Melanom und Melanosis conjunctivae

  • Hans Grosse
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Albrich: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.71.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, A. O.: Zit. nachVoss.Google Scholar
  3. Alt, A.: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.58, 659;59, 129.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen, S. R.: Ref. Zbl. Ophthalm.50, H. 4/5.Google Scholar
  5. Anselmi: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.58, 699 (1917);59, 129.Google Scholar
  6. Ascher, R. W.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.72, I, 138 (1924).Google Scholar
  7. Audry: Mbl. Dermat.30, 409 (1900).Google Scholar
  8. Augstein: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.50, 1 (1912).Google Scholar
  9. Bahker: Ref. Zbl. Ophthalm.54, 175 (1951).Google Scholar
  10. Bailey, P.: Die Hirngeschwülste. Stuttgart 1936.Google Scholar
  11. Bauer, K. H.: Das Krebsproblem. Berlin 1949.Google Scholar
  12. Berblinger: Virchows Arch.219 (1915).Google Scholar
  13. Berger, v.: Zit. nachSattler.Google Scholar
  14. Bergmeister, R.: Graefes Arch.82, 543 (1911).Google Scholar
  15. Bettmann: Mißbildungen der Haut. InSchwalbes Handbuch der Mißbildungen, Bd. III, S. 638. Jena 1907.Google Scholar
  16. Bietti, G.: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.100, II, 297 (1938).Google Scholar
  17. Björneboe: Frankf. Z. Path.47, 363 (1934).Google Scholar
  18. Bloch, B.: In Handbuch der Haut- und Geschlechtskrankheiten Bd. I, Das Pigment. Berlin 1927.Google Scholar
  19. Borst, M.: Pathologische Histologie. München 1949.Google Scholar
  20. Bourquin: Z. Augenheilk.57, 129 (1917).Google Scholar
  21. Büchner, F.: Berl. klin. Wschr.1940, 774.Google Scholar
  22. —: Beitr. path. Anat.105, 319 (1941).Google Scholar
  23. Carswell: Zit. nachBirch-Hirschfeld, Realencyclopädie der gesamten Heilkunde, Bd. XV, S. 201. Wien. u. Leipzig 1897.Google Scholar
  24. Casa: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.107 II, 648 (1941).Google Scholar
  25. Cashell: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.116, I, 100 (1950).Google Scholar
  26. Cohier: Zit. nachA. Schweikart, Diss. Berlin 1908.Google Scholar
  27. Cristini, G.: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.107, II, 334 (1941).Google Scholar
  28. Dallos: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.91, II, 678;82, 239 (1934).Google Scholar
  29. Davids, B.: Graefes Arch.149, 449 (1949).Google Scholar
  30. Deelmann, H. T.: Zit. nachGans.Google Scholar
  31. Degering: Diss. Jena 1900.Google Scholar
  32. Demiéville, T.: Virschows Arch.81, 333 (1880).Google Scholar
  33. Doberty, K.: Zbl. Augenheilk.18, 318.Google Scholar
  34. Domilewsky: Ref. Z. Augenheilk.68, 200 (1929).Google Scholar
  35. Dubreuilh: Zit. nachHans.Google Scholar
  36. Duyse, G. van: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.82, 239 (1934).Google Scholar
  37. Dvorak-Theobald: Ref. Graefes Arch.142 (1940).Google Scholar
  38. Eguchi, H.: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.100, I, 492 (1938).Google Scholar
  39. Emanuel, C.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.1938, 538.Google Scholar
  40. Enslin: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.42, II, 109.Google Scholar
  41. Ewing, J.: Zit. nachVoss.Google Scholar
  42. Feyrter, F.: Virchows Arch.301, 417 (1938).Google Scholar
  43. Feyrter, F.: Die vegetative nervöse Peripherie. Wien 1951.Google Scholar
  44. Feyrter u.Unna: Virchows Arch.298, 187 (1938).Google Scholar
  45. Fischer-Wasels, B.: In Handbuch der normalen und pathologischen Physiologie, Bd. 14, S. 1488, 1770.Google Scholar
  46. Fitzpatrik: Arch. of Dermat.63, 443 (1952).Google Scholar
  47. Foster, E.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.42, 525 (1904).Google Scholar
  48. Frédéric, J.: Arch. f. Dermat.69, 323.Google Scholar
  49. Frey, R.: Langenbecks Arch. u. Dtsch. Z. Chir.263, 1 (1949).Google Scholar
  50. Frieboes: Dermat. Z.31 (1920).Google Scholar
  51. Fröhlich, F.: Frankf. Z. Path.60, 517 (1941).Google Scholar
  52. Fuchs, E.: Lehrbuch der Augenheilkunde S. 148. 1908.Google Scholar
  53. Gans, O.: Histologie der Hautkrankheiten. Berlin 1928.Google Scholar
  54. Gasteiger, H.: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.100, 788 (1938).Google Scholar
  55. Grancini, L.: Ref. Z. Krebsforsch.53, 224 (1943).Google Scholar
  56. Greef, R.: Die pathologische Anatomie des Auges. Berlin 1902.Google Scholar
  57. Greifelt, A.: Ärztl. Wschr.1952, 676.Google Scholar
  58. Grütter, W.: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.110, 614 (1938).Google Scholar
  59. Harrison: Anat. Anz.85, (1938).Google Scholar
  60. Hauschild: Z. Anat. u. Morph.11 (1910).Google Scholar
  61. Hayakowa, H.: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.100, 965 (1938).Google Scholar
  62. Held, H.: Zit. nachHueck.Google Scholar
  63. Herxheimer, G.:Lubarsch-Ostertag, Erg. Path.7, S. 362. 1900.Google Scholar
  64. Hochheim, W.: Z. Augenheilk.6, 389 (1901).Google Scholar
  65. Hoeve, J. v. d.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.75, 679 (1925).Google Scholar
  66. Hueck: InKrehl-Marchand, Bd. III, S. 298.Google Scholar
  67. Hueck: Morphologische Pathologie. Leipzig 1938.Google Scholar
  68. —: Beitr. path. Anat.54, 68 (1912);103, 308 (1934).Google Scholar
  69. Jendralski, F.: Virchows Arch.233, 226 (1921).Google Scholar
  70. Kappers, A.: Erg. Anat.33 (1941).Google Scholar
  71. Kaufmann, E.: Lehrbuch der Pathologie. Berlin 1922.Google Scholar
  72. Kayser, B.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.89, II, 77 (1932).Google Scholar
  73. Kestinger: Ref. Zbl. Ophthalm.54, 376 (1951).Google Scholar
  74. Knoche, H.: Nervenarzt23, 227 (1951).Google Scholar
  75. Kölliker: Handbuch der Gewebelehre des Menschen, Bd. 1. 1889.Google Scholar
  76. Kosswig: Zit. nachDavids.—Kraus: Zit. nachBettmann.Google Scholar
  77. Kreibich, C.: Berl. klin. Wschr.1911, 1541.Google Scholar
  78. Kreibig: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.114, 428 (1949).Google Scholar
  79. Kromayer: Zit. nachBettmann-Krompecher.Google Scholar
  80. Zit nachBettmann.Google Scholar
  81. Laennec: Zit. nach A.Schweikart, Diss. Berlin 1908.Google Scholar
  82. Lauber, H.: Z. Augenheilk.9, 132 (1908).Google Scholar
  83. Löhlein, W.: InHenke-Lubarsch, Bd. XI/1, S. 169, 1928.Google Scholar
  84. Löwenstein: Verh. ophthalm. Ges. Heidelberg1927, 439.Google Scholar
  85. Ludwig, A.: Diss. Leipzig 1902.Google Scholar
  86. Marchand: Verh. dtsch. path. Ges.1899 u.1900.Google Scholar
  87. Masson, P.: Schweiz. med. Wschr.1947, 1154.Google Scholar
  88. Zit. nachFeyrter.Google Scholar
  89. Matsunaga: Frankf. Z. Path.47, 363 (1934).Google Scholar
  90. Meesmann, A.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.65, 316 (1920).Google Scholar
  91. Menacho, M.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.43, 359 (1905).Google Scholar
  92. Miescher, G.: Virchows Arch.264, 86 (1927).Google Scholar
  93. Mill: Zit. nachKappers.Google Scholar
  94. Mills, G. M.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.41, 629 (1913).Google Scholar
  95. Nedden, M. zur: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.41, 342 (1903).Google Scholar
  96. Nowokirischy: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.94, I, 521 (1935).Google Scholar
  97. Oberhoff: Graefes Arch.108, 194 (1933).Google Scholar
  98. —: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.92, 569 (1934).Google Scholar
  99. Okinura: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.100, I, 492 (1938).Google Scholar
  100. Oppenheimer: Dtsch. med. Wschr.1903, 43.Google Scholar
  101. Panas, Ph.: Zit. nachSattler.Google Scholar
  102. Papolsky, F.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.98, I, 824 (1937).Google Scholar
  103. Pearsons: The pathology of the eye, Bd. 1, 1904 u. Bd. 2, 1905.Google Scholar
  104. Philps: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.116, I, 100 (1950).Google Scholar
  105. Pillat, A.: Graefes Arch.127, 575 (1931).Google Scholar
  106. Pindikowski: Graefes Arch.92, 296 (1901).Google Scholar
  107. Pischinger: Z. mikrosk.-anat. Forsch.53, 46 (1943).Google Scholar
  108. Poljak: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.67, 198 (1929).Google Scholar
  109. Recklinghausen, v.: Zit, nachKaufmann.Google Scholar
  110. Reese: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.100, II, 297 (1900).Google Scholar
  111. Reis, W.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.38, 559 (1900).Google Scholar
  112. Ribbert: Virchows Arch.208, 360.Google Scholar
  113. —: Beitr. path. Anat.21, 471 (1896).Google Scholar
  114. Riehl: Zit. nachRicke, Arch. f Dermat.,55, 65 (1903).Google Scholar
  115. Rosenstein, A. M.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.75, II, 679 (1925).Google Scholar
  116. Saemisch: Krankheiten der Conjunctiva. InGraefe-Saemisch, Handbuch der Augenheilkunde.Google Scholar
  117. Santoor, N.: Z. Krebsforsch.53, 233 (1943).Google Scholar
  118. Sattler, H.: Die bösartigen Geschwülste des Auges. Leipzig 1924.Google Scholar
  119. Sautter, H., u.H. Hager: Graefes Arch.151, 156 (1950).Google Scholar
  120. Schieck, F.: Beitr. path. Anat.47, 178 (1909).Google Scholar
  121. Schiller, E.: Z. Augenheilk.42, 302 (1919).Google Scholar
  122. Schirmer: Z. Augenheilk.19, 528 (1908).Google Scholar
  123. Schmidt, M. B.: Zit. nachDavids.Google Scholar
  124. Schmidt, Rolf: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.93, II, 164 (1934).Google Scholar
  125. Schmidtmann, M.: Verh. dtsch. path. Ges.1949, 202.Google Scholar
  126. Schreyer, A.: Diss. Erlangen 1908.Google Scholar
  127. Selberg: Berl. klin. Wschr.1940, 406.Google Scholar
  128. Simon: Zit. nachKaufmann.Google Scholar
  129. Soldan: Arch. klin. Chir.59, 261 (1899).Google Scholar
  130. Stock, W.: Ref. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.114, I, 280 (1948).Google Scholar
  131. Stockenius: Virchows Arch.255, 38.Google Scholar
  132. Stoewer: Graefes Arch.54, 436 (1902).Google Scholar
  133. Szekely: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.94, I, 567 (1938).Google Scholar
  134. Szily, A. v.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.56 79 (1916).Google Scholar
  135. Unna: Virchows Arch.143, 224 (1896).Google Scholar
  136. Unna: Berl. klin. Wschr.1893, 14.Google Scholar
  137. —: Anat. Anz.13, Erg.-H. 57 (1897).Google Scholar
  138. Vennemann: Bull. Soc. franç. Ophthalm.16, 129 (1898).Google Scholar
  139. Virchow, H.: Arch. mikrosk. Anat.78 (1911).Google Scholar
  140. Virchow, R.: Die krankhaften Geschwülste.Google Scholar
  141. Voss, Cl.: Arch. f. Dermat.194, 30 (1952).Google Scholar
  142. Wätzold, P.: Graefes Arch.113, 287 (1924).Google Scholar
  143. Waldeyer: Zit. nachAbesser, Virchows Arch.166, 40 (1901).Google Scholar
  144. Westhoff: Zbl. Augenheilk.1898.Google Scholar
  145. Wetzel: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.99, II, 424 (1937).Google Scholar
  146. Wieting u.Hamdi: Beitr. path. Anat.42, 43 (1903).Google Scholar
  147. Wildi: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.75, 126 (1925).Google Scholar
  148. Wintersteiner: Verh. dtsch. ophthalm. Ges. Heidelberg1898, 298.Google Scholar
  149. Wolff, E.: Brit. J. Ophthalm.32, 72 (1948).Google Scholar
  150. Wolfrum, M.: Graefes Arch.71, 195 (1909).Google Scholar
  151. Zeidler, M.: Graefes Arch.122, 629 (1929).Google Scholar
  152. Zimmermann, W.: Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk.65, II, 89 (1934).Google Scholar
  153. Zylmann, E.: Z. Krebsforsch.58, 239 (1952).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1953

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Grosse
    • 1
  1. 1.Pathologischen Institut Dresden-FriedrichstadtDresden-A.

Personalised recommendations