Abstract
The papers on economic growth with environmental constraints usually ignore the effect of technical progress, this results in static steady state solutions. This paper examines the problem of optimal economic growth with environmental damage, technical progress taken into account, which produces a steady state solution that corresponds to an equilibrium growth, with non-constant emissions and pollutant stock. As a means of steering the economy along the optimal path, two types of tradeable pollution permits are analyzed. The method of stabilizing the optimal path, leading to a steady state, is suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, A. L. (1982), ‘Intergenerational Equity: The Capital-Environment Trade-Off’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 9, 165–185.
Bovenberg, A. L. and S. Smulders (1993), ‘Environmental Quality and Pollution-saving Technological Change in a Two-sector Endogenous Growth Model’, Discussion Paper Series, No. 9321, CentER, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
Gottinger, H. W. (1992), ‘Economic Models of Optimal Energy Use under Global Environmental Constraints’, in R. Pethig (ed.),Conflicts and Cooperation in Managing Environmental Resources, Springer-Verlag.
Krelle, W. (1985),Theorie des Wirtschaftlichen Wachstums, Springer-Verlag.
Manne, A. and R. Richels (1990), ‘CO2 Emission Limits: An Economic Cost analysis for the USA’,The Energy Journal 11, 52–74.
Nordhaus, W. D. (1993), ‘Rolling the ‘DICE’: An Optimal Transition Path for Controlling Greenhouse Gases’,Resource and Energy Economics 15, 27–50.
Ploeg, F. van der and C. Withagen (1991), ‘Pollution Control and the Ramsey Problem’,Environmental and Resource Economics 1, 215–236.
Tahvonen, O. and J. Kuuluvainen (1993), ‘Economic Growth, Pollution, and Renewable Resources’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24, 101–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eismont, O. Economic growth with environmental damage and technical progress. Environ Resource Econ 4, 241–249 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692326
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692326