Foundations of Physics Letters

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 21–35 | Cite as

Measurement: It ain't over till it's over

  • Jeffrey Bub
Article

Abstract

Elby (1993) has raised certain problems that appear to be devastating for modal interpretations of quantum mechanics, but do not arise for Bohm's pilot wave theory. Here I show that the features Elby identifies as objectionable in my version of the modal interpretation have their counterpart in Bohm's theory. To the extent that Bohm's theory works as a “no collapse” solution to the measurement problem - and I think it does - so does my modal interpretation.

Key words

measurement problem modal interpretation pilot wave 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Albert D., and Loewer, B. (1990). “Wanted dead or alive: Two attempts to solve Schrödinger's paradox,” in A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels, eds.,Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Volume 1 (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bohm, D., and Hiley, B. (1993).The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory (Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bub, J. (1992). “Quantum mechanics without the projection postulate,”Found. Phys. 22, 737–754.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bub, J. (1993). “The Measurement Problem,” forthcoming in L. Accardi, ed.,Proceedings of the Symposium, “The Interpretation of Quantum Theory: Where Do We Stand?” (New York, April 1 – 4, 1992). To be published by Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dewdney, C., Holland, P. R., and Kyprianidis, A. (1986).Phys. Lett. 119A, 259–267.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dewdney, C., Holland, P. R., Kyprianidis, A., and Vigier, J. P. (1988).Nature 336, 536–544.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dieks, D. (1989).Phys. Lett. A 142, 439.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elby, A. (1993). “Why ‘modal’ interpretations of quantum mechanics don't solve the measurement problem,”Found. Phys. Lett. , this issue.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gleason, A. M. (1957). “Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert Space”J. Math. Mech. 6, 885–993.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Healey, R. (1989).The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: An Interactive Interpretation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kochen, S. (1985). “A new interpretation of quantum mechanics,” in P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds.,Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics (World Scientific, Singapore), p. 151.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kochen, S., and Specker, E. P. (1967). “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics.”J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Fraassen, B. (1991).Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View (Clarendon Press, Oxford).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Bub
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of Maryland at College ParkCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations