Summary
-
1.
During mating behavior males and females of an Australian species ofRhagadotarsus (Gerridae) communicate with patterned sequences of surface waves (signals) produced by leg movements (Figs. 1, 3). Individuals produce signals while free on the surface or while grasping floating or fixed objects; these objects then become copulation and oviposition sites (Fig. 2). Wave patterns are produced during precopulation, copulation, postcopulation, and aggression (Fig. 3). In the laboratory, mating behavior occurs diurnally, nocturnally and in total darkness.
-
2.
Females were attracted and stimulated to oviposit by artificial precopulatory signals. Visual cues were shown not to be necessary for precopulatory behavior and oviposition to occur (Table 1).
-
3.
Female response to artificial calling signals of different frequencies corresponded to the frequency range (approximately 17–29 waves/sec) present in male calling signals; and females discriminated a difference in frequency of 1.5–2.0 waves/ sec (Table 2).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baerends, G. P.: Waarnemingen en proeven aan de ruggezwemmerNotonecta glauca. De levende natuur42, 11–17, 45–51 (1939).
Cheng, L., Fernando, C. H.: A taxonomic study of the Malayan Gerridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) with notes on their biology and distribution. Oriental Insects3, 97–160 (1969).
Hungerford, H. B., Matsuda, R.: Keys to subfamilies, tribes, genera and subgenera of the Gerridae of the world. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull.41, 3–24 (1960).
Markl, H., Wiese, K.: Die Empfindlichkeit des BückenschwimmersNotonecta glauca L. für Oberflächenwellen des Wassers. Z. vergl. Physiol.62, 413–420 (1969).
Matsuda, R.: Morphology, evolution and a classification of the Gerridae (Hemiptera—Heteroptera). Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull.41, 25–632 (1960).
Meyer, H. W.: Visuelle Schlüsselreize für die Auslösung der Beutefanghandlung beim BachwasserläuferVelia caprai (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Z. vergl. Physiol.72, 260–297 (1971).
Murphey, R. K.: Motor control of orientation of prey by the waterstrider,Gerris remiqis. Z. vergl. Physiol.72, 150–167 (1971).
Murphey, R. K.: Sensory aspects of the control of orientation to prey by the waterstrider,Gerris remiqis. Z. vergl. Physiol.72, 168–185 (1971).
Rabe, W.: Beiträge zum Orientierungsproblem der Wasserwanzen. Z. vergl. Physiol.35, 300–325 (1953).
Rensing, L.: Beiträge zur vergleichenden Morphologie, Physiologie und Ethologie der Wasserläufer. Zool. Beitr. Berlin (N.F.)7, 447–485 (1961).
Wiese, K.: Wahrnehmung von Oberflächenwellen geringer Amplitude durch den Wasserläufer. Naturwissenschaften56, 575 (1969).
Wolda, H.: Response decrement in the prey catching activity ofNotonecta glauca L. (Hemiptera). Arch, neerl. Zool.14, 61–89 (1961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This investigation was supported by an Australian-American Education Foundation grant and by funds from the Department of Zoology, The Australian National University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilcox, R.S. Communication by surface waves. J. Comp. Physiol. 80, 255–266 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694840
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694840