Abstract
The reform of K-12 math and science education will require a national, multisector, bipartisan effort sustained for at least two decades. The effort will involve all levels of government, communities, local businesses, and schools. The federal government has a pivotal role to play.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce (1990).America's Choice: High Skills or Low Wages National Center on Education and the Economy, Rochester, New York.
Committee on Education and Human Resources (1991).By the Year 2000: First in the World Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering, and Technology, Washington, D.C.
Corporate Task Force on Education (1989).Undereducated, Uncompetitive USA. Union Carbide Corporation, Danbury, Connecticul.
Carey, S. (1988).Why Jane and Johnny Aren't Learning Science Federation of Behavioral, Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Science and Public Policy Seminar, Washington, D.C.
Dossey, J. A., Mullis, I. V. S., Lindquist, M. M., and Chambers, D. L. (1988).The Mathematics Report Card: Are We Measuring Up? Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey.
Elmore, R. F., and Fuhrman, S. (1990). The national interest and the federal role in education.Publius: The Journal of Federalism 20(3):149–162.
Langreth, R. (1991). School science surveyed.Science 251:1024.
Merseth, K. How old is the shepherd? An essay about mathematics education.Phi Delta Kappan (in press).
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983).A Nation at Risk U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
National Science Board Commission on PreCollege Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (1983).Educating Americans for the 21st Century, National Science Foundation.
Office of Educational Research and Improvement (1990).The Condition of Education, 1990; Vol. I, Elementary and Secondary Education U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
Office of Educational Research and Improvement (1991).The Condition of Education, 1991; Vol. I, Elementary and Secondary Education U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
Office of Planning, Budget, and Evaluation (1991).The Eisenhower Mathematics and Science Education Program: An Enabling Resource for Reform U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
Quality Education for Minorities Project (1990).Education That Works: An Action Plan for the Education of Minorities, Cambridge, MA.
Rutherford, J. (1990). Reflections on the federal role in the reform of science education, background paper for the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government.
Task Force on K-12 Science and Math Education (1991).In the National Interest: The Federal Government in the Reform of K-12 Math and Science Education Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government, New York.
Task Force on Teaching as a Profession (1986).A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century, Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1988).Elementary and Secondary Education for Science and Engineering, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Education (1991).America 2000: An Education Strategy, Washington, D.C.
Walberg, H. (1991). Educational effectiveness: Psychological problems and possibilities. In Husen, T., and Keeves, J. (Eds.),Issues in Science Education: Science Competence in a Social and Ecological Context Pergamon Press, Elmsford, New York.