Skip to main content
Log in

Experience of the Belgian Society of Medical Oncology with single-administration 5 g/m2 ifosfamide with mesna as second- or third-line therapy in advanced breast cancer

  • Ifosfamide, Mesna, Advanced Breast Cancer
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In an ongoing phase II trial conducted in advanced breast cancer, we tested a therapy schedule consisting of continuous, 24-h infusion of 5 g/m2 ifosfamide (IFO) in 3 l dextrose saline with mesna (MSN), repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression. Since September 1988, 16 heavily pretreated patients with advanced disease (11 with visceral lesions) considered refractory to standard chemotherapy (regimens always including cyclophosphamide) have been included. Objective partial remissions were observed in two cases (one in liver and one in soft-tissue and pleural lesions), and disease stabilization for at least 3 months occurred in four cases. No treatment-related death was recorded and tolerance was judged to be excellent (six cases) or acceptable in all instances. The haematological toxicity consisted mainly of transient leucopenia (nadirs evaluated by WHO scale as grade 3 in 43% and grade 4 in 29%), sometimes associated with thrombocytopenia (grade 3 in 7% and grade 4 in 7%). Other side effects included nausea and/or vomiting (grade 3-4 in 33%); worsening of preexisting alopecia (five cases); haemorrhagic cystitis (one case); mild, transient somnolence (two cases); and moderate fluid retention (two cases). We concluded that infusion of 5 g/m2 IFO over 24 h with MSN rescue might represent an acceptable second-or third-line salvage regimen. Close monitoring of haematological and renal function parameters is recommended. A larger number of patients will be treated in a continuation of this study to evaluate the true response rate within narrower confidence limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andriole GL, Sandlung J, Miser J, Arasi V, Linehan M, Magrath I (1987) The efficacy of mesna (2-mercaptoethane sodium sulfonate) as a uroprotectant in patients with hemorrhagic cystitis receiving further oxazaphosphorine chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 5: 799

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brade WP, Herdrich K, Varini M (1985) Ifosfamide—pharmacology, safety and therapeutic potential. Cancer Treat Rev 12: 1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bramwell V, Mouridsen HT, Santoro A, Blackledge G, Somers R, Verwey J, Dombernowsky P, Onsrud M, Thomas D, Sylvester R, Van Oosterom AT (EORTC Soft-tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group) (1987) Cyclophosphamide versus ifosfamide: final report of a randomized phase II trial in adult soft-tissue sarcomas. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23: 311

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Heuson JC, Kumaoka S, Segaloff A, Rubens RD (1977) Assessment of response in advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 13: 89

    Google Scholar 

  5. Loehrer PJ (ed) (1989) Current developments and future direction with ifosfamide. Semin Oncol 16 (1) [Suppl 3]

  6. Meanwell C, Blake A, Kelly K, Honigsberger L, Blackledge G (1986) Prediction of ifosfamide/mesna associated encephalopathy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 22: 815

    Google Scholar 

  7. Steger G, Dittrich C, Schlappack O, Mader R, Herold C, Brade W, Keller A, Moser K (1988) Toxicity and response to high-dose ifosfamide/mesna as salvage therapy of advanced breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 114: 602

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paridaens, R., Focan, C., Michel, J. et al. Experience of the Belgian Society of Medical Oncology with single-administration 5 g/m2 ifosfamide with mesna as second- or third-line therapy in advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 26 (Suppl 1), S63–S65 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685423

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685423

Keywords

Navigation