Advertisement

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

, Volume 19, Issue 12, pp 905–923 | Cite as

Characterization of quantum logics

  • P. J. Lahti
Article

Abstract

The quantum logic approach to axiomatic quantum mechanics is used to analyze the conceptual foundations of the traditional quantum theory. The universal quantum of actionh > 0 is incorporated into the theory by introducing the uncertainty principle, the complementarity principle, and the superposition principle into the framework. A characterization of those quantum logics (L, S) which may provide quantum descriptions is then given.

Keywords

Field Theory Elementary Particle Quantum Field Theory Quantum Mechanic Quantum Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beltrametti, E. G., and Cassinelli, G. (1976). “Logical and Mathematical Structures of Quantum Mechanics,”Rivista del Nuovo Cimento,6, 321–404.Google Scholar
  2. Beltrametti, E. G., and Cassinelli, G. (1977). “On State Transformations Induced by Yes-No Experiments, in the Context of Quantum Logic,”Journal of Philosophical Logic,6, 369–379.Google Scholar
  3. Beltrametti, E. G., and Cassinelli, G. (1979). “Properties of States in Quantum Logic,”Problems in the Foundations of Physics, 29–70 (Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi,” Course 72), North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  4. Bohr, N. (1928). “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory,”Nature,121, 580–590.Google Scholar
  5. Bohr, N. (1935). “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?”Physical Review,48, 696–702.Google Scholar
  6. Bub, J. (1979). “Conditional Probabilities in Non-Boolean Possibility Structure,”The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, Vol. II, pp. 209–226.Google Scholar
  7. Bugajska, K., and Bugajski, S. (1973). “Description of Physical Systems,”Reports on Mathematical Physics,4, 1–20.Google Scholar
  8. Bugajski, S. (1979). “The Inner Language of Operational Quantum Mechanics,” inProceedings of the Workshop on Quantum Logic, “Ettore Majorana” Center for Scientific Culture, Erice-Trapani, Sicily.Google Scholar
  9. Bugajski, S., and Lahti, P. (1980). “Fundamental Principles of Quantum Theory,”International Journal of Theoretical Physics,19, 499–514.Google Scholar
  10. Cassinelli, G., and Beltrametti, E. G. (1975). “Quantum Logic and Ideal Measurements of First Kind,”Fundamenta Scientiae, Vol. 28, University Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  11. Cassinelli, G., and Beltrametti, E. G. (1975). “Ideal, First-Kind Measurements in a Proposition-State Structure,”Communications in Mathematical Physics,40, 7–13.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, E. (1976).Quantum Theory of Open Systems, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, E., and Lewis, J. (1970). “An Operational Approach to Quantum Probability,”Communications in Mathematical Physics,17, 239–260.Google Scholar
  14. Dirac, P. (1958).The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford, Clarendon Press (First edition, 1930).Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, C. (1970). “The Operational Approach to Algebraic Quantum Theory I,”Communications in Mathematical Physics,16, 207–230.Google Scholar
  16. Finkelstein, D. (1963).The Logic of Quantum Physics, Transactions of the N.Y. Academy of Science, Vol. 25, pp. 621–637.Google Scholar
  17. Finkelstein, D. (1969).Matter, Space, and Logic. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 5, pp. 199–215.Google Scholar
  18. Gerjuoy, E. (1973). “Is the Principle of Superposition Really Necessary?” inContemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, C. A. Hooker, ed., D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 114–142.Google Scholar
  19. Gleason, A. (1957). “Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hubert Space,”Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics,6, 885–893.Google Scholar
  20. Greechie, R. (1969). “An Orthomodular Poset with a Full Set of States Not Embeddable in Hubert Space,”Carribean Journal of Science and Mathematics,1, 15–26.Google Scholar
  21. Greechie, R., and Gudder, S. (1973). “Quantum Logics,” inContemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, C. A. Hooker, ed., D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 143–173.Google Scholar
  22. Gudder, S. (1970). “Axiomatic Quantum Mechanics and Generalized Probability Theory,” inProbabilistic Methods in Applied Mathematics, Bharucha-Reid, ed., Academic Press, New York, pp. 53–129.Google Scholar
  23. Gudder, S. (1977). “Four Approaches to Axiomatic Quantum Mechanics,” inThe Uncertainty Principle and Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, W. C. Price and S. S. Chissick, eds., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., London, pp. 247–276.Google Scholar
  24. Haag, R., and Bannier, U. (1978). “Comments on Mielnik's Generalized (Non Linear) Quantum Mechanics,”Communications in Mathematical Physics,60, 1–6.Google Scholar
  25. Heisenberg, W. (1927). “Uber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,”Zeitschrift für Physik,43, 172–198.Google Scholar
  26. Jammer, M. (1974).The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Janowitz, M. (1963). “Quantifiers on Quasi-orthomodular Lattices,” Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University.Google Scholar
  28. Jauch, J. (1968).Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  29. Lahti, P. (1979a). “Uncertainty and Complementarity in Axiomatic Quantum Mechanics,” Dr. dissertation, University of Turku (to appear inInternational Journal of Theoretical Physics).Google Scholar
  30. Lahti, P. (1979b). “On the interrelations of the three quantal principles,” inProceedings of the Workshop on Quantum Logic, “Ettore Majorana” Center for Scientific Culture, Erice-Trapani, Sicily.Google Scholar
  31. Lahti, P. (1980). “Uncertainty Principle and Complementarity in Axiomatic Quantum Mechanics,”Reports on Mathematical Physics,17, 99–110.Google Scholar
  32. Mackey, O. (1963).Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, W. A. Benjamin, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Maczynski, M. (1967). “A Remark on Mackey's Axiom System for Quantum Mechanics,”Bulletin del Academie Polonaise des Sciences, Serie des Sciences Mathematiques Astronomiques et Physiques,15, 583–587.Google Scholar
  34. Maczynski, M. (1973). “The Orthogonality Postulate in Axiomatic Quantum Mechanics,”International journal of Theoretical Physics,8, 353–360.Google Scholar
  35. Mielnik, B. (1968). “Quantum Logic and Evolution,”Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré,9, 1–5.Google Scholar
  36. Mielnik, B. (1969). “Theory of Filters,”Communications in Mathematical Physics,15, 1–46.Google Scholar
  37. Mielnik, B. (1974). “Generalized Quantum Mechanics,”Communications in Mathematical Physics,37, 221–256.Google Scholar
  38. Piron, C. (1964). “Quantum Axiomatics,”Helvetica Physica Acta,37, 439–468.Google Scholar
  39. Pool, J. (1968). “Baer*-Semigroups and the Logic of Quantum Mechanics,”Communications in Mathematical Physics,9, 118–141.Google Scholar
  40. Pool, J. (1968). “Semimodularity and the Logic of Quantum Mechanics,”Communications in Mathematical Physics,9, 212–228.Google Scholar
  41. Scheibe, E. (1973).The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, C. (1973).Physics Reference Books, Vol. 3, Richard Clay Ltd., Bungay, Suffolk.Google Scholar
  43. Varadarajan, V. (1968).Geometry of Quantum Theory I, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.Google Scholar
  44. von Neumann, J. (1955).Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (First edition 1932).Google Scholar
  45. Wick, G., Wightman, A., and Wigner, E. (1952). “The Intrinsic Parity of Elementary Particles,”Physical Review,88, 101–105.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. Lahti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical SciencesUniversity of TurkuTurku 50Finland

Personalised recommendations