Abstract
This is an expository review of the Lorentz transformation, which is a change of coordinates used by one “inertial observer” to those used by another one. The transformation can be represented by a four-by-four matrix, the Lorentz matrix or the Minkowski-Lorentz matrix. The most familiar, or “special,” case has thex axis of both observers parallel to their relative velocity. A more general transformation drops this constraint. But then a seeming “paradox” arises when there are three observers, and this has led to a challenge to the self-consistency of the special theory of relativity. It is shown here that this challenge is based on a misunderstanding. The properties of the more general Lorentz transformation are reviewed consistently in terms of the matrix approach, which the author believes is now the easiest approach to understand. The spectral analysis of the Lorentz matrix is also discussed. Several checks are included to “make assurance double sure.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arzelies, H. (1966).Relativistic Kinematics, Pergamon Press, New York.
Askwith, E. H. (1921).A Course in Pure Geometry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Blackett, P. M. S. (1946). Personal communication in Donner House, Manchester, England.
Dirac, P. A. M. (1958).The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Eddington, A. S. (1930).The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Einstein, A. (1923). On the electrodynamics of moving bodies [English translation ofAnnalen der Physik,17, 891 (1905)], in H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Weyl, and H. Minkowski,The Principle of Relativity, Methuen, London [reprinted Dover, New York (1952)].
Fisher, R. A., and Yates, F. (1953).Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research, 4th ed., Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
Galeczki, G. (1993).Physics Essays,6, 448–450.
Galeczki, G. (1994a).Chinese Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,5, 77–78.
Galeczki, G. (1994b).Physics Essays,7, 83–86.
Good, I. J. (1991).Physics Essays,4, 591–595.
Good, I. J. (1994). The self-consistency of the kinematics of special relativity,Physics Essays,7(4), in press.
Jen, C. K. (1991). Zeeman and Stark effects, inEncyclopedia of Physics, Rita G. Lerner and George L. Trigg, eds., pp. 1370–1374.
Kline, M. (1972).Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lamb, H. (1929).Higher Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mathematical Society of Japan (1977).Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics, I, Shôkichi Iyanaga and Yukiyosi Kawada, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Møller, C. (1972).The Theory of Relativity, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Pais, A. (1982).Subtle Is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Pauli, W. (1958).Theory of Relativity, Pergamon Press, London.
Phipps, T. E., Jr. (1974).Lettere al Nuovo Cimento,9, 467–470.
Phipps, T. E., Jr. (1986).Heretical Verities, Classic Non-Fiction Library, Urbana, Illinois.
Thomas, L. H. (1927). The kinematics of an electron with an axis,Philosophical Magazine 7th Series,3, 1–22.
Tonnelat, M.-A. (1966).The Principles of Electromagnetic Theory and of Relativity, Gordon and Breach, New York.
Uhlenbeck, G. E. (1976). Fifty years of spin. Personal reminiscences,Physics Today,1976(June), 43–48.
Whittaker, E. T. (1953).History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity: The Modern Theories, 1900–1926, Nelson, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Good, I.J. Lorentz matrices: A review. Int J Theor Phys 34, 779–799 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00671022
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00671022