Advertisement

Acta Neuropathologica

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 139–149 | Cite as

Involvement of the perineurium in experimental allergic neuritis: Electron microscopic observations

Original Investigations

Summary

Electron microscopic observations on the perineurium in EAN are described. Extravasated serum protein was observed in the endoneurial space and also between the cellular laminae of the perineurium. A mechanism of macropinocytotic transport of protein across the perineurium is proposed. The observations are related to the known properties of the perineurium as a diffusion barrier and are interpreted as a mechanism by the perineurium to restore the composition of the endoneurial fluid.

Key words

Perineurium Experimental Allergic Neuritis Extravasated Protein Electron Microscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allt, G.: The genesis of experimental allergic neuritis and encephalomyelitis: a critical evaluation. (In preparation).Google Scholar
  2. —, Evans, E. M., Evans, D. H. L.: The vulnerability of immature rabbits to experimental allergic neuritis: a light and electron microscope study. Brain Res.29, 271–291 (1971).Google Scholar
  3. Åström, K. E., Webster, H. de F., Arnason, B. G.: The initial lesion of experimental allergic neuritis. A phase and electron microscopic study. J. exp. Med.128, 469–495 (1968).Google Scholar
  4. Ballin, R. H. M., Thomas, P. K.: Electron microscope observations on demyelination and remyelination in experimental allergic neuritis. Part. I Demyelination. J. neurol. Sci.8, 1–18 (1968).Google Scholar
  5. ——: Electron microscope observations on demyelination and remyelination in experimental allergic neuritis. Part 2. Remyelination. J. neurol. Sci.8, 225–237 (1969).Google Scholar
  6. Böck, P., Hanak, H.: Die Verteilung exogener Peroxydase im Endoneuralraum. Histochemie25, 361–371 (1971).Google Scholar
  7. Causey, G., Palmer, E.: The epineural sheath of a nerve as a barrier to the diffusion of phosphate ions. J. Anat. (Lond.)87, 30–36 (1953).Google Scholar
  8. Cutler, R. W. P., Lorenzo, A. V., Barlow, C. F.: Brain vascular permeability to I125 gamma globulin and leukocytes in allergic encephalomyelitis. J. Neuropath. exp. Neurol.26, 558–571 (1967).Google Scholar
  9. Denny-Brown, P.: Importance of neural fibroblasts in the regeneration of nerve. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. (Chic.)55, 171–215 (1946).Google Scholar
  10. Feng, T. P., Liu, Y. M.: The connective tissue sheath of the nerve as effective diffusion barrier. J. cell. comp. Physiol.34, 1–16 (1949).Google Scholar
  11. Gamble, H. J., Eames, R. A.: An electron microscope study of the connective tissue of human peripheral nerve. J. Anat. (Lond.)98, 655–663 (1964).Google Scholar
  12. Hall, J. I.: Studies on demyelinated peripheral nerves in guinea-pig with experimental allergic neuritis. A histological and electrophysiological study. Part I. Symptomatology and histological observations. Brain90, 297–312 (1967).Google Scholar
  13. Hirano, A., Dembitzer, H. M., Becker, N. H., Levine, S.: Fine structural alterations of the blood-brain barrier in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. J. Neuropath. exp. Neurol.29, 432–440 (1970).Google Scholar
  14. Huxley, A. F., Stämpfli, R.: Effect of potassium and sodium on resting and action potentials of single myelinated nerve fibres. J. Physiol. (Lond.)112, 496–508 (1951).Google Scholar
  15. Klemm, H.: Das Perineurium als Diffusionsbarriere gegenüber Peroxydase bei epi- und endoneuraler Applikation. Z. Zellforsch.108, 431–445 (1970).Google Scholar
  16. Kurucz, J., Osgyáni, J.: Contributions to the pathomorphology of pulmonary innervation. Acta morph. Acad. Sci. hung.4, 227–232 (1954).Google Scholar
  17. Kristensson, K.: Transport of fluorescent protein tracer in peripheral nerve. Acta neuropath. (Berl.)16, 293–300 (1970).Google Scholar
  18. —, Olsson, Y.: The perineurium as a diffusion barrier to protein tracers. Differences between mature and immature animals. Acta neuropath. (Berl.)17, 127–138 (1971).Google Scholar
  19. Lampert, P. W.: Mechanism of demyelination in experimental allergic neuritis. Electron microscope studies. Lab. Invest.20, 127–138 (1969).Google Scholar
  20. —, Carpenter, S.: Electron microscopic studies on the vascular permeability and the mechanism of demyelination in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. J. Neuropath. exp. Neurol.24, 11–24 (1965).Google Scholar
  21. Levine, S., Hirano, A., Zimmerman, H. M.: Hyperacute allergic encephalomyelitis. Electron microscopic observations. Amer. J. Path.47, 209–221 (1965).Google Scholar
  22. Lieberman, A. R.: The connective tissue elements of the mammalian nodose ganglion. An electron microscope study. Z. Zellforsch.89, 95–111 (1968).Google Scholar
  23. Lorente de Nó, R.: The ineffectiveness of the connective tissue sheath of nerve as a diffusion barrier. J. cell. comp. Physiol.35, 195–240 (1950).Google Scholar
  24. Mellick, R., Cavanagh, J. B.: Longitudinal movement of radioiodinated albumin within extravascular spaces of peripheral nerves following three systems of experimental trauma. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat.30, 458–463 (1967).Google Scholar
  25. Olsson, Y.: Studies on vascular permeability in peripheral nerves. 2. Distribution of circulating fluorescent serum albumin in rat sciatic nerve after local injection of 5-hydroxytryptamine, histamine and compound 48/80. Acta physiol. scand.69, Suppl. 284, 3–22 (1966).Google Scholar
  26. —, Reese, T. S.: Permeability of vasa nervorum and perineurium in mouse sciatic nerve studied by fluorescence and electron microscopy. J. Neuropath. exp. Neurol.30, 105–119 (1971).Google Scholar
  27. Schröder, J. M., Krücke, W.: Zur Feinstruktur der experimentell-allergischen Neuritis beim Kaninchen. Acta neuropath. (Berl.)14, 261–283 (1970).Google Scholar
  28. Shantha, T. R., Bourne, G. H.: The perineural epithelium — a new concept, in The structure and function of nervous tissue, Vol. I, pp. 379–459. New York-London: Academic Press 1968.Google Scholar
  29. Shanthaveerappa, T. R., Bourne, G. H.: The perineural epithelium, a metabolically active, continuous, protoplasmic barrier surrounding peripheral nerve fasiculi, J. Anat. (Lond.)96, 527–537 (1962).Google Scholar
  30. ——: The perineural epithelium: nature and significance. Nature (Lond.)199, 577–579 (1963).Google Scholar
  31. ——: The effects of transection of the nerve trunk on the perineural epithelium with special reference to its role in nerve degeneration and regeneration. Anat. Rec.150, 35–50 (1964).Google Scholar
  32. Thomas, P. K.: The connective tissue of peripheral nerve: an electron microscope study. J. Anat. (Lond.)97, 35–44 (1963).Google Scholar
  33. —, Jones, D. G.: The cellular response to nerve injury. 2. Regeneration of the perineurium after nerve section. J. Anat. (Lond.)101, 45–55 (1967).Google Scholar
  34. Waggener, J. D., Bunn, S. M., Beggs, J.: The diffusion of ferritin within the peripheral nerve sheath: an electron microscopy study. J. Neuropath. exp. Neurol.24, 430–443 (1965).Google Scholar
  35. Waksman, B. H., Adams, R. D.: Allergic neuritis: an experimental disease of rabbits induced by the injection of peripheral nervous tissue and adjuvants. J. exp. Med.102, 213–236 (1955).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Allt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyUniversity College LondonLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations