Journal of Low Temperature Physics

, Volume 64, Issue 1–2, pp 73–86 | Cite as

Magnetic susceptibility observation of removing oxygen from some Chevrel compounds

  • W. H. Wright
  • D. M. Ginsberg
Article

Abstract

A refined method for preventing the incorporation of oxygen into Chevrel compounds is presented. This method has been used in producing Cu1.8Mo6S8, SnMo6S8, and PbMo6S8. The removal of oxygen enhances the magnetic susceptibility of these materials as well as raising their superconducting transition temperatures. The curves of magnetic susceptibility versus temperature show structures that may indicate lattice deformations.

Keywords

Oxygen Transition Temperature Magnetic Susceptibility Magnetic Material Refined Method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ø. Fischer,Appl. Phys. 16, 1 (1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Yvon, inCurrent Topics in Materials Science, E. Kaldis, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), Vol. 3, Chapter 2.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Yvon, A. Paoli, R. Flükiger, and R. Chevrel,Acta Cryst. B 33, 3066 (1977).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. C. Johnson, R. N. Shelton, and J. J. Bugaj,Solid State Commun. 21, 949 (1977).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Baillif, K. Yvon, R. Flükiger, and J. Muller,J. Low Temp. Phys. 37, 231 (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Baillif, A. Dunand, J. Muller, and K. Yvon,Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 672 (1981).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Flükiger and R. Baillif, inTopics in Current Physics, Ø. Fischer and M. B. Maple, eds. (Springer, Berlin 1982), Vol. 32, Chapter 4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. D. Jorgensen and D. G. Hinks,Solid State Commun. 53, 289 (1985).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. M. Miller and D. M. Ginsberg,Phys. Rev. B 28, 3765 (1983).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. G. Hinks, J. D. Jorgensen, and H. C. Li,Solid State Commun. 49, 51 (1984).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. E. Reeves, W. M. Miller, and D. M. Ginsberg,J. Low Temp. Phys. 59, 509 (1985).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Hauk,Mat. Res. Bull. 12, 1015 (1977).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. J. Norton,Nature 191, 701 (1961).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Yvon and A. Paoli,Solid State Commun. 24, 41 (1977).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Baillif, A. Junod, B. Lachal, J. Muller, and K. Yvon,Solid State Commun. 40, 603 (1981).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. W. Chu, S. Z. Huang, C. H. Lin, R. L. Meng, M. K. Wu, and P. H. Schmidt,Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 276 (1981).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. W. Kimball, L. Weber, G. Van Landuyt, F. Y. Fradin, B. D. Dunlap, and G. K. Shenoy,Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 412 (1976).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. D. Bader, G. S. Knapp, S. K. Sinha, P. Schweiss, and B. Renker,Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 344 (1976).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. D. Shevchenko, O. V. Alexandrov, S. V. Drozdova, G. A. Kalyuzhnaya, K. V. Kiseleva, V. F. Primachenko, N. V. Shevchuk, and V. E. Yachmenev,Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 8, 342 (1982).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. Guenzburger, D. E. Ellis, P. A. Montano, G. K. Shenoy, S. K. Malik, D. G. Hinks, P. Vaishnava, and C. W. Kimball,Phys. Rev. B 32, 4398 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. H. Wright
    • 1
  • D. M. Ginsberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and Materials Research LaboratoryUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana

Personalised recommendations