. L., Conway, T. J., Hungerford, D. A., Kolman, W. A., Perry, B. H., Prewitt, J. M. S.: Computer-oriented analysis of human chromosomes. I. Photometric estimation of DNA content. Cytogenetics5, 223–242 (1966).Google Scholar
  18. — Kolman, W. A., Perry, B., Prewitt, J. M. S.: Computer analysis of cell images. Postgard. Med.38, 567–573 (1965).Google Scholar
  19. Nitsch, B., Murken, J. D., Brück, H.-J.: Determining Feulgen-DNA of individual chromosomes by fluoreszence cytophotometry with incident light. Histochemie (in preparation).Google Scholar
  20. Pfeiffer, R. A.: Karyotyp und Phänotyp der autosomalen Chromosomenaberrationen beim Menschen. Stuttgart: Fischer 1968.Google Scholar
  21. Radley, J. M.: DNA content of individual chromosomes of Protemnodon bicolor. Exp. Cell Res.41, 217–220 (1965).Google Scholar
  22. Rudkin, G. T.: Cytochemistry in the ultraviolet. Microchem. J. Sympos. Ser.1, 261–276 (1961).Google Scholar
  23. —: Photometric measurements of individual metaphase chromosomes. In Vitro1, 12–20 (1965).Google Scholar
  24. — Hungerford, D. A., Nowell, P. C.: DNA content of chromosome Ph and chromosome 21 in human chronic granulocytic leukemia. Science144, 1229–1232 (1964).Google Scholar
  25. — Schultz, J.: Abstr. Genetics46, 893–894 (1961).Google Scholar
  26. Thaer, A. A.: Instrumentation for microfluorometry. In: Introduction to quantitative cytochemistry (G. Wied, ed.), p. 427–435. New York-London: Academic Press 1966.Google Scholar
  27. Tonkelaar, E. M. den, van Dujin, P.: Photographic colorimetry as a quantitative cytochemical method. I. Principles and practice of the method. Histochemie4, 1–9 (1964).Google Scholar
  28. Trapp, L.: Instrumentation for recording microspectrophotometry. In: Introduction to quantitative cytochemistry (G. Wied, ed.), p. 427–435. New York-London: Academic Press 1966.Google Scholar
  29. Ward, A.: Distribution of DNA along human chromosomes. Nature (Lond.)208, 486–487 (1965).Google Scholar
  30. Weber, K.: Leitz-Mikroskop-Photometer MPV mit variabler Meßblende. Leitz-Mitt. wiss. Tech.3, 103–107 (1965).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Nitsch
    • 1
  • J. D. Murken
    • 1
  1. 1.Kinderpoliklinik der Universität MünchenMünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations