Advertisement

Journal of Low Temperature Physics

, Volume 57, Issue 5–6, pp 501–527 | Cite as

The attenuation and phase velocity of ultrasonic third sound for optically smooth and roughened substrates

  • Edward R. Generazio
  • Robert W. Reed
Article

Abstract

The attenuation and phase velocity of third sound have been measured for propagation on optically smooth and roughened substrates and for ultrasonic frequencies in the 20–200 kHz range. The attenuation for both kinds of substrates is found to be proportional to the frequency and have a magnitude that increases with the amount of roughening. The data are found to be inconsistent with a number of proposed attenuation mechanisms. The phase velocity is nearly independent of the frequency. Pulse wave shapes change substantially as the third sound propagates along a substrate surface.

Keywords

Attenuation Magnetic Material Phase Velocity Substrate Surface Pulse Wave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. R. Atkins and I. Rudnick, inProgress in Low Temperature Physics, Vol. 6, C. J. Gorter, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. J. Bergman,Physical Acoustics, Vol. XI, W. P. Mason and N. Thurston, eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1975), Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. J. Verbeek, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands (1979), unpublished; see also K. Telschow, J. Rudnick, and T. G. Wang,J. Low Temp. Phys. 18, 43 (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. G. Wang, Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (1971), unpublished.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. W. F. Everitt, K. R. Atkins, and A. Denenstein,Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 161 (1962);Phys. Rev. 136, A1494 (1964).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Wang and I. Rudnick,J. Low Temp. Phys. 9, 425 (1972).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. J. Bergman,Phys. Rev. 188, 370 (1969);Phys. Rev. A 3, 2058 (1971).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. J. Putterman,Superfluid Hydrodynamics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. Ambegaokar, B. I. Halperin, D. R. Nelson, and E. D. Siggia,Phys. Rev. B 21, 1806 (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. Ambegaokar, B. I. Halperin, D. R. Nelson, and E. D. Siggia,Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 783 (1978).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. G. Dash,Films on Solid Surfaces (Academic Press, New York, 1975), p. 258.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. R. Generazio, R. W. Reed, and H. M. Frost,Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 174 (1983).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. L. Pollack,Phys. Rev. 143, 103 (1966);149, 149 (1966).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. T. Ippen,Estuary and Coastline Hydrodynamics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966), Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Born and E. Wolf,Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, London, 1975), Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. A. Auld,Acoustic Fields and Waves in Solids (Wiley, 1973), Vol. 1, Chapter 4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. L. Szabo and A. J. Slobodnik, Jr.,IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrasonics 20, 240 (1973).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. L. Buck and J. M. Mochel,Physics 107B, 403 (1981).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. J. Bishop and J. D. Reppy,Phys. Rev. B 22, 5171 (1980).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Erie Scientific Company, Portsmouth, New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. R. Generazio, Ph. D. Thesis, Pennsylvania State University (1983) (Pub. No. 83–27, 492, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. R. Generazio and R. W. Reed,J. Low Temp. Phys. 56, 355 (1984).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Sachse and Y.-H. Pao,J. Appl. Phys. 49, 4320 (1978).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. H. Scholtz, E. O. McLean, and I. Rudnick,Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 147 (1974).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Frenkel,Kinetic Theory of Liquids (Oxford University Press, 1946), p. 332; G. D. Halsey,J. Chem. Phys. 16, 931 (1948); T. L. Hill,J. Chem. Phys. 17, 580 (1949).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    E. S. Sabisky and C. H. Anderson,Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 1049 (1970);Phys. Rev. A 7, 790 (1973).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. P. Henkel, E. N. Smith, and J. D. Reppy,Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 1276 (1970).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Chester, L. C. Yang, and J. B. Stephens,Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 211 (1972).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. J. Stoker, inPure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. IV, R. Courant, L. Bers, and J. J. Stoker, eds. (Interscience, New York, 1957).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. A. Roth, G. J. Jelatis, and J. D. Maynard,Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 333 (1980).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward R. Generazio
    • 1
  • Robert W. Reed
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and Applied Research LaboratoryPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations