Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 115–129 | Cite as

The U.S. allowance trading system for sulfur dioxide: An update on market experience

  • Renee Rico


In 1990, the U.S. Congress passed legislation that amended the Clean Air Act to create a new program to mitigate the effects of acid deposition in the U.S. through emission reductions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) at electric utility plants across the country. The SO2 reductions, totalling a 40% reduction nationally from 1980 levels or a 10 million ton reduction annually, are achieved largely through an emission trading system, the largest program of its kind designed to date. This trading system has the potential to save up to half of the compliance costs associated with more traditional source-by-source emission limit programs.

This paper briefly discusses background on the acid rain issue in the United States, and the principal features of the program, including: a permanent cap on utility emissions of SO2 beginning in 2010, decision to grant up-front allocation of emission credits to reduce individual approvals of trades, the use of continuous emission monitors and automatic penalties to ensure compliance, and integration of the Acid Rain program requirements with other Clean Air Act programs. The paper also discusses the development of the allowance trading market to date, including the types of compliance options chosen and quantity and type of emissions trading being conducted.

Key words

Emission trading United States sulfur dioxide air pollution costs cost-effectiveness 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. 101–549.Google Scholar
  2. Environmental Defense Fund v. Carol M. Browner (1994), Partial Settlement Agreement No. 93–1161.Google Scholar
  3. Fieldston Co.,Compliance Strategies Review (1992 to 1994, selected issues).Google Scholar
  4. Hahn, Robert W. and Roger G. Noll (1982), ‘Designing a Market for Tradable Emission Permits’, in Wesley A. Magat (ed.),Reform of Environmental Regulation 119–2146.Google Scholar
  5. Hahn, Robert W. and Carol A. May (1994), ‘How the Markets are Working’,The Electricity Journal, Robert O. Marritz, Seattle.Google Scholar
  6. Kete, Nancy (1992),The Politics of Markets: The Acid Rain Control Policy in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, Dissertation, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  7. Joeres, Erhard F., and Martin H. David, eds. (1983),Buying a Better Environment: Cost-Effective Regulation Through Permit Trading, The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  8. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (1989),The 1985 NAPAP Emissions Inventory (Version 2): Development of the Annual Data and Modelers Tapes, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  9. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (1990),1990 Integrated Assessment Report, The NAPAP Office of the Director, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. U.S. Department of Energy (1993),Examination of Utility Phase I Compliance Choices and State Reactions to Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, report by the Decision and Information Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1992),Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Final Acid Rain Implementation Regulations, Office of Atmospheric and Indoor Air Programs, Acid Rain Division.Google Scholar
  12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1994),Economic Analysis of the Title IV Requirements of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Office of Air and Radiation, Acid Rain Division.Google Scholar
  13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993 and 1994), Auction Data for Acid Rain Allowances.Google Scholar
  14. Tietenberg, T. H. (1985),Emission Trading, an Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renee Rico
    • 1
  1. 1.San AnselmoUSA

Personalised recommendations