Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 23–40 | Cite as

Modeling as a tool to manage ecosystems under multiple stresses: an application to Lake Ontario

  • Rajeev Jain
  • Joseph V. DePinto
Article

Abstract

Present-day ecosystem management involves understanding of the synergistic effect of multiple stressors on multiple and frequently nebulous management end-points. An example is the simultaneous management of nutrient load reductions and salmon stocking in Lake Ontario. In this study, a simple whole-lake annual time scale model was developed to assess the relationship between these two stressors and various ecosystem responses. The model was used to explore the utility of some possible management end-points for ecosystem health. In historical simulations, production per stocked fish and salmon survival appeared to be good indicators, while nutrient recycling rate and average ecosystem-wide food limitation were found to be fairly unresponsive to the two stressors. The model was further used to predict long term averages of salmon biomass and selected health indicators at various sustained loading and stocking rates. Salmon biomass increased with stocking rate at all stocking rates examined, but the rate of increase declined somewhat at high stocking rates. The response of salmon biomass to nutrient loading appeared to be approximately sigmoidal i.e. there was a nutrient threshold below which fish biomass could not be sustained and another nutrient threshold above which salmon biomass either remained constant or even decreased. The response to either stressor was found to be modified by the value of the other stressor, illustrating the importance of ecosystem-level models for aquatic ecosystem management.

Keywords

ecosystem modeling fishery management organic carbon mass balance stocking phosphorus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baird, D. & R. E. Ulanowicz, 1993. Comparative study on the trophic structure, cycling and ecosystem properties of four tidal estuaries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 99 (3): 221–237.Google Scholar
  2. Bierman, V. J., Jr., & D. M. Dolan, 1986. Modeling of phytoplankton in Saginaw bay: II. Post-audit phase. J. Environ. Eng., Amer. Soc. Civil Eng. 112(2): 415–429.Google Scholar
  3. Cairns, J. Jr, P. V. McCormick & B. R. Niederlehner, 1993. A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia 263(1): 1–44.Google Scholar
  4. Cairns, Jr. J. & J. R. Pratt, 1992. Restoring ecosystem health and integrity during a human population increase to ten billion. J. Aquatic Ecosystem Health 1(1):59–68.Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter, S. R., Johnson, B. M., Luecke, C., Madenjian, C. R., Post, J. R., Rudstam, L. G., Vanni, M. J., He, X., Allen, Y., Dodds, R., McTigue, K. & D. Schael, 1992. Modeling the Lake Mendota ecosystem: synthesis and evaluation of progress. In: J. F. Kitchell (ed),Food Web Management: A Case Study of Lake Mendota. pp. 451–459. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Chapra, S. C. & K. H. Reckhow, 1983.Engineering Approaches for Lake Management. Volume 2: Mechanistic Modeling. Butterworth Publishers, Stoneham, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Charlton, M. N. & D. R. S. Lean, 1987. Sedimentation resuspension and oxygen depletion in Lake Erie. J. Great Lakes Res. 13(4): 709–723.Google Scholar
  8. Christie, W. J., M. Becker, J. W. Cowden & J. R. Vallentyne, 1986. Managing the Great Lakes basin as a home. J. Great Lakes Res. 12: 2–17.Google Scholar
  9. Costanza, R., Norton, B. G. & B. D. Haskell (eds), 1992.Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Island Press, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  10. DeAngelis, D. L., 1992.Dyanmics of Nutrient Cycling and Food Webs. Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Di Toro, D. M. & J. P. Connolly, 1980. Mathematical models of water quality in large lakes II. Lake Erie. Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota. EPA-600/3-80-065.Google Scholar
  12. Dobson, H. F. H., 1994. Lake Ontario water quality trends, 1969–1992: Some observational nutrient-science for protecting a major and vulnerable source of drinking water. National Water Research Institute, Burlington, Canada. NWRI Contribution No. 94-58.Google Scholar
  13. Downing, J. A. & C. Plante, 1993. Production of fish populations in lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 110–120.Google Scholar
  14. Flint, R. W. & R. J. J. Stevens, 1989. Lake Ontario: a Great Lake in transition. Great Lakes Program Publ. Monograph #2. SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo NY.Google Scholar
  15. Fontaine, T. & D. Stewart, 1992. Exploring the effects of multiple management objectives and exotic species on Great Lakes foodwebs and contaminant dynamics. Environmental Management 16(2): 225–229.Google Scholar
  16. Gray, I. M., 1987. Differences between nearshore and offshore phytoplankton communities in Lake Ontario. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44: 2155–2163.Google Scholar
  17. Hartig, J. H., J. F. Kitchell, D. Scavia & S. B. Brandt, 1987. Rehabilitation of Lake Ontario: the role of the nutrient reduction and foodweb dynamics. International Joint Commission (IJC). Windsor, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  18. Hewett, S. W., 1989. Ecological applications of bioenergetics models. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 6: 113–120.Google Scholar
  19. Hydroscience, 1976. Assessment of the effects of nutrient loadings on Lake Ontario using a mathematical model of the phytoplankton. Report to the Great Lakes Water Quality Board, IJC, Windsor, Ontario, 116 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Jain, R. & J. V. DePinto, 1991. Lake Ontario nutrient cycle/Foodweb modeling. Proceedings of a workshop hosted by Great Lakes Program, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
  21. Johannsson, O. E. & R. O'Gorman, 1991. Roles of predation, food and temperature in structuring the epilimnetic zooplankton populations in Lake Ontario, 1981–1986. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 120: 193–208.Google Scholar
  22. Johannsson, O. E., E. L. Mills & R. O'Gorman, 1991. Changes in the nearshore and offshore zooplankton communities in Lake Ontario: 1981–88. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48: 1546–1557.Google Scholar
  23. Johannsson, O. E., 1987. Comparison of Lake Ontario zooplankton communities between 1967 and 1985: before and after implementation of salmonid stocking and phosphorus control. J. Great Lakes Res. 13(3): 328–339.Google Scholar
  24. Jones, M. L., J. F. Koonce & R. O'Gorman, 1993. Sustainability of hatchery-dependent salmonie fisheries in Lake Ontario: The conflict between predator demand and prey supply. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 122(5): 1002–1018.Google Scholar
  25. Kay, J. J., L. A. Graham & R. E. Ulanowicz, 1989. A detailed guide to network analysis. In: F. Wulff, J. G. Field & K. H. Mann (eds),Network Analysis in Marine Ecology. Methods and Applications. pp. 15–61. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Kitchell, J. F., D. J. Stewart & D. Weininger, 1977. Applications of a bioenergetics model to yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34: 1922–1935.Google Scholar
  27. Lean, D. R. S., H.-J. Fricker, M. N. Charlton, R. L. Cuhel, & F. R. Pick, 1987. The Lake Ontario life support system. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44: 2230–2240.Google Scholar
  28. Loehr, R. C., C. S. Martin, & W. Rast, 1980. Phosphorus management strategies for lakes. Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., Ann Arbor, MI 48106.Google Scholar
  29. Matson, P A. & A. A. Berryman (eds), 1992. Ratio-dependent predator-prey theory. Ecology 73: 1529–1566.Google Scholar
  30. McQueen, D. J. & J. R. Post, 1988. Cascading trophic interactions: uncoupling at the zooplankton-phytoplankton link. Hydrobiologia 159: 277–296.Google Scholar
  31. McQueen, D. J., J. R. Post & E. L. Mills, 1986. Trophic Relationships in freshwater pelagic ecosystems. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 1571–1581.Google Scholar
  32. Minns, C. K. 1992. Use of models for integrated assessment of ecosystem health. J. Aquatic Ecosystem Health 1(2): 109–118.Google Scholar
  33. Minns, C. K., V. W. Cairns, R. G. Randall & J. E. Moore. 1994. An index of biotic integrity (IBI) for fish assemblages in the littoral zone of Great Lakes' areas of concern. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51 (8): 1804–1822.Google Scholar
  34. Mitsch, W. J., 1993. Ecological engineering: a cooperative role with the planetary life-support system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27(3): 438–444.Google Scholar
  35. O'Gorman, R. & C. P. Schneider, 1986. Dynamics of alewives in Lake Ontario following a mass mortality. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 115(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  36. Orsatti, S. D. and G. C. LeTendre, 1994. Lake Ontario stocking and marking program 1993. GLFC (Great Lakes Fishery Commission), Lake Ontario Committee meeting, Niagara Falls, Ontario, March 29–30,1994.Google Scholar
  37. Plante, C. & J. A. Downing, 1993. Relationship of salmonine production to lake trophic status and temperature. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 1324–1328.Google Scholar
  38. Rand, P. S., D. J. Stewart, P. W. Seelbach, M. L. Jones & L. R. Wedge, 1993. Modeling steelhead population energetics in Lakes Michigan and Ontario. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 122 (5): 977–1001.Google Scholar
  39. Rand, P S., D. J. Stewart, B. F Lantry, L. G. Rudstam, O. E. Johannsson, A. P. Goyke, S. B. Grandt, R. O'Gorman & G. W. Eck. Effect of whole-lake plantivory by the pelagic prey fish community in Lakes Michigan and Ontario. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. In press.Google Scholar
  40. Rapport, D. J., 1989. What constitutes ecosystem health? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 33, 1: 120–132.Google Scholar
  41. Reynolds, C. S., 1984.The Ecology of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  42. Scavia, D., G. L. Fahnenstiel, M. S. Evans, D. J. Jude & J. T. Lehman, 1986. Influence of salmonine predation and weather on long-term water quality in Lake Michigan. Can. J. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 43: 435–443.Google Scholar
  43. Sherman, K., 1994. Sustainability, biomass yields, and health of coastal ecosytsems: an ecological perspective. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 112 (3): 277–301.Google Scholar
  44. Steedman, R. J., 1994. Ecosystem health as a management goal. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13(4): 605–610.Google Scholar
  45. Stevens, R. J. J., 1988. A Review of Lake Ontario Water Quality with Emphasis on the 1981–1982 Intensive Years. A Report to the Surveillance Subcommittee of the Great Lakes Water Quality Board. International Joint Commission, Great Lakes Regional Office, Windsor.Google Scholar
  46. Stevens, R. J. J. & M. A. Neilson, 1987. Response of Lake Ontario to reductions in phosphorus load, 1967–82. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44: 2059–2068.Google Scholar
  47. Stewart, D. J., J. F. Kitchell & L. B. Crowder, 1981. Forage fishes and their salmonid predators in Lake Michigan. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110: 751–763.Google Scholar
  48. Suter, G. W. II, 1993. A critique of ecosystem health concepts and indexes. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 12(9): 1533–1539.Google Scholar
  49. Thomann, R. V., R. P. Winfield & J. J. Segna, 1979. Verification analysis of Lake Ontario and Rochester Embayment three dimensional eutrophication models. US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota. EPA-600/3-79-094.Google Scholar
  50. Thomann, R. V. & J. A. Mueller, 1987. Principles of surface water quality modeling and control. Harper & Row, NY.Google Scholar
  51. Tilzer, M. M. & P. Bossard, 1992. Large lakes and their sustainable development. Aquatic Sciences. 54(2): 91–103.Google Scholar
  52. Ulanowicz, R. E., 1989. A generic simulation model for treating incomplete sets of data. In: F Wulff, J. G. Field, & K. H. Mann (eds),Network Analysis in Marine Ecology. Methods and Applications. pp. 84–89. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  53. Vallentyne, J. R. & M. Munawar, 1993. From aquatic science to ecosystem health: a philosophical perspective. J. Aquatic Ecosystem Health 2(4): 231–236.Google Scholar
  54. Vollenweider, R. A., W. Rast & J. Kerekes, 1980. The phosphorus loading concept and Great Lakes eutrophication. In: R. C. Loehr, C. S. Martin & W. Rast (eds),Phosphorus Management Strategies for Lakes. Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., Ann Arbor, MI 48106.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajeev Jain
    • 1
  • Joseph V. DePinto
    • 1
  1. 1.Great Lakes ProgramBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations