Conclusions
-
1.
Heat 2 has a higher resistance to cyclic impact loading and crack propagation than heats 1, 3, and 4.
-
2.
The optimal heat treatment for heat 2 to obtain the best resistance to cyclic impact loading with acting stress σ≥180 kg/mm2 is aging at 490° for 3 h, and aging at 510° for 3 h at lower stresses.
-
3.
Surface hardening (shotpeening) increases the resistance to impact loading more substantially for heat 1 than heat 3.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
M. L. Bernshtein, Thermomechanical Treatment [in Russian], Metallurgizdat, Moscow (1968), p. 705.
G. A. Beresnev, V. P. Vylezhnev, and V. I. Sarrak, "Susceptibility to brittle fracture of maraging steel N18K9M5T (MS200) and high-strength martensitic steel," Metal. i Term. Obrabotka Metal., 6, 25 (1968).
M. D. Perkas and V. M. Kardonskii, High-Strength Maraging Steels [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1970), pp. 140–188.
Ya. M. Potak, High-Strength Steels [in Russian], Advances in Modern Metal Science Series, Metallurgiya, Moscow (1972), pp. 116–139.
Yu. A. Volkov, "Fatigue life of steel at low temperatures," Metal. i Term. Obrabotka Metal., 1, 62 (1971).
E. Steigerwald and G. Hanna, ASTM,62, 657 (1962).
P. Forrest, Fatigue of Metals [Russian translation], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1968), p. 85.
Additional information
Translated from Metallovedenie i Termicheskaya Obrabotka Metallov, No. 7, pp. 37–41, July, 1975.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maloletnev, A.Y., L'vov, Y.B., Pestov, I.V. et al. Resistance of maraging steel N18K9M5T to cyclic impact loads. Met Sci Heat Treat 17, 584–588 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00680406
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00680406