Skip to main content
Log in

Variational formulation of transactional and related interpretations of quantum mechanics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Letters

Abstract

The recently proposed transactional and related differential interpretations of quantum mechanics are given a variational formulation. It seems that recurring controversies surrounding the interpretational question in early quantum mechanics, of whether or not a particle knows its environment, arose from the disharmony between the teleological flavor of the integral formulation of quantum transitions and the causal descriptive order in the differential formulation of wave mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cited in Ref. 2.

  2. E. Schrödinger,Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 2, 269 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. C. Zambrini,Phys. Rev. A33, 1532 (1986);A35, 3631 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. C. Cramer,Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 547 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs,Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Lewins,Importance: The Adjoint Function (Pergamon Press, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Cini,Nuovo Cimento B73, 27 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley,Found. Phys. 14, 255 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Tetrode,Z. Phys. 10, 317 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Schrödinger,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 79, 361 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Popper, inOpen Questions in Quantum Mechanics, G. Tarozzi and A. van der Merwe, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cited in Ref. 16.

  13. J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 425 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. P. Wigner,Z. Phys. 133, 297 (1952);Am. J. Phys. 31, 6 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Nozawa,Transport Theory and Statistical Theory 10, 1 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. A. Miller and J. A. Wheeler, inProceedings of the International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology, S. Kamefuchiet al., eds. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. J. Bohm, C. Dewdney, and B. H. Hiley,Nature 315, 291 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Cufaro-Petroni, C. Dewdney, P. R. Holland, A. Kyprianides, and J. P. Vigier,Found. Phys. 17, 779 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  19. O. Costa de Beauregard,Found. Phys. 17, 775 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ta-You Wu and T. Ohmura,Quantum Theory of Scattering (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Gaveau, T. Jacobson, M. Kac, and L. S. Schulman,Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 419 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hokkyo, N. Variational formulation of transactional and related interpretations of quantum mechanics. Found Phys Lett 1, 293–299 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00690070

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00690070

Key words

Navigation