Skip to main content
Log in

Alarm substance cells in fathead minnows do not affect the feeding preference of rainbow trout

  • Brief Communications
  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

To test the hypothesis that minnow alarm substance cells contain a predator deterrent, rainbow trout were offered a choice between fathead minnows with alarm substance cells and fatheads which had been treated with androgen to eliminate alarm substance cells. The trout showed no preference. The testing procedure did detect a preference for liver over commercial pellets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Boorman, S.A. & P.R. Levitt. 1980. The genetics of altruism. Academic Press, New York. 459 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P.H. & P.J. Greenwood. 1978. Anti-predator defence strategies: some evolutionary problems. pp. 129–151.In J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies (ed.) Behavioural Ecology, Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubista, I. 1980. Minnesota bait farmer contributes to multimillion dollar state crop. Aquaculture Magazine 616: 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, W. 1974. Pheromones in fish and amphibia. pp. 269–296.In: M.C. Birch (ed.) Pheromones, Frontiers of Biology, Vol. 32, North-Holland Publ., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, W. 1982. Chemical signals in communication. pp. 306–326.In: T.J. Hara (ed.) Chemoreception in Fishes, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.B. & E.J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fish. Res. Board Can. Bull. 184. 966 pp.

  • Smith, R.J.F. 1973. Testosterone eliminates alarm substance in male fathead minnows. Can. J. Zool. 51: 875–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.J.F. 1974. Effects of 17α-methyltestosterone on the dorsal pad and tubercles of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Can. J. Zool. 52: 1031–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.J.F. 1982. The adaptive significance of the alarm substance-fright reaction system. pp. 327–342,In: T.J. Hara (ed.) Chemoreception in Fishes, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.J.F. & B.D. Murphy. 1974. Functional morphology of the dorsal pad in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas Rafinesque). Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 103: 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thines, G. & J.-M. Legrain. 1973. Effects of alarm substance on the behavior of the cave fish,Anoptichthys jordani andCaecobarbus geertsi. Ann. Speleol. 28: 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1964. Measurement of consociation among fishes and comments on the evolution of schooling. Publ. Mus. Mich. State Univ. Biol. Ser. 2: 349–384

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernstein, J.W., Smith, R.J.F. Alarm substance cells in fathead minnows do not affect the feeding preference of rainbow trout. Environ Biol Fish 9, 307–311 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692380

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692380

Keywords

Navigation