Skip to main content
Log in

Management of common property resources: Limits to voluntary collective action

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper finds that the voluntary collective action may be an alternative to market and government in the management of common property resources. In developing countries, the people's capabilities to harness the preserved commons and the fairness in the appropriation of benefits from them are the limits on the voluntary collective action. It shows that collective action is possible if an outside agency plays the role of a catalyst in mitigating these limits. It also shows that there can be mutually beneficial sharing arrangements between government and village communities for the management of local forest resources. The standard result that common and state property resources turn into open access resources as population grows also holds good for the natural resources jointly managed by government and people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bromley, D. W. (1992),Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy, Blackwell, Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. and Devendra P. Chapagain (1984), ‘The Village Against the Centre: Resource Depletion in South Asia’,American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66, 868–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. and M. M. Cernea (1989), ‘The Management of Common Property Resources: Some Conceptual and Operational Fallacies’,57, World Bank Discussion Papers, The World Bank, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, K. G. K. Kadekodi and M. N. Murty (1990),Participatory Development: People and Common Property Resources, Studies in Economic Development and Planning, No. 52. Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. and R. C. Bishop (1975), ‘Common Property as a Concept in Natural Resource Policy’,Natural Resource Journal 15, 713–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R. and T. Sandler (1984), ‘Easy Riders, Joint Production, and Public Goods’,Economic Journal 94, 580–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R. and T. Sandler (1989),The Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropper, M. L. and W. E. Oates (1992), ‘Environmental Economics: A Survey’,Journal of Economic Literature 30, 675–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. S. and G. M. Heal (1979),Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harden, G. (1968), ‘The Tragedy of Commons’,Science 162, 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murty, M. N. (1987),Economic Evaluation of Composite Watershed Management in Dry Land Regions, ICRISAT, P.O. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965),The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A. (1983), ‘The Problem of Market Failure’,Natural Resources Journal 23(1), 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, N. C. (1993), ‘Social Forestry and Panchayats’,Seminar 406, June.

  • Wade, R. (1987a), ‘The Management of Common Property Resources: Finding a Cooperative Solution’,Research Observer 2(2), 219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1987b), ‘The Management Common Property Resources: Collective Action as an Alternative to Privatization or State Regulation’,Cambridge Journal of Economics 11, 107–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murty, M.N. Management of common property resources: Limits to voluntary collective action. Environ Resource Econ 4, 581–594 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693047

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693047

Key words

Navigation