Abstract
This paper explores the analytical and empirical properties of a new method for emission trading according to a fixed exchange rate. The exchange rate is based on the ratios of the marginal costs of abatement in the optimal solution in order to account for the impact of the location of emission sources on the deposition. It is shown that, generally, this system will not achieve the optimal solution and does not guarantee that environmental deposition constraints are not violated, although total abatement costs are always reduced. A routine was developed to mimic trading as a bilateral, sequential process, subject to an exchange rate. In the example used, results for SO2 emissions in Europe show that, starting from a uniform reduction, exchange-rate trading achieves higher cost savings than one-to-one trading, without achieving the cost minimum. Sulfur deposition targets are not violated since the initial emission allocation overfulfilled targets at many places. The results are sensitive to: pre-trade emission levels, the transaction costs, the availability of information on potential cost savings and assumptions made on the behavior of trading partners.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcamo, J., L. Hordijk and R. Shaw, eds. (1990),The RAINS Model of Acidification, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London.
Amann, M. (1992),Zur Effizienten Multinationalen Allokation von Emissionsminderungsmassnahmen zur Verringerung der Sauren Deposition — Anwendungsbeispiel Österreich, Dissertation, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Amann, M., I. Bertok, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen and W. Schöpp (1992),Strategies for Reducing Sulfur Dioxide Emissions in Europe, SR-92-8, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
Amann, M. and G. Kornai (1987),Cost Functions for Controlling SO 2 Emissions in Europe, WP 87-065, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Laxenburg, Austria.
Atkinson, S. and T. H. Tietenberg (1991), ‘Market Failure in Incentive Based Regulation: The Case of Emissions Trading’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21, 17–31.
Batterman, S. A. and M. Amann (1991), ‘Targeted Acid Rain Strategies Including Uncertainty’,Journal of Environmental Management 32, 57–72.
Baumol, W. and W. Oates (1988),The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bergman, L., H. Cesar and G. Klaassen (1992), ‘Efficiency in Transboundary Pollution Abatement’, in J. J. Krabbe and W. J. M. Heyman, eds.,National Income and Nature: Externalities, Growth and Steady State, pp. 125–142, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London.
Borowski, A. R. and H. E. Ellis (1987), ‘Summary of the Final Federal Emissions Trading Policy Statement’,Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 37(7), 798–800.
Derwent, R. G. (1990),Optimal Strategies for Sulfur Emission Control in Europe, Harwell Laboratory, Oxfordshire.
Dwyer J. (1991),California's Tradeable Emissions Policy and its Application to the Control of Greenhouse Gases, Paper presented at the OECD workshop “Tradeable Permits for Reducing Greenhouse Gases”, June 26–27, 1991, OECD, Paris.
Førsund, F. R. (1992a),BAT and BATNEEC: An Analytical Interpretation, Memorandum no. 28, December, Department of Economics, University of Oslo.
Førsund, F. R. (1992b),Emission Trading, Paper presented at the UN/ECE Task Force on Economic Aspects of Abatement Strategies, Bilthoven, June 1–2, 1992.
Hahn, R. W. and G. Hester (1989), ‘Where Did All the Markets Go? An Analysis of EPA's Emissions Trading Program’,Yale Journal on Regulation 6(1), 109–153.
Hahn, R. W. (1989), ‘Economic Prescriptions for Environmental Problems: How the Patient Followed the Doctor's Orders’,Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(2), 95–114.
Iversen, T., N. E. Halvorsen, S. Mylona and H. Sandnes (1991),Calculated Budgets for Airborne Acidifying Components in Europe, 1985, 1987, 1988, 1989 and 1990, The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo.
Kete, N. (1992), ‘The Acid Rain Control Allowance Trading System’, in T. Jones and J. Corfee-Morlot, eds.,Climate Change, Designing a Tradeable Permit System, pp. 78–108, OECD, Paris.
Klaassen, G. and H. Jansen (1989),Economic Principles for Allocating the Costs of Reducing Sulfur Emissions in Europe. EB.AIR/Ge.2/R.26 (Economic Commission for Europe), United Nations, Geneva.
Kremeniouk, R., ed. (1991),International Negotiation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Kruitwagen, S. (1992),Tradeable Permits for SO 2 Emissions in Europe: A Pollution Offset Experiment, Wageningen Economic Papers (Faculty of Economics), Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen.
Krupnick, A. J., W. E. Oates and E. van de Verg (1983), ‘On Marketable Air Pollution Permits: The Case for a System of Pollution Offsets’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 10, 233–247.
McGartland, A. M. and W. E. Oates (1985), ‘Marketable Permits for the Prevention of Environmental Deterioration’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 12, 207–228.
Montgomery, W. D. (1972), ‘Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs’,Journal of Economic Theory 5, 395–418.
Opschoor, J. B. and H. B. Vos (1989),Economic Instruments for Environmental Protection, OECD, Paris.
Tietenberg, T. H. (1985),Emission Trading: An Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
Tietenberg, T. H. (1990), ‘Economic Instruments for Environmental Protection’,Oxford Review of Economic Policy 6(1), 17–33.
UNECE (1992),Economic Aspects of Abatement Strategies. Progress Report by the Chairman of the Task Force, EB.AIR/WG5/R.36, United Nations, Geneva.
UNECE (1993),Integrated Assessment Modelling. Progress Report by the Chairman of the Task Force, EB.AIR/WG.5/R.38, United Nations, Geneva.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klaassen, G.A.J., Førsund, F.R. & Amann, M. Emission trading in Europe with an exchange rate. Environ Resource Econ 4, 305–330 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692228
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692228