Advertisement

Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 335–348 | Cite as

Learning scientific reasoning with the interactive computer

  • Alfred Bork
Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper I report on a set of ten programs, the Scientific Reasoning Series. These programs take an area difficult to deal with in conventional science courses, the nature of scientific reasoning, and make it accessible to a much wider group of students. The aim of this material is to make improvements in scientific reasoning for all students over about 10 years old. The programs are highly interactive, adapting to the needs of the individual user. They are also motivationally strong, because of formative evaluation within public library environments. About 20 hours of student material is available. We argue that this material has important suggestions for the future of science education.

Key words

Computer science reasoning interactive individualization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Adams, F. (Ed.) (1985).Science and Computers in Primary Education: A Report of the Educational Research Workshop Held in Edinburgh, Scotland, Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arons, A. (1977).The Various Language; an Inquiry approach to the Physical Sciences, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Arons, A. (1984).Computer-based instructional dialogs in science courses. Science, 224, 4653.Google Scholar
  4. Block, J. H. (Ed.) (1974).Schools, Society, and Mastery Learning, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bork, A. (1980).Learning with Computers, Digital Press, Bedford.Google Scholar
  6. Bork, A. (1984). Instructional software: Principles and perspectives for design and use.Production Systems for Computer-Based Learning In Walker, D. and Hess, R. (Eds.), Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont.Google Scholar
  7. Bork, A. (1984). Creative computing.Computer Futures for Education. 10(11): 178–180.Google Scholar
  8. Bork, A. (1985).Personal Computers for Education, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Bork, A. (1991). Learning in the twenty-first century: Interactive multimedia technology, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Aided Learning, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  10. Bork, A., Ibrahim, B., Levrat, B., Milne, A., and Yoshii, R. (1992). The Irvine-Geneva course development system, Proceedings IFIP World Conference on Computers, Madrid.Google Scholar
  11. Chubin, D. (1990). Elementary and secondary education for science and engineering: A technical memorandum, Hemisphere Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, C., and Mangieri, (Eds.) (1992).Teaching Thinking: An Agenda for the 21st Century, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Pub.Google Scholar
  13. Committee on Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (1985).Mathematics, Science and Technology Education: A Research Agenda, National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Conference BIT, 3rd, University of Berlin, 1989. (1990).Computers in Science and Higher Education: Contributions to the Conference, Grabowski, J. (Ed.), Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Conference on Science, Society, and Education, 2nd, Leusden, Holland, 1982. (1983).Risk and Participation: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Science, Society and Education, Slaa, P., Turkenburg, W., and Williams, B. (Eds.), VU, Boekhandel/Uitgeverij, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, R. (1984).Learning Mathematics: The Cognitive Science Approach to Mathematics Education, Ablex Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
  17. DeBoer, G. (1991).A History of Ideas in Science Education, Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Duckworth, E.et al. (1990).Science Education: A Minds-On Approach for the Elementary Years, L. Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
  19. Duschl, R. (1990).Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and their Development, Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gardener, M.,et al. (1990).Toward a Scientific Practice of Science Education, L. Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
  21. Gega, P. (1990).Science in Elementary Education, 6th Ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Harding, J.Switched Off: The Science Education of Girls, Longman for Schools Council, York, U.K.Google Scholar
  23. Holdzkom, D., and Lutz, P. (Eds.) (1985). Research within reach: Science education: A research guided response to the concerns of educators. Research and development Interpretation Service, Appalachia Educational Laboratory, National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar
  24. Holton, G. (1973).Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought, Kepler to Einstein, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  25. International Symposium on World Trends in Science and Technology Education, 4th, 1987 (1987). Riquarts, K. (Ed.).Science and Technology Education and the Quality of Life, Keil, Germany.Google Scholar
  26. Kerr, S. Technology, teachers, and the search for school reform.ETRD, 37(4).Google Scholar
  27. Klein, M. S., and Rutherford, J. (Eds.) (1985).Science Education in Global Perspective: Lessons from Five Countries, Westview Press for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  28. Kurtz, R., and James, R. (Eds.). (1985).Science and Mathematics Education for the Year 2000 and Beyond, School Science and Mathematics Association.Google Scholar
  29. Layton, D. (1984).Interpreters of Science: A History of the Association for Science Education, J. Murray: The Association.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, R. (Ed.) (1989).Doing Science: Images of Science in Education, Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  31. Murnane, R., and Raizen, S. (Eds.) (1988).Improving Indicators of the Quality of Science and Mathematics Education in Grades K-12, National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  32. Musschenga, B., and Gosling, D. (Eds.) (1985).Science Education and Ethical Values: Introducing Ethics and Religion into the Science Classroom and Laboratory, Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  33. National Science Board, NSB Task Committee on Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education (1986–87).Undergraduate Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education, National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. Ogborn, J. (1985). Voices of science. An inaugural lecture delivered at University of London Institute of Education on Wednesday, 5 June 1985. Turnaround Distribution.Google Scholar
  35. Pearson, W., and Bechtel, K. (Eds.) (1989).Blacks, Science and American Education, Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rogers, J. (1970). The multiple-choice issue and CAI system constraints.NSPI Journal, 9(3).Google Scholar
  37. Sarton, G. (1936). The Study of the History of Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  38. Schoenfeld, A. (Ed.). (1987).Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
  39. Schroeder, E. (1986).Science Education, Oryx Press, Phoenix.Google Scholar
  40. Shavelson, R., Winkler, J., Stasz, C., Feibel, W., Robyn, A., and Shaha, S. (1984).Teaching Mathematics and Science; Patterns of Microcomputer Use, Rand.Google Scholar
  41. Sonnier, I. (1982).Holistic Education: Teaching of Science in the Effective Domain, Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  42. Stenhouse, D. (1985).Active Philosophy in Education and Science: Paradigms and Language Games, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  43. Wolman, R. (1985). What does interactivity really mean?Data Training, August:Google Scholar
  44. Woodward, J., Carnine, D., and Gersten, R. (1988). Teaching problem solving through computer simulations.American Educational Research Journal 25(1).Google Scholar
  45. Underwood, G., and Underwood, J. (1985). The computer in education: A force for change?Information Technology and People, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  46. Weinstock, H., and Bork, A. (1986).Designing Computer-based Learning Material, NATO ASI Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  47. Wellington, J. (Ed.) (1989). Skills and Processes in Science Education: A Critical Analysis, Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Yager, R. The constructivist learning model: A useful rationale as science education moves to STS approaches. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfred Bork
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational Technology Center, Information and Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvine

Personalised recommendations