Journal of Paleolimnology

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 43–52 | Cite as

Charophyta: their use in paleolimnology

  • Adriana García


Charophyta are common algae in limnic waters from many regions and are an interesting group from an evolutionary point-of-view, as they are believed to be related to the Chlorophyceae and land plants. Paleontological-botanical systematics are discussed, taking into consideration some new advances. Charophytes live in all types of inland waters and are sensitive to ecological change, and so they are very useful paleolimnological markers. Gaps concerning gyrogonite morphology in extant taxa and their responses to different environmental conditions must be described. This paper discusses data concerning ecological factors affecting the distribution of Argentinian Charophyta (principally distributed between 30°S and 40°S), gyrogonite morphology related to different ecological conditions, and the way that Charophyta can modify the environment.

Key words

Charophyta evolution gyrogonite morphology ecology-paleoecology Argentina South America 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borowitzka, M. A., 1982. Morphological and cytological aspects of Algal calcification. Int. Revue Cytol. 74: 127–161.Google Scholar
  2. Burne, R. V., I. Bauld & P. De Deckker, 1980. Saline lake charophytes and their geological significance. J. sedim. petrol. 50: 281–293.Google Scholar
  3. Cáceres, E. J., 1989. Ultrastructure and systematics of Charales (Charophyceae). Premier Colloque International sur les Charophytes actuelles et fossiles. Montpellier: 10.Google Scholar
  4. Cáceres, E. J. & E. Parodi, 1985. Contribución al conocimiento de la citología de carófitos (Characeae) de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. I. Amitosis enNitella clavata. Physis 43: 39–42.Google Scholar
  5. Cann, J. H. & P. De Deckker, 1981. Fossil Quaternary and living Foraminifera from athalassic (non-marine) saline lakes, southern Australia. J. Paleont. 55: 660–670.Google Scholar
  6. Chadefaud, M., 1979. L'évolution de la structure cladomienne chez les Charales et les Céramiales: étude comparative. Rev. Algol. 14: 253–273.Google Scholar
  7. Chivas, A. R., P. De Deckker & J. M. G. Shelley, 1985. Strontium content of ostracods indicates lacustrine palaeosalinity. Nature 316: 251–253.Google Scholar
  8. Chivas, A. R., P. De Deckker & M. Shelley, 1986. Magnesium content of non-marine ostracod shells: a new palaeosalinometer and palaeothermometer. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 54: 131–152.Google Scholar
  9. Cocucci, A. E. & E. J. Cáceres, 1976. The ultrastructure of the male gametogenesis inChara contraria var.nitelloides (Charophyta). Phytomorphology 26: 5–16.Google Scholar
  10. Conkin, J. E. & B. M. Conkin, 1989. Gastropod predation on Devonian Charophyte gyrogonites. Premier Colloque International sur les Charophytes actuelles et fossiles. Montpellier: 15.Google Scholar
  11. Corillion, R., 1957. Les Charophycées de France et d'Europe occidentale. Bull. Soc. Sci. Bret. 32: 1–499.Google Scholar
  12. Dyck, L. A., 1970. Morphological, chemical and developmental studies ofChara oosporangial walls. Ph. D. thesis. University of Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  13. García, A., 1987. Estudio del gametangio femenino de Charophyta actuales de Argentina. Análisis comparado con el registro fósil correspondiente. Tesis Doctora. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Argentina, 312 pp.Google Scholar
  14. García, A., 1993. Hallazgo deChara baltica Bruz. (Charophyta) en Argentina. Candollea 48(1): 297–303.Google Scholar
  15. García, A., 1993. Quaternary and extantLamprothamnium Groves (Charophyta) from Argentina. Hydrobiologia 267: 143–154.Google Scholar
  16. González, M. A., E. A. Musacchio, A. García, R. Pasculal & A. Corte, 1981. Las líneas de costa pleistocénicas de la Salina del Bebedero (San Luis, Argentina). VIII Congreso geólogico argentino. III: 617–628.Google Scholar
  17. Grambast, L., 1974. Phylogeny of the Charophyta. Taxon 23: 463–481.Google Scholar
  18. Grant, M. & V. W. Proctor, 1972.Chara vulgaris andChara contraria: Patterns of reproductive isolation for two cosmopolitan species complexes. Evolution 26: 267–281.Google Scholar
  19. Grant, M. & V. W. Proctor, 1989. Genetic differentiationvs photypic plasticity inChara haitensis. Premier Colloque International sur les Charophytes actuelles et fossiles. Montpellier: 25.Google Scholar
  20. Guerlesquin, M., 1990. Contribution to morphogenesis and sexual reproduction in Charophyta. Phytomorphology 40: 189–216.Google Scholar
  21. Guerlesquin, M. & V. Podlejski, 1980. Characées et végétaux submergés et flottants associés dans quelques milieux Camarguais. Naturalia monspeliensia, ser. Bot. 36: 1–20.Google Scholar
  22. Horn af Rantzien, H., 1956. Morphological terminology relating to female Charophyte and fructifications. Bot. Not. 109: 212–259.Google Scholar
  23. Horn af Rantzien, H., 1959. Recent charophyte fructifications and their relations to fossil charophytes gyrogonites. Ark. Bot., ser. 4: 165–332.Google Scholar
  24. McConnaughey, T. A., 1991. Calcification inChara corallina: CO2 hydroxylation generates protons for bicarbonate assimilation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36: 619–628.Google Scholar
  25. McConnaughey, T. A. & R. H. Falk, 1991. Calcium-proton exchange during algal calcification. Biol. Bull. 180: 185–195.Google Scholar
  26. Moestrup, O., 1970. The fine structure of mature spermatozoids ofChara corallina, with special reference to microtubules and scales. Planta 93: 295–308.Google Scholar
  27. Mojon, P. O., 1989. Polymorphisme écophénotypique et paléoécologie des Porocharacées (Charophytes) du Crétacé basal (Berriasian) du Jura franco-suisse. Revue de Paléobiologie (Museum d'Histoire Naturelle), 8: 505–524.Google Scholar
  28. Pedrola, J. & J. D. Acuña, 1986. Algunos aspectos de la variabilidad de los oogonios en poblaciones actuales del géneroChara (Charophyceae). Aplicación paleontológica. Estudios geol. 41: 341–348.Google Scholar
  29. Pickett-Heaps, J. D., 1974. Cell division inStichococcus. Br. Phycol. J. 9: 63–73.Google Scholar
  30. Pickett-Heaps, J. D., 1975. Green Algae: Structure, reproduction and evolution in selected genera. Sinauer Assoc. edit.Google Scholar
  31. Pickett-Heaps, J. D., 1976. Cell division inRaphidonema longiseta. Ark. Protistenkd. 118: 209–212.Google Scholar
  32. Pickett-Heaps, J. D., 1979. Electro Microscopy and the Phylogeny of green Algae and Land Plants. Amer. Zool. 19: 545–554.Google Scholar
  33. Pickett-Heaps, J. D. & H. J. Marchant, 1972. The phylogeny of the green Algae: a new proposal. Cytobios 6: 255–264.Google Scholar
  34. Proctor, V. W., 1962. Viability ofChara oospores taken from migratory water birds. Ecology 45: 656–658.Google Scholar
  35. Proctor, V. W., 1975. The nature of Charophyta species. Phycologia 14: 97–113.Google Scholar
  36. Proctor, V. W., 1980. Historical biogeography ofChara (Charophyta): an appraisal of the Braun-Wood classification plus a falsifiable alternative for future consideration. J. Phyc. 16: 218–233.Google Scholar
  37. Proctor, V. W., 1989. Chareae and Nitelleae: contrasting reflections on invertebrate herbivory. Premier Colloque International sur les Charophytes actuelles et Montpellier: 45.Google Scholar
  38. Soulié-Märsche, I., 1979. Etude comparée des gyrogonites de Charophytes actuelles et fossiles et phylogénie des genres actuelles. Thèse d'Etat. Montpellier.Google Scholar
  39. Soulié-Märsche, I., 1982. Charophytes. In: Le Shati, lac Pleistocéne au Fezzan (Libye). (Ed. Petit-Maire, N.), C.N.R.S.: 80–85.Google Scholar
  40. Soulié-Märsche, I., 1989. Etude comparée des gyrogonites des Charophytes actuelles et fossiles et phylogénie des genres actuelles (revised edition, Thèse d'Etat, Montpellier, 1979). Imprimerie des Tilleuls, Millau, France, 237 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Soulié-Märsche, I., 1991. Charophytes as lacustrine biomarkers during the Quaternary in North Africa. J. african Earth Sc. 12: 341–351.Google Scholar
  42. Stewart, K. D. & K. R. Mattox, 1975. Comparative cytology, evolution and classification of the green algae with some consideration of the origin of other organisms with clorophyllsa andb. Bot. Rev. 41: 104–135.Google Scholar
  43. Subramanian, D., 1989. Cytopolymorphism environmental conditions inChara zeylanica complex. Premier Colloque International sur les Charophytes actuelles et fossiles. Montpellier: 56.Google Scholar
  44. Wood, R. D., 1962. New combinations and taxa in the revision of Characeae. Taxon 11: 7–25.Google Scholar
  45. Wood, R. D. & K. Imahori, 1965. Monograph of the Characeae. Vol. I. A revision of the Characeae, Eds. J. Cramer, Weinheim, 904 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Zaneveld, J. S., 1940. The Charophyta of Malaysia and adjacent countries. Blumea IV: 1–223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriana García
    • 1
  1. 1.Cátedra de MicropaleontologíaFacultad de Ciencias Naturales y MuseoLa PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations