Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of choice for unresectable small liver cancer: percutaneous ethanol injection therapy or transarterial chemoembolization therapy

  • Clinical Aspects in the Treatment for Operable and Session II. Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy II. 2. PEI and Radiotherapy
  • Small Liver Cancer, Percutaneous Ethanol Injection Therapy, Transarterial Chemoembolization Therapy
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become easier with recent advances in imaging diagnosis, but the tumor is frequently unresectable due to underlying advanced liver cirrhosis. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic effect of percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) and transarterial chemoembolization therapy (TACE) for small liver cancers measuring 3 cm or less in diameter and discussed the treatment of choice for unresectable cases. The tumors were divided into two groups on the basis of size: 1.5 cm or less (group A) and 1.6–3 cm in diameter (group B). In group A, the estimated 1- and 3-year survival rates were both 82% for a total of 19 cases. The survival value determined for 10 patients treated with PEIT was slightly higher than that found for 9 patients treated with TACE. In group B, the overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival values for a total of 56 patients were estimated at 83%, 60%, and 35%, respectively. The survial rates for 41 patients treated with TACE were 82%, 53%, and 28% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. PEIT was performed on only 6 patients, whose survival rate was equivalent to that of a surgical resection group. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates for 9 patients who underwent surgical resection were estimated to be 100%, 85%, and 68%, respectively. Based on these results, PEIT seems to be the treatment of first choice for patients with small liver cancers measuring less than 1.5 cm in diameter if the tumor is thought to be unresectable because of associated severe liver cirrhosis. On the other hand, tumors measuring 1.6–3 cm in diameter must first be treated with TACE using a long-acting Lipiodol-carcinostatic suspension, even if resectable. In addition to the tumor size, dynamic CT is also useful for prospective decision of the therapeutic strategy. If the mass is demonstrated to be a hypervascular lesion by dynamic CT, TACE must be selected as the treatment of first choice, even for small lesions measuring 1.5 cm or less in diameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arai K, Matsui O, Takashima T (1989) Effects and limits of hepatic arterial embolization for small hepatocellular carcinoma (3 cm or less). Acta Hepatol Jpn 30: 335

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dusheiko GM, Hobbs KEF, Dick R, Burroughs AK (1992) Treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 340: 285

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ebara M, Ohto M, Sugiura N, Kita K, Yoshikawa M, Okuda K, Kondo F, Kondo Y (1990) Percutaneous ethanol injection for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: study of 95 patients. Gastroenterol Hepatol 5: 616

    Google Scholar 

  4. Horiguchi Y, Itoh M, Takagawa H, Imai H, Kamei A, Sekoguchi B, Nagamura Y (1992) Assessment of chemoembolization therapy for primary liver cancer using a stabilized Adriamycin-Lipiodol suspension. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 31 [Suppl I]: S 60

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kawarada Y, Imai T, Iwata M, Yokoi H, Noguchi T, Mizumoto R (1992) Significance of multidisciplinary therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 31 [Suppl I]: S 13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kumada T, Nakano S, Takeda I, Sugiyama K, Osada T, Kiriyama S, Yamada M, Okabe H (1992) Treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 31 [Suppl I]: S 25

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shiina S, Tagawa K, Unuma T, Takanashi R, Yoshiura K, Komatsu Y, Hata Y, Niwa Y, Shiratori Y, Terano A, Sugimoto T (1991) Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 68: 1524

    Google Scholar 

  8. Takayasu K, Shima Y, Muramatsu Y, Moriyama N, Yamada T, Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Hirohashi S (1987) Hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with intraarterial iodozed oil with and without chemotherapeutic agents. Radiology 163: 345

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yamasaki S, Hasegawa H, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Shimada K (1991) Choice of treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma: hepatectomy, embolization or ethanol injection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6: 408

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horiguchi, Y., Sekoguchi, B., Imai, H. et al. Treatment of choice for unresectable small liver cancer: percutaneous ethanol injection therapy or transarterial chemoembolization therapy. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 33 (Suppl 1), S111–S114 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686680

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686680

Keywords

Navigation