Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective and randomized controlled study of chemoembolization therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Clinical Aspects in the Treatment for Operable and Session II. Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy II. 1. TAE-2
  • Transcatheter Arterial Embolization, Chemoembolization, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Cooperative Study Group conducted a study to assess the therapeutic effects of chemoembolization in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using either epirubicin hydrochloride (FARM) or doxorubicin hydrochloride (ADR). A total of 77 patients were enrolled in this study and randomized into 2 groups: 39 patients were treated with a FARM solution as the material for Lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE; FARM group), and 38 patients were treated with an ADR solution as the material for L-TAE (ADR group). For the FARM group, the 1-year survival rate was 69.9% and the 2-year survival rate was 44.5%. For the ADR group, the corresponding survival rates were 74.7% and 44.0%. The differences among the above figures were not statistically significant. As side effects, fever, nausea, and generalized fatigue occurred at almost the same frequencies in the two groups. Changes detected in the liver function and the peripheral blood cell count in both groups were not severe. There was no significant difference between the toxic effects observed in the two groups. In conclusion, there was no significant difference in therapeutic efficacy between the FARM and ADR groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Epirubicin Study Group for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (1987) Intra-arterial administration of epirubicin in the treatment of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 19: 183

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kawai S, Okamura J, Ogawa M, Ohashi Y, Tani M, Inoue J, Kawarada Y, Kusano M, Kubo Y, Kuroda C, Sakata Y, Shimamura Y, Jinno K, Takahashi A, Takayasu K, Tamura K, Nagasue N, Nakanishi Y, Makino M, Masuzawa M, Mikuriya S, Monden M, Yumoto Y, Mori T, Oda T, the Cooperative Study Group for Liver Cancer Treatment of Japan (1992) Prospective and randomized clinical trial for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma—a comparison of Lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization with and without Adriamycin (first cooperative study). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 31 [Suppl I]: S1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ohishi H, Yoshimura H, Uchida H, Sakaguchi H, Yoshioka T, Ohue S, Matsui T, Takaya A, Tsujii T (1989) Transcatheter arterial embolization using iodized oil (Lipiodol) mixed with an anti-cancer drug for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 23 [Suppl]: S33

    Google Scholar 

  4. Okamura J, Kawai S, Ogawa M, Ohashi Y, Tani M, Inoue J, Kawarada Y, Kusano M, Kubo Y, Kuroda C, Sakata Y, Shimamura Y, Jinno K, Takahashi A, Takayasu K, Tamura K, Nagasue N, Nakanishi Y, Makino M, Masuzawa M, Mikuriya S, Monden M, Yumoto Y, Mori T, Oda T, the Cooperative Study Group for Liver Cancer Treatment of Japan (1992) Prospective and randomized clinical trial for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma—a comparison of L-TAE with Farmorubicin and L-TAE with Adriamycin (second cooperative study). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 31 [Suppl I]: S20

    Google Scholar 

  5. Takayasu K, Shima Y, Muramatsu Y, Moriyama N, Yamada T, Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Hirohashi S (1987) Hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with intraarterial iodized oil with and without chemotherapeutic agents. Radiology 163: 345

    Google Scholar 

  6. Uchida H, Ohishi H, Matsuo N, Nishimine K, Ohue S, Nishimura Y, Maeda M, Yoshioka T (1990) Transcatheter hepatic segmental arterial embolization using Lipiodol mixed with an anticancer drug and Gelfoam particles for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 13: 140

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yodono H, Saito Y, Saikawa Y, Midorikawa H, Yokoyama Y, Takekawa S (1989) Combination chemoembolization therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, mainly using cisplatin (CDDP). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 23 [Suppl]: S42

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, S., Nishioka, M., Ohta, Y. et al. Prospective and randomized controlled study of chemoembolization therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 33 (Suppl 1), S93–S96 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686676

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686676

Keywords

Navigation