Skip to main content
Log in

Dose dependence of the cytokinetic and cytotoxic effects of epirubicin in vitro

  • Original Articles
  • Epirubicin, Cell Culture, Drug Sensitivity
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

CHO cells were exposed in vitro for 1 h to concentrations of 0.1–20 μg/ml of the cytostatic drug epirubicin. Population growth, survival fractions, cell-cycle-phase distribution, and BrdU incorporation were analyzed. A fraction of the cells showed a transitory cytostatic reaction at 1 μg/ml, and >99% of the cells were killed at 10 μg/ml. The survival curve was biphasic with a steep slope at concentrations of up to 5 μg/ml. Approximately 0.1% of the cells were resistant to higher concentrations of epirubicin. Bivariate DNA/BrdU flow cytometry revealed that the sensitive cells were blocked and probably killed in the G2M phase of the cell cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altavilla G, Adamo V, Alafaci E, Buemi B, Caristi B, Condemi G, Toscano G (1989) VP16, epirubicin and procarbazine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Tumori 51: 168

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baranco SC (1975) Review of the survival and cell kinetic effects of Adriamycin (NSC-123 127) on mammalian cells. Cancer Chemother Rep 6: 147

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baranco SC (1986) Cellular and molecular effects of Adriamycin on dividing and nondividing cells. In: Dethlefsen LA (ed) Cell cycle effect of drugs. Pergamon, Oxford, p 251

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley G, Juranka PF, Ling V (1988) Mechanism of multidrug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta 948: 87

    Google Scholar 

  5. Braunschweiger PG, Schiffer LM (1980) Effect of Adriamycin on the cell kinetics of 13 762 rat mammary tumors and implications for therapy. Cancer Treat Rep 64: 3812

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cantoni O, Sestili P, Cattabeni F, Geroni C, Grandi M, Giuliani FC (1989) Cellular and molecular pharmacology of 4′-epidoxorubicin in HeLa cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 115: 373

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cantoni O, Sestili P, Cattabeni F, Geroni C, Giuliani F (1990) Comparative effects of doxorubicin and 4′-epidoxorubicin on nucleic acid metabolism and cytotoxicity in a human tumor cell line. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 27: 47

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gundersen S, Kvinnsland S, Klepp O, Lund E, Hst H (1990) Weekly Adriamycin registered vs 4-epidoxorubicin every second week in advanced breast cancer. A randomized trial. Eur J Cancer 26: 45

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heidemann E, Steinke B, Hartlapp J, Schumacher K, Possinger, Kunz S, Neeser E, Ingersleben G von, Hossfeld D, Waldmann R (1990) Randomized clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with epirubicin and with doxorubicin, each combined with cyclophosphamide in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Onkologie 13: 24

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hemmer J (1990) Rapid in vitro bromodeoxyuridine labeling method for monitoring of therapy response in solid human tumors. Cytometry 11: 603

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaye S, Merry S (1985) Tumour cell resistance to anthracyclines: a review. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 14: 96

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kimler BF, Cheng CC (1982) Comparison of the effects of dihydroxyanthraquinone and Adriamycin on the survival of cultured Chinese hamster cells. Cancer Res 42: 3631

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kretzschmar A, Drings P (1990) Epirubicin weekly in combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and vincristine in untreated small cell lung cancer. Onkologie 13: 141

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lopez M, Natali M, Lauro L di, Tonini G, Carpano S, Vici P, Conti EM (1990) 5-Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and BCNU (FEB) in advanced measurable gastric cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 13: 204

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roth A, Zupanc D, Luetic J, Kaloric K (1990) Open phase II with 5-fluorouracil, 4′epidoxorubicin and mitomycin C (FEM) in advanced gastric cancer. Tumori 75: 51

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tobey RA, Chrissman HA, Oka MS (1976) Arrested and cycling CHO cells as a kinetic model: studies with Adriamycin. Cancer Treat Rep 60: 1829

    Google Scholar 

  17. Toma S, Coialbu T, Biassoni L, Folce U, Gatti C, Canavese G, Giacchero A, Rosso R (1990) Epidoxorubicin plus ifosfamide in advanced and/or soft-tissue sarcoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 26: 453

    Google Scholar 

  18. Torti FM, Bristow MM, Lum BL, Carter SK, Howes AE, Aston DA, Brown BW, Hannigan JF, Meyers FJ, Mitchell EP (1986) Cardiotoxicity of epirubicin and doxorubicin: assessment by endomyocardial biopsy. Cancer Res 46: 3722

    Google Scholar 

  19. Van der Vijgh WJF, Maessen PA, Pinedo HM (1990) Comparative metabolism and pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and 4′-epidoxorubicin in plasma, heart and tumor of tumor-bearing mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 26: 9

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zante J, Schumann J, Barlogie B, Göhde W, Büchner T (1976) New preparation and staining procedure for specific and rapid analysis of DNA distribution. In: Göhde W, Schumann J, Büchner T (eds) Pulse cytophotometry. European Press Medica, Ghent, p 97

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartkowiak, D., Hemmer, J. & Röttinger, E. Dose dependence of the cytokinetic and cytotoxic effects of epirubicin in vitro. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 30, 189–192 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686310

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00686310

Keywords

Navigation