Skip to main content
Log in

Position and velocity perturbations in the orbital frame in terms of classical element perturbations

  • Published:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transformation of classical orbit element perturbations to perturbations in position and velocity in the radial, transverse and normal directions of the orbital frame is developed. The formulation is given for the case of mean anomaly perturbations as well as for eccentric and true anomaly perturbations. Approximate formulas are also developed for the case of nearly circular orbits and compared with those found in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Broucke, R.: 1970, ‘On the Matrizant of the Two-Body Problem’,Astr. & Astrophys. 6, 173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, D.: 1959, ‘Solution of the Problem of Artificial Satellite Theory without Drag’,Astron. J. 64, 378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, D. and Clemence, G.M.: 1961,Methods of Celestical Mechanics, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulidis, D.C., Smith, D.E., Williamson, R.G. and Klosko, S.M.: 1988, ‘Observed Tidal Braking in the Earth/Moon/Sun System’,J. Geophys. Res. 93 (B6), 6216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelis, T.L.: 1987,Radial Orbit Error Reduction and Sea Surface Topography Determination Using Satellite Altimetry, Report No. 377, Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, W.S.: 1971,Astrodynamics, Vol. II, Van Nostrand Reinhold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaula, W.M.: 1966,Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell, Waltham, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaula, W.M.: 1983, ‘Inference of Variations in the Gravity Field from Satellite-to-Satellite Range-Rate’,J. Geophys. Res. 88 (B10), 8345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A.E.: 1982,Orbital Motion, Adam Hilger, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosborough, G. W.: 1986,Satellite Orbit Perturbations Due to the Geopotential, Report CSR-86-1, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosborough, G. W. and Tapley, B.D.: 1987, ‘Radial, Transverse and Normal Perturbations due to the Geopotential’,Celestial Mechanics 40, 409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sconzo, P.: 1963, ‘Explicit Expressions for the 36 Terms of the Jacobian Matrix Used in Orbit Computations’,Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana 34 (2).

  • Smart, W.M.: 1953,Celestial Mechanics, Longmans, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, T.E.: 1960,An Introduction to Celestial Mechanics, Wiley Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapley, B.D. and Rosborough, G.W.: 1985, ‘Geographically Correlated Orbit Errors and Its Effects on Satellite Altimetry’,J. Geophys. Res. 90 (C6), 11817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C.A.: 1987, ‘Geopotential Orbit Variations: Applications to Error Analysis’,J. Geophys. Res. 92 (B8), 8136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casotto, S. Position and velocity perturbations in the orbital frame in terms of classical element perturbations. Celestial Mech Dyn Astr 55, 209–221 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692510

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692510

Key words

Navigation